Guidelines for the development of the modern university
Lunev V.V.1, Luneva T.A.2, Rakhinskiy D.V.3
1 Сибирский федеральный университет, Russia
2 Сибирский государственный аэрокосмический университет им. акад. М.Ф. Решетнева, Russia
3 Красноярский государственный аграрный университет, Russia
Download PDF | Downloads: 18 | Citations: 14
Journal paper
Creative Economy (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Volume 13, Number 2 (February 2019)
Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37099941
Cited: 14 by 28.06.2023
Abstract:
The article is devoted to new approaches to university management. Post-industrial society, the information revolution and globalization will change the face of higher education. Increasingly, the role of information and information technologies in the transmission and learning. The process of transition goes in terms of the digital economy. There is a huge number of programs aimed at implementing quality improvement education. In these conditions, it begins to form a new university model – the university of the third age. A new type of university involves a new system of governance based on the participation of teachers and students, knowledge management, quality education, advanced learning technologies, development of innovative environment and a high level of staff loyalty. Also, the article discusses the proposals related to the requirements for the successful functioning of the modern Russian universities.
Keywords: higher education, university management, the university of the third age, the development of university management system
JEL-classification: I23, I28, I26
References:
Babintsev V.P., Rimskiy V.P. (2014). Byurokratizatsiya vuza kak antiintellektualnyy protsess [The bureaucratization of the university as an anti-intellectual PROCESS]. Nauka Iskusstvo Kultura. (4). 5-17. (in Russian).
Barnett R. (2008). Osmyslenie universiteta [Understanding thw university]. Alma mater ( Higher School Herald). (6). 46-56. (in Russian).
Belenkiy V.Kh. (2008). Konvergentsiya: illyuziya ili perspektiva? [Convergence: the illusion or prospect?]. Sociological Studies (Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia). (8). 123-132. (in Russian).
Elyakov A. (2001). Sovremennoe informatsionnoe obschestvo [Modern information society]. Higher education in Russia. (4). 77-85. (in Russian).
Guzeeva E.M. (2011). Tendentsii izmeneniya menedzhmenta pri upravlenii kreativnostyu personala [Trends of Management Changing under Personnel Creativity Management]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. (9(9)). 20-28. (in Russian).
Khau Dzh. (2012). Kraudsorsing: Kollektivnyy razum kak instrument razvitiya biznesa [Crowdsourcing: Collective intelligence as business development tool] Moscow: Alpina Pablisher. (in Russian).
Kudashov V.I.,Chernykh S.I., Yatsenko M.P., Grigoreva L.I., Pfanenshtil I.A., Rakhinsky D.V. (2017). Historical reflection in the educational process: an axiological approach Analele universitatii din craiova - seria istorie. 22 (1). 139-147.
Kuramshina K.S. (2012). Razvitie innovatsionnoy sredy universiteta [Development of innovative environment of the university]. Bulletin of Kazan National Research Technological University. (10). 356-358. (in Russian).
Laslo B. (2015). Rabota rulit! Pochemu bolshinstvo lyudey v mire khotyat rabotat v kompanii Google [Work rules! Why most people in the world want to work at Google] Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Farber. (in Russian).
Novikov A.M. (2008). Postindustrialnoe obrazovanie [Post-industrial education] M.: Egves. (in Russian).
Osipova S.I. (2016). Kompetentnostnyy podkhod v realizatsii inzhenernogo obrazovaniya [Competence-based approach in realization of engineering education]. Pedagogika. (6). 53-59. (in Russian).
Rakhinskiy D.V. (2015). Globalnoe obrazovanie: otechestvennye aspekty problemy [Global education: the domestic aspects of the problem]. Armed Forces & Society (AFS). (3(46)). 122-126. (in Russian).
Salmon R. (2004). Buduschee menedzhmenta [The future of management] Saint Petersburg: Piter. (in Russian).
Soloveychik A.V. (2010). Loyalnost personala i faktory, kharakterizuyuschie organizatsiyu [Loyalty of employees and the factors characterizing an organization]. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A.I. Gertsena. (125). 93-98. (in Russian).
Toffler E. (2004). Tretia volna [The third wave] Moscow: AST. (in Russian).
Vasilev V., Sukhorukova M. (2004). Informatsionnoe obschestvo i obrazovanie [Information society and education]. Higher education in Russia. (7). 122-129. (in Russian).
Vissima Y. (2016). Universitet tretego pokoleniya: upravlenie universitetom v perekhodnyy period [Third generation university: managing the university in transition] Moscow: Sberbank. (in Russian).
Vorotnikova Yu.S., Gavrilov K.A., Drobysheva E.E., Malimonov I.V. i dr. (2010). Gumanitarnye problemy sovremennosti: chelovek i obschestvo [Humanitarian problems of modern man and society] Novosibirsk. (in Russian).
Yudina A.S., Pavlova I.A. (2014). Mezhdunarodnye reytingi i konkurentosposobnost universitetov [International rankings and competitiveness of universities]. Vestnik nauki Sibiri. (1(24)). 1-24. (in Russian).
Zherebyatnikova G.V. (2012). Obrazovatelnoe prostranstvo vuza: sovremennoe osmyslenie ponyatiya [Educational space of the university: modern understanding of the concept] Pedagogical and psychological science: past, present, future. 64-73. (in Russian).
Симулин А. Секрет «умной» компании. Управление интеллектуальным капиталомEdu.znate.ru. (in Russian). Retrieved from http://edu.znate.ru/docs/index-28091921-1.html?page=25
Титова С.В. Технологические, социальные и дидактические характеристики технологий Интернета второго поколенияIstina.msu.ru. (in Russian). Retrieved from https://istina.msu.ru/publications/article/10681478
Страница обновлена: 21.03.2025 в 04:09:10