Innovative aspects of a favorable institutional configuration design of the regional business environment
Malikov R.I.1, Grishin K.E.1, Mukhametova D.D.1
1 Уфимский государственный нефтяной технический университет
Download PDF | Downloads: 13
Journal paper
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship *
Volume 18, Number 7 (April 2017)
* Этот журнал не выпускается в Первом экономическом издательстве
Abstract:
The article considers the issues of formation of a favorable institutional configuration of the business environment as a factor of the increase in entrepreneurial activity and successful socioeconomic development of the region. We conclude that the indicator of administrative pressure on business entities is one of the key indicators of the institutional configuration effectiveness of the business environment. We substantiate the innovative approach to the structuring of the institutional configuration of the business environment based on the parameters of administrative pressure on business entities. We define the business structures costs for implementation of joint administrative requirements, norms and rules. We offer methodological assessment tools for the business capacity of the business environment, allowing calculating the parameters of allocative efficiency in design of a format of a favorable institutional configuration of the regional business environment aimed at the development of rational management decisions that promote the support of favorable conditions for entrepreneurship development.
Keywords: entrepreneurship, аavorable institutional configuration of the business environment, administrative pressure on business, power structures
References:
Degtyarev A., Malikov R., Grishin K. (2014). Institutsionalnaya konfiguratsiya regionalnoy delovoy sredy: parametry proektirovaniya [The institutional configuration of the regional business environment: design parameters]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. (11). 83-94. (in Russian).
Degtyarev A., Malikov R., Grishin K. (2014). Sopryazhennost interesov biznesa i vlasti kak uslovie razvitiya predprinimatelskogo soobschestva [Joint business and authority efforts as means of promotion to business community development]. Obschestvo i ekonomika. (2-3). 156-173. (in Russian).
Frolov D. (2016). Metodologicheskiy institutsionalizm 2.0: ot institutov k institutsionalnym konfiguratsiyam [Methodological institutionalism 2.0: From institutions to institutional configurations]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. (7). 147-160. (in Russian).
Grishin K., Arapov V. (2013). Instrumentariy vyyavleniya «tochek rosta» predprinimatelstva v regione [Tools for identifying "growth points" of entrepreneurship in the region]. Ekonomika regiona. (4). 150-156. (in Russian).
Kirdina S. (2013). Metodologicheskiy individualizm i metodologicheskiy institutsionalizm [Methodological Individualism and Methodological Institutionalism]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. (10). 66-89. (in Russian).
Kuzminov Ya., Radaev V., Yakovlev A., Yasin E. (2005). Instituty: ot zaimstvovaniya k vyraschivaniyu [Institutions: from borrowing to cultivation]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. (5). 5-27. (in Russian).
Malikov R., Grishin K. (2014). Modelirovanie parametrov razvitiya institutsionalnoy konfiguratsii regionalnoy delovoy sredy [Modeling the development features of institutional configuration of the regional business environment]. Ekonomicheskaya politika. (6). 171-186. (in Russian).
Matose F. (2008). Institutional configurations around forest reserves in Zimbabwe: The challenge of nested institutions for resource management Local Environment The International Journal of justice and Sustainability. 13 (5). 393-404.
Mau V. (2010). Ekonomicheskaya politika 2009 goda: mezhdu krizisom i modernizatsiey [Economic Policy of 2009: Between Crisis and Modernization]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. (2). 4-25. (in Russian).
Nort D. (1997). Instituty, institutsionalnye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, institutional changes and functioning of an economy] M.: Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi «Nachala». (in Russian).
Polischuk L. (2008). Netselevoe ispolzovanie institutov: prichiny i sledstviya [Misuse of Institutions: Its Causes and Consequences.]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. (8). 28-44. (in Russian).
Polischuk L. (2013). Autsorsing institutov [Outsourcing of institutions]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. (9). 40-65. (in Russian).
Polterovich V. (2006). Strategii institutsionalnyh reform Perspektivnye traektorii [Strategies of the institutional reforms. Promising paths]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. 42 (1). 3-18. (in Russian).
Popov E. (2015). Instituty [Institutes] Yekaterinburg: Institut ekonomiki UrORAN. (in Russian).
Salimaht M., Cullen J. B. (2012). Institutional configurations in innovation and entrepreneurship: A multi country study (Interactive Paper) Frontiers. 32 (16).
Solodilova N., Malikov R., Grishin K. (2016). Vliyanie administrativnogo regulirovaniya na effektivnost predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti v regione [Development of the Tools for the Assessment of the Influence of Administrative Regulation on the Business Efficiency in the Region]. Ekonomika regiona. 12 (4). 1001-1013. (in Russian).
Stephan U.,Uhlaner L.M., Stride C. (2015). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations Journal of International Business Studies. (3). 308-331.
Weingast B.R. (1995). The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market Preserving Federalism and Economic Development Law, Economic and Organization. (11(1)). 3-31.
Williamson O.E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead Journal of Economic Literature. 38 (3). 595-613.
Страница обновлена: 10.05.2025 в 03:56:53