Early Marx and modern "Fintech"

Beryozkin Yu.M.1
1 Байкальский государственный университет, Russia

Journal paper

Creative Economy (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 13, Number 2 (February 2019)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37099950
Cited: 8 by 28.06.2023

Abstract:
On the eve of Karl Marx bicentennial his ideas affect social de-velopment tendencies again. This paper substantiates a hypothesis that financial technology revolution taking place since 2008 in its core has philosophic ideas formulated by Marx in 1844-1848. The Marx’s method of ascent from the ab-stract to the concrete is used. The goal of this research is to reveal logical links between abstract theoretical ideas of Marx and their concrete realization in fi-nancial technology practice started after World Financial Crisis 2007-2008. Also we show that the financial technology revolution has as its intermediate basis the neo-institutional theory of transaction costs by Ronald Coase. Marx’s ideas about relations of property were made more concrete by Coase in a way of reducing transaction costs through non-market forms of economic activity (inside a firm). We show that the methods of mutual project investment of tangible assets by different owners facilitate a value added growth via transaction costs reduction. The mutual project investment and ownership operations for transactions costs reduction are widely used in China but also becomes more popular in the Western financial practice. Block chain technology serves as the technological base for the next step of financial and investment activity methods development. On this base there are widely spread digital platforms which allow to transfer to the third level of technologies – valuable. They also allow to cancel transaction (in a sense of Coase) or private property alienation (in a sense Marx). This re-search opens a wide field for further economic investigation of transaction chains that are going to be eliminated during the entrepreneurial projects realization.

Keywords: property, blockchain, Fintech, Transactions Costs, Impact Investing, Digital Platforms, Financial Technology Revolution

JEL-classification: O31, O33, O32, A10

References:

Alchiyan A. (2004). Pravo sobstvennosti [The right of ownership] M.: Infra-M. (in Russian).
Arrigi Dzh. (2009). Adam Smit v Pekine. Chto poluchil v nasledstvo XXI vek [Adam Smith in Beijing. What XXI century has got as a legacy] M.: Izdatelstvo Institut obschestvennogo proektirovaniya. (in Russian).
Auzan A. (2013). Ekonomika vsego. Kak instituty opredelyayut nashu zhizn [The economy of everything. How institutions define our lives] M.: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber. (in Russian).
Babkin A.V., Chistyakova O.V. (2017). Tsifrovaya ekonomika i eyo vliyanie na konkurentosposobnost predprinimatelskikh struktur [Digital economy and its impact on the competitiveness of business structures]. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 18 (24). 4087-4102. (in Russian).
Bagg-Levin E., Emerson Dzh. (2017). Sotsialno-preobrazuyuschie investitsii. Kak my menyaem mir i zarabatyvaem dengi [Socio-transformative investments. As we change the world and make money] M.: Izdatelstvo Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya. (in Russian).
Beryozkin Yu.M. (2006). Problemy i sposoby organizatsii finansov [Problems and ways of organizing the finance] Irkutsk: Izd-vo BGUEP. (in Russian).
Chernyshev S.B. (1993). Smysl. Periodicheskaya sistema ego elementov [Sense. Periodic system of elements] M.: Izdatelstvo MARTIS. (in Russian).
Chernyshev S.B. (2018). Tekhnoekonomika. Komu i zachem nuzhen blokcheyn [Technoeconomics. Who and why needs the blockchain] M.: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya. (in Russian).
Commons John R. (1931). Institutional Economics American Economic Review. (21). 648-657.
Demsetz Harold (1968). Cost of Transacting Quarterly Journal of Economics. (81). 33-53.
Efimov V.M. (2016). Ekonomicheskaya nauka pod voprosom: inye metodologiya, istoriya i issledovatelskie praktiki [Economic science in question: additional methodology, history and research practice] M.: Infra-M. (in Russian).
Eggertsson T. (2001). Ekonomicheskoe povedenie i instituty [Economic behavior and institutions] M.: Delo. (in Russian).
Gamilton U.Kh. (2007). Institutsionalnyy podkhod k ekonomicheskoy teorii [The institutional approach to economic theory]. The Economic vestnik. 5 (2). 110-117. (in Russian).
Kouz R. (2007). Priroda firmy [The nature of the firm] M.: Novoe izdatelstvo. (in Russian).
Kouz R., Nin V. (2016). Kak Kitay stal kapitalisticheskim [How China became capitalist] M.: Novoe izdatelstvo. (in Russian).
Kremlyov T.S. (2017). Tsifrovaya ekonomika i sfera ekspertizy investitsionnyh proektov – chto zhe novogo? [The digital economy and the sphere of expertise of investment projects – what's new?] Topical issues of economics, management and finance in modern Russia. 17-25. (in Russian).
Marks K., Engels F. (1955). Manifest kommunisticheskoy partii [The Communist Manifesto] M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury. (in Russian).
Marks K., Engels F. (1955). Nemetskaya ideologiya [The German ideology] M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury. (in Russian).
Marks K., Engels F. (1955). Svyatoe semeystvo [Holy family] M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury. (in Russian).
Marks K., Engels F. (1974). Ekonomiko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 g [Economic-philosophical manuscripts of 1844] M.: Izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury. (in Russian).
Nort D. (2010). Instituty, institutsionalnye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, institutional change and economic performance] M.: Izd. Dom Gos. Un-ta – Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. (in Russian).
Onoshko O.Yu., Peshkova O.V., Peshkova E.A. (2018). Problemy i perspektivy internet-bankinga v usloviyakh tsifrovoy ekonomiki [Problems and prospects of internet banking in the digital economy]. Nauchnyy zhurnal Diskurs. (7(21)). 245-254. (in Russian).
Platonov S. (1989). Posle kommunizma [After communism] M.: Izd-vo «Molodaya gvardiya». (in Russian).
Popov E.V. (2011). Transaktsii [Transaction] Yekaterinburg: UrO RAN. (in Russian).
Popov E.V. (2018). Ekonotronika [Econotronics]. Economy of the region. 14 (1). 13-28. (in Russian).
Popov S.V. (1999). Organizatsiya khozyaystva v Rossii [Organization of economy in Russia] Omsk: «Kurer». (in Russian).
Schedrovitskiy G.P. (2006). Osobennosti niskhozhdeniya i voskhozhdeniya pri issledovanii «organicheskikh» obektov [Features of ascent and descent in the study of “organic” objects] M.: Fond «Institut razvitiya im. G. P. Schedrovitskogo». (in Russian).
Soto E., de. (2004). Zagadka kapitala. Pochemu kapitalizm torzhestvuet na Zapade i terpit porazhenie vo vsem ostalnom mire [The mystery of capital. Why capitalism triumphs in the West and defeated the rest of the world] M.: Izdatelstvo Olimp-Biznes. (in Russian).
Stanfield J.R. (1999). The Scope, Method, and Significance of Original Institutional Economics Journal of Economic Issues. (2). 231-255.
Sukhodolov A.P., Kolpakova L.A., Spasennikov B.A. (2017). Problemy protivodeystviya prestupnosti v sfere tsifrovoy ekonomiki [Issues of Counteracting Crimes in the Sphere of Digital Economy]. Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 11 (2). 258-267. (in Russian).
Williamson O.E. (1979). Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations Journal of Law and Economics. 22 233-261.
Zhigas M.G., Kuzmina S.N. (2017). Sovremennye tendentsii ispolzovaniya tsifrovyh tekhnologiy v bankovskoy sfere [Modern trends in the use of digital technologies in the banking sector] Eurasian cooperation. 76-87. (in Russian).

Страница обновлена: 26.05.2025 в 14:32:31