The problems of national sovereignty in the context of global economic development trends

Ashmarina S.I., Kandrashina E.A., Izmaylov A.M. (2017). Global megatrends, trends and their impact on the Russian education system. Trends and management. (2). 55—64.

Balatskiy, E.V. (2007). Theory of life resources: models and empirical estimates. Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya. (2). 124—133.

Bizengin B., Eneeva M. (2017). Change is brewing in the world hegemonic countries. Society and economics. (8). 109—126.

Bogdanova E.V. (2011). The modern theory of the Ministry of Defense about China's views on sovereignty. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Ser. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. (3). 81—85.

Cook J., Oreskes N., Doran P.T. (2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human- caused global warming Environmental Research Letters. (4). 048002.

Cruz E., Raurich X. (2020). Leisure time and the sectoral composition of employment Review of Economic Dynamics. 38 198—219.

Eatock D. The silver economy: Opportunities from ageingEuropean Parliament, 2015. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/EPRS-Briefing-565872-The-silver-economy-FINAL.pdf

Ekimova N.A. (2021). Global megatrends and new technologies: challenges for and threats to the post-industrial economy. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 14 (5). 116–134.

Konyshev V.N. (2010). American Neorealism on the issue of sovereignty. Politeks. 6 (4). 68—88.

Krushanov A.A., Mamchur E.A. (2011). The future of fundamental science: Conceptual, philosophical and social aspects of the problem

Kun T.S. (2009). The structure of scientific revolutions

Kuzyk B.N., Yakovets Yu. V. (2006). Civilizations: theory, history, dialogue, future. In 2 volumes. Volume 2. The future of civilizations and geocivilizational dimensions

Lakatos I. (1995). Falsification and methodology of scientific research programs

Lebedeva M.M. (2012). Modern trends in global development: a new quality of the world

Lebedeva M.M. (2017). The perfect storm as a result of the hybridization of world politics

Mariotti S. «Open strategic autonomy» as an industrial policy compass for the EU competitiveness and growth: The good, the bad, or the ugly?. J. Ind. Bus. Econ. (2024). Retrieved March 21, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-024-00327-y

Nazaretyan A.P. (2015). The nonlinear future: the singularity of the 21st century as an element of mega-history. Vek globalizatsii. (2). 18—34.

Neysbitt Dzh. (2003). Megatrends

Osvetimskaya I.I. (2017). State sovereignty: content and transformation in the era of globalization. Pravovedenie (The Legal Studies today). (2). 150-167.

Pantin V.I., Lapkin V.V. (1998). Waves of political modernization in Russia's history (to the discussion of a hypothesis). \\\\\\\\. (2). 39-51.

Petrov M.N. (2022). About the current paradigm of project management. Upravlenie programmami i proektami. (2). 122-131.

Petrov M.N. (2022). Methodology of management of innovative programs and projects in high-tech engineering in the context of digital transformation

Petrov M.N. (2022). Theoretical foundations of the development of innovation and project management during the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Petrov M.N. (2023). Technological sovereignty: basic principles of the concept of national scientific and technological security. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. (3).

Petrov M.N., Filippov Ya.S. (2023). Technological sovereignty: the Evolution of Russian and International Economic Models. Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. 13 (5A). 328—338.

Potapov A. S. (2017). Technological singularity in the context of the theory of metasystem transitions. Kompyuternye instrumenty v obrazovanii. (6). 12-24.

Shakleina T.A., Boykov A.A. (2013). Megatrends: The main trajectories of the evolution of the world order in the 21st century

Shestopal S.S., Astakhov V.V., Avilkina A.A. (2019). Evolution of state sovereignty consept in the context of the global and regional integration processes. part 1 the epoch of modern. Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal. 8 (3). 225—230.

Shestopal S.S., Turchinskaya E.S. (2019). Classical and post-classical interpretations of state sovereignty: modern vs postmodern political and legal discourse. Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal. 8 (3). 231—235.

Shvab Kl. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution

Shvyryov V.S. (1995). Rationality in the range of its possibilities. Historical types of rationality

Smil V. (2012). Global disasters and trends

Steffen W., Richardson K., Rockstrom J. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet Science. 347 (6223). 736—753.

Timofeev O.A. (2012). Evolution of the concept of the state sovereignty in China. Kontury globalnyh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, pravo. (2). 114-120.

Volkov L.V. (2022). Key global trends influencing the transformation of the modern economy. Finansovye rynki i banki. (4). 228—235.