Concordance in organization strategic management
Tikhonova A.D.1
, Mokronosov A.G.1
1 Уральский государственный экономический университет
Download PDF | Downloads: 15 | Citations: 2
Journal paper
Creative Economy (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Volume 12, Number 9 (September 2018)
Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36315080
Cited: 2 by 06.02.2021
Abstract:
The article deals with the theoretical and methodological aspects of the problem of ensuring the concordability of organizations as one of the most important characteristics of modern strategic management, reflecting the degree of harmonization of goals, priorities and forms of cooperation of the organization with the subjects of the environment. The relevance of this problem is due to the contradictory nature of the market environment, which contains the dilemma of the "competition-cooperation". The authors propose to consider the behavior of organizations from the point of view of the approach based on the system paradigm, suggesting that the market, as a socio-economic space, is a single system, which includes many elements, the composition and evaluation of the nature of the relationship depends on the objectives of the study. In the context of increasing the importance of the cooperative component of competitive relations, the importance of taking into account the concordability of the organization as one of the factors to ensure its sustainable development. Given the author's interpretation of the economic content of the term "concordant", defines the principles and types concordatoria behavior as well as place of concordance in the model management strategy of the organization. The parameters of mutually beneficial cooperation of subjects in the market are given on the basis of the principles of concordable behavior. According to the authors' hypothesis, concordability, reflecting the focus on the cooperation of the organization, can be an effective tool of strategic management.
Keywords: strategic management, competition, options for mutually beneficial cooperation, organization sustainable development, concordance
JEL-classification: D40, M20, D21
References:
Ansoff I. (2011). Strategicheskoe upravlenie [Strategic management] M.: Ekonomika. (in Russian).
Arbenina T.I., Baksheeva A.D. (2014). Parametry i printsipy konkordosposobnosti subektov rynka obrazovatelnyh uslug [Properties and principles of "concordness" of educational service market subjects]. Discussion. (4(45)). 67-71. (in Russian).
Blank I.A. (2012). Upravlenie pribylyu [Profit management] K.: Nika-Tsentr. (in Russian).
Brandenburger A.M., Nalebuff B.M. (1996). Co-opetition N.Y.: Doubleday.
Chemberlin E. (1996). Teoriya monopolisticheskoy konkurentsii [Monopolistic competition theory] M.: Ekonomika. (in Russian).
Dorozhkina O.K., Shinkevich I.A. (2014). Konkordosposobnost kak faktor konkurentosposobnosti organizatsii [Concordance as a factor of organization competitiveness]. Economics and management: analysis of trends and development prospects. (13). 40-43. (in Russian).
Druker P. (2002). Effektivnoe upravlenie [Effective governance] M.: Grand. (in Russian).
Dzhevons U.S. (2005). Dengi i mekhanizm obmena [Money and the mechanism of exchange] M.: Sotsium. (in Russian).
Edgeworth F.Y., Newman P. (2003). Mathematical psychics, and further papers on political economy Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fatkhutdinov R.A. (2008). Upravlenie konkurentosposobnostyu organizatsii [Organization competitiveness management] M.: MarketDS. (in Russian).
Gelbreyt D.K. (2004). Novoe industrialnoe obschestvo [New industrial society] M.: AST. (in Russian).
Hamel G. (2012). What Matters Now: How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition, and Unstoppable Innovation Bass: Wiley.
Khayek F. (1989). Konkurentsiya kak protsedura otkrytiya [Competition as an opening procedure]. World Economy and International Relations. (12). 6-14. (in Russian).
Kheyne P. (1997). Ekonomicheskiy obraz myshleniya [The economic way of thinking] M.: «Novosti». (in Russian).
Kirtsner I.M. (2010). Konkurentsiya i predprinimatelstvo [Competition and entrepreneurship] M.: Sotsium. (in Russian).
Levitt T. (1983). The Globalization of Markets Harvard : Business Rev.
Makkonel K.R., Bryu S.L. (2002). Ekonomiks: printsipy, problemy i politika [Economics: principles, problems and policies] M.: INFRA-M. (in Russian).
Marks K. (2016). Kapital [Capital] M.: Mann, Ivanov i Farber. (in Russian).
Marshall A. (1993). Printsipy ekonomicheskoy nauki [Principles of economic science] M.: Progress. (in Russian).
Moore J.F. (1997). The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems New York: Harper Business.
Morgan R., Hunt S. (1994). The Commitment-Tryst Theory of Relationship Marketing Journal of Marketing. 58 (3). 20-38.
Nayt F. (2003). Risk, neopredelennost, pribyl [Risk, uncertainty, profit] M.: Delo. (in Russian).
Neyman Dzh. fon, Morgenshtern O. (1970). Teoriya igr i ekonomicheskoe povedenie [Game theory and economic behavior] M.: Nauka. (in Russian).
Novoseltseva Yu.A., Korshunova E.D. (2015). Metod otsenki konkordosposobnosti promyshlennogo predpriyatiya [The method of estimation of industrial enterprise concordance]. Management of economic systems: scientific electronic journal. (8(80)). 15. (in Russian).
Pashkus Yu.V., Misko O.M. (1991). Vvedenie v biznes [Introduction to business] L.: Severo-Zapad. (in Russian).
Porter M. (1993). Mezhdunarodnaya konkurentsiya [International competition] M.: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya. (in Russian).
Porter M. (2016). Konkurentnoe preimuschestvo. Kak dostich vysokogo rezultata i obespechit ego ustoychivost [Competitive advantage. How to achieve a high result and ensure its sustainability] M.: Alpina Pablisher. (in Russian).
Robinson Dzh. (1986). Ekonomicheskaya teoriya nesovershennoy konkurentsii [Economic theory of imperfect competition] M.: Progress. (in Russian).
Shumpeter Y.A. (2007). Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya [Theory of economic development. Capitalism, socialism and democracy] M.: Eksmo. (in Russian).
Smit A. (2016). Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations] M.: Eksmo. (in Russian).
Stalder F. (1998). The Network Paradigm: Social Formations in the Age of Information The Information Society. 14 (4).
Stigler Dzh.Dzh. (1995). Sovershennaya konkurentsiya: istoricheskiy rakurs. Teoriya oligopolii [Perfect competition: a historical perspective. Oligopoly theory] SPb.: Ekonomicheskaya shkola. (in Russian).
Uerta de Soto Kh. (2011). Sotsialno-ekonomicheskaya teoriya dinamicheskoy effektivnosti [Socio-economic theory of dynamic efficiency] Chelyabinsk: Sotsium. (in Russian).
Zhigun L.A. Tretiak N.A. (2008). Metodologicheskie osnovy dinamicheskikh sostoyaniy konkurentsii [Methodology of assessing the dynamic status of competition]. Modern competition. (4(10)). 18-29. (in Russian).
Каплински Р. Распространение положительного влияния глобализации. Какие выводы можно сделать на основании анализа цепочки накопления стоимости?Hse.ru. (in Russian). Retrieved from http://www.hse.ru/science/preprint/default.html
Клейнер Г.Б. Микроэкономические факторы и ограничения экономического ростаМосква: Научная цифровая библиотека PORTALUS.RU. (in Russian). Retrieved July 10, 2018, from http://portalus.ru/modules/ruseconomics/rus_readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1130416134&archive=1254312998&start_from=&ucat=&
Товышева И.З. Основные подходы к исследованию конкуренции и факторов конкурентоспособностиUecs.ru. (in Russian). Retrieved from http://www.uecs.ru/uecs-31-312011/item/510-2011-07-13-10-28-45
Страница обновлена: 13.04.2025 в 00:33:23