Precarization and flexibilization of employment (on the example of the kemerovo area)

Dobrycheva I.V.1
1 Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет - Юргинский технологический институт (филиал)

 Download PDF | Downloads: 22 | Citations: 6

Journal paper

Russian Journal of Labour Economics (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 6, Number 2 (April-June 2019)

Citation:

Dobrycheva, I. V. (2019). Precarization and flexibilization of employment (on the example of the kemerovo area). Russian Journal of Labour Economics, 6(2), 873-882. https://doi.org/10.18334/et.6.2.40502

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39161547
Cited: 6 by 07.12.2023

Abstract:
The article discusses the following trends in the labor market: precarization and flexibilization of employment. It is necessary to organize work to reduce precarisation, given the new economic conditions. It has been revealed that precarization leads to the absence of guarantees of employment, employment, labor protection, etc., and flexibilization implies the achievement of the maximum effect for the employee and the employer. Low social responsibility of employers affects the growth of the amount of prekariat. The data of the indicator «part-time work» are considered on the example of the Kemerovo region. The analysis of statistical data proved that the «on agreement with the employer» mode of work is the only proposed option. At the same time, the number of workers who did not work due to the employer's fault varies in waves and depending on the sub-sector. It is proposed to combine the flexibility of employment and its security, based on the differentiation of jobs.

Keywords: employment, precariat, the precarious work, flexibilisation, flexicurity

JEL-classification: O17, J46, J22, J63, E26

Highlights:

  • 1. Флексибилизация занятости тесно связана с прекаризацией, особенно в моногородах
  • 2.Основной признак прекаризации – нестабильность трудовых отношений
  • 3. Гипотеза: низкая социальная ответственность работодателей влияет на рост объема прекариата.
  • 4. Вывод исследования: работники вынуждены работать неполное рабочее время, так как вариант «находиться в простое» работодатель может и не предложить.
  • 5. Выявлена зависимость между вариантами работы на неполный рабочий день и отраслями промышленности. Например, работники угледобывающей отрасли (добыча угля) предпочитают «находиться в простое».
  • 6. Рабочее место рабочего должно быть защищено, а принципы политики флексикьюрити должны определяться в зависимости от социально-экономического положения региона с учетом его отраслевой специфики.

Похожие статьи:

   Institutionalization of strategic management of production facilities as a factor of effective performance of enterprises in the region (on the example of the Republic of Crimea) (Нестеренко Е.С., Примышев И.Н.) Leadership and Management. Num. 4 / 2019

   Gig economy: risks of employment precarization (Янченко Е.В.) Russian Journal of Labour Economics. Num. 5 / 2022

References:

Bartlin E.A. (2018). Ob ekonomicheskom mekhanizme realizatsii gosudarstvennoy politiki zanyatosti v Rossii [About the economic mechanism of realization of state employment policy in Russia]. Living standards of the population of Russian regions. (2(208)). 78-85. (in Russian).
Gimpelson V.E. (2004). Vremennaya zanyatost v Rossii: dannye, uroven, dinamika, rasprostranennost [Temporary Employment in Russia: Data, Incidence, Dynamics and Diffusion]. Economic Journal. (2). 225–245. (in Russian).
Kherrman P. (2018). Prekarizatsiya – eto ne bezrabotitsa, glupysh [Precarious work is not unemployment, silly]. Living standards of the population of Russian regions. (3(209)). 73-78. (in Russian).
Rozevatov G.A. (2014). Fleksibilizatsiya rynka truda kak osnova poyavleniya nestandartnoy zanyatosti [Flexibilization of Labor Market as a Basis of the Emergence of Nonstandard Employment]. Bulletin of the volga region Institute of Administration. (2(41)). 75-80. (in Russian).
Shipelik O.V. (2015). Prekariat: prichiny poyavleniya, osobennosti suschestvovaniya [The precariat: the reasons of occurrence, features of existence]. Mir nauki i innovatsiy. 7 (2(2)). 52-54. (in Russian).
Toschenko Zh.T. (2015). Novoe yavlenie v sotsialnoy strukture obschestva – prekariat [Precariat: a new phenomenon in society's structure]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 1 (3(3)). 6-23. (in Russian).
Vankevich E.V., Zaytseva O.V. (2016). Kontseptsiya fleksikyuriti i ee implementatsiya v praktiku regulirovaniya zanyatosti v Respublike Belarus [Flexicurity concept and its implementation into practice regulation of employment in the republic of belarus]. Vestnik polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. seriya d: ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. (14). 14-19. (in Russian).
Единая межведомственная информационно-статистическая система ЕМИСС. (in Russian). Retrieved from https://fedstat.ru/organizations
Обследование рабочей силыGks.ru. Retrieved from http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1140097038766

Смотрите также:

   The impact of social advertising on the workforce (Шадрин В.Г.) Creative Economy. Num. 1 / 2025

   Electronic productivity monitoring: opportunities and threats in the changing labour world (Чернышов И.Н.) Russian Journal of Labour Economics. Num. 1 / 2022

   Crowdsourcing as a new form of labour activity in the digital economy: background, essence and content (Чернышов И.Н.) Russian Journal of Labour Economics. Num. 4 / 2021

  Employment in the informal sector: quantitative analysis methods (Маслюкова Е.В., Зайцева Ю.Ю.) Russian Journal of Labour Economics. Num. 4 / 2017

   Sustainable employment: approaches to definition and assessment (Краковская И.Н.) Russian Journal of Labour Economics. Num. 10 / 2021

Страница обновлена: 01.05.2025 в 23:22:50