Особенности устойчивого строительства и экодевелопмента на основе зарубежного опыта зеленых стандартов
Баронин С.А.1
, Артюшин А.И.1, Ильин А.Ю.2
1 Пензенский государственный университет архитектуры и строительства
2 Российский экономический университет им. Г.В. Плеханова
Скачать PDF | Загрузок: 18
Статья в журнале
Жилищные стратегии (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Том 11, Номер 2 (Апрель-июнь 2024)
Эта статья проиндексирована РИНЦ, см. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=65641108
Аннотация:
Актуальность настоящей темы определяется ее ориентированностью на исследование проблематики формирования устойчивого строительства и эколого-ориентированного девелопмента на основе проведения системного анализа зарубежного опыта в области зеленых стандартов строительства для его адаптации на национальном жилищном рынке России.
Цель исследования состоит в изучении особенностей устойчивого строительства и эколого-ориентированного девелопмента на зарубежных эко-рынках в условиях применения зеленых стандартов с выработкой рекомендаций по его применения на национальном инвестиционно-строительном рынке.
Основными научными результатами исследования с элементами научной новизны являются: этапы исторического генезиса развития устойчивого строительства и основные принципы зеленого строительства и экодевелопмента; структурная специфика основных зарубежных стандартов в области зеленого строительства и экодевелопмента на примере США, Великобритании и Германии (LEED, BREEAM, DGNB); классификация сложностей в применении принципов зеленого строительства с анализом особенностей стимулирования и продвижения зеленого строительства; особенности экономических обоснований для высокопроизводительных экологически чистых зданий.
Настоящее исследование ориентировано на научно-практических работников строительных организаций, застройщиков, специалистов в области государственного и муниципального управления, студентов, аспирантов и докторантов, работающих по формированию и применению успешных стратегий развитию национального рынка зеленого строительства.
Ключевые слова: устойчивое развитие, зеленое строительство, жилищный рынок, государственное регулирование, экодевелопмент
JEL-классификация: G28, L74, R58, R52
Источники:
2. Баронин С.А., Гущина Е.С. Развитие стратегий жилищного строительства на основе концепции устойчивости и эколого-ориентированного девелопмента // Жилищные стратегии. – 2023. – № 3. – c. 237-256. – doi: 10.18334/zhs.10.3.118996.
3. Артамонова Ю.С., Баронин С.А., Бенуж А.А., Буданов И.В., Волгин В.В., Волков Р.В., Гущина Е.С., Кулаков К.Ю., Манухина Л.А., Попова И.В., Смирнова Ю.О., Стяжкова Н.М., Учинина Т.В. Устойчивое развитие территорий на основе эколого-ориентированных жизненных циклов строительства. / Монография. - Пенза: Пензенский государственный университет архитектуры и строительства, 2022. – 588 c.
4. Ahmad T., Aibinu A. A., Stephan A. Managing green building development–a review of current state of research and future directions // Building and Environment. – 2019. – p. 83-104. – doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.034.
5. Ahn Y.H. et al. Drivers and barriers of sustainable design and construction: The perception of green building experience // International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development. – 2013. – № 1. – p. 35-45. – doi: 10.1080/2093761X.2012.759887.
6. Chan E.H.W., Qian Q.K., Lam P.T.I. The market for green building in developed Asian cities—the perspectives of building designers // Energy Policy. – 2009. – № 8. – p. 3061-3070. – doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.057.
7. Chen L., Chan A.P.C., Owusu E.K., Darko A., Gao X. Critical success factors for green building promotion: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Building and Environment. – 2022. – p. 108452. – doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108452.
8. Understanding and interpreting baseline perceptions of sustainability in construction among civil engineers in the United States // Journal of Management in engineering. – 2009. – № 3. – p. 143-154. – doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2009)25:3(143).
9. Çiner F., Doğan-Sağlamtimur N. Environmental and sustainable aspects of green building: A review // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. – 2009. – № 1. – p. 012001. – doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/706/1/012001.
10. Cole R.J., Jose Valdebenito M. The importation of building environmental certification systems: international usages of BREEAM and LEED // Building Research and Information. – 2013. – № 6. – p. 662-676. – doi: 10.1080/09613218.2013.802115.
11. Darko A., Chan A.P.C. Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals // Habitat International. – 2016. – p. 53-63.
12. Darko A. et al. Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption: The United States green building experts’ perspectives // Energy and Buildings. – 2017. – p. 320-332. – doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.060.
13. Dean B. et al. Towards zero-emission efficient and resilient buildings: Global Status Report. , 2016. – 32 p.
14. Durdyev S. et al. What drives clients to purchase green building?: The cybernetic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach // Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. – 2022. – № 10. – p. 4015-4039. – doi: 10.1108/ECAM-11-2020-0945.
15. Dwaikat L.N., Ali K.N. The economic benefits of a green building–Evidence from Malaysia // Journal of Building Engineering. – 2018. – p. 448-453.
16. Illankoon I.C.S., V.W.Y. Tam, Khoa N.Le, Shen L. Key credit criteria among international green building rating tools // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2017. – p. 209-220. – doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.206.
17. Kibert C.J. Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. - Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, 2016. – 407 p.
18. Korkmaz S. Piloting evaluation metrics for high performance green building project delivery. - Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University, 2007.
19. Li Y.Y. et al. Exploration of critical resources and capabilities of design firms for delivering green building projects: Empirical studies in Singapore // Habitat International. – 2014. – p. 229-235. – doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.08.008.
20. Love P.E.D. et al. Achieving the green building council of Australia’s world leadership rating in an office building in Perth // Journal of construction engineering and management. – 2012. – № 5. – p. 652-660. – doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000461.
21. Mulligan T.D. et al. Public policy and impacts on adoption of sustainable built environments: Learning from the constuction industry playmakers // Journal of Green Building. – 2014. – № 2. – p. 182-202. – doi: 10.3992/1943-4618-9.2.182.
22. Nelson A.J., Rakau O., Dörrenberg P. Green buildings: a niche becomes mainstream //Deutsche Bank Research. – 2010. – С. 3-22
23. Nguyen H.D., Macchion L. Risk management in green building: a review of the current state of research and future directions // Environment, Development and Sustainability. – 2023. – № 3. – p. 2136-2172. – doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02168-y.
24. O’Neill K., Gibbs D. Green building and sustainability: Diffusing green building approaches in the UK and Germany. / In book: The Palgrave Handbook of Sustainability. - Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. – 547-565 p.
25. Parker J. BSRIA report. The Value of BREEAM..
26. Patel P., Patel A. Use of sustainable green materials in construction of green buildings for sustainable development // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. – 2021. – № 1. – p. 012009.
27. Potbhare V., Syal M., Korkmaz S. Adoption of green building guidelines in developing countries based on US and India experiences // Journal of Green Building. – 2009. – № 2. – p. 158-174. – doi: 10.3992/jgb.4.2.158.
28. Rodriguez-Nikl T. et al. Structural engineers and sustainability: An opinion survey // Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. – 2015. – p. 04014011. – doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000228.
29. Shibani A. et al. The Impact of Green Certification Breeam On Occupancy Rates Of Commercial Buildings In The UK // International Journal of Innovations in Engineering Research and Technology. – 2021. – № 9. – p. 153-167.
30. Vyas S., Ahmed S., Parashar A. BEE (Bureau of energy efficiency) and Green Buildings // International Journal of Research. – 2014. – № 3. – p. 23-32.
31. Zhang L., Wu J., Liu H. Turning green into gold: A review on the economics of green buildings // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2018. – p. 2234-2245. – doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.188.
32. Zhang X., Shen L., Wu Y. Green strategy for gaining competitive advantage in housing development: a China study // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2011. – № 2-3. – p. 157-167.
33. Greening the Economy—A Strategy for Growth, Jobs and Success. - London: Aldersgate Group, 2011.
34. BREEAM UK New Construction 2018. - Watford: BRE Global, 2018.
35. Economics B.C.I. Green Building Market Report Australia. - New Zealand, 2014.
36. USGBC Files.eric.ed.gov. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED477687.pdf.
Страница обновлена: 11.09.2025 в 14:19:03
Download PDF | Downloads: 18
Characteristics of sustainable construction and eco-development based on foreign experience of green standards
Baronin S.A., Artyushin A.I., Ilyin A.Yu.Journal paper
Russian Journal of Housing Research (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Volume 11, Number 2 (April-June 2024)
Abstract:
The article focuses on the study of the problems of sustainable construction and environmentally oriented development based on a systematic analysis of foreign experience in green building standards for their adaptation to the national housing market in Russia.
The research purpose was to study the characteristics of sustainable construction and eco-oriented development in foreign eco-markets in the context of green standards with the development of recommendations for its application in the national investment and construction market.
The main scientific results of the research with elements of scientific novelty are as follows: the stages of the historical genesis of the sustainable construction development and the basic principles of green construction and eco-development; the structural specifics of the main foreign standards in green construction and eco-development on the example of the USA, Great Britain and Germany (LEED, BREEAM, DGNB); classification of difficulties in applying the principles of green construction with an analysis of the features stimulating and promoting green construction; and features of economic justifications for high-performance environmentally friendly buildings.
This research is aimed at scientific and practical workers of construction organizations, developers, specialists in public and municipal management, students, postgraduates and PhD students working on the formation and application of successful strategies for the development of the national green construction market.
Keywords: sustainable development, green construction, housing market, government regulation, eco-development
JEL-classification: G28, L74, R58, R52