Problems and prospects of the motivation for creative labor activity of Russian workers

Popov A.V.¹
¹ Вологодский научный центр Российской академии наук

Download PDF | Downloads: 34 | Citations: 8

Journal paper

Russian Journal of Labour Economics ^{(РИНЦ, ВАК)}
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 6, Number 1 (January-March 2019)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37307841
Cited: 8 by 07.12.2023

Abstract:
The transformation of the world economic system and the transition of the most developed countries to the knowledge economy cause new requirements for the qualitative characteristics of workers. In particular, since the middle of the 20th century, the role of qualification and education in the production process as well as creative potential has increased markedly. These trends actualize the topic of studying the factors facilitating the development of workers’ creative abilities. At the current time, national science has a shortage of such research, which are mainly of a general theoretical nature. In this regard, the article focuses on the motivation for creative labor activity of Russian workers. The study is based on the monitoring data of the qualitative state of labor potential of the Vologda Oblast population for 2018. The results show the heterogeneity of the conditions to unleash workers’ creativity. This is due to the degree of involvement in the creative labor activity and the nature of employment. In conclusion, the author proposes the motivational-stimulating mechanism of creative labor activity.

Keywords: motivation, creativity, labor activity, creative potential, creative abilities

JEL-classification: J24, J23, J20

Highlights:

1. … реализация креативного потенциала работников напрямую зависит от их внутренней мотивации и условий труда.
2. Полученные сведения свидетельствуют о доминировании внешних побудителей к творческой трудовой активности над внутренними.
3. На основании проведенного анализа можно сделать вывод о неоднородности условий для использования творческого потенциала работников.
4. … восприятие трудовой деятельности как самозначимой ценности выступает необходимым условием проявления творческой трудовой активности.

References:

Amabile T.M. (1997). Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do California Management Review. (40). 39-58.
Amabile T.M., Conti R., Coon H., Lazenby J., Herron M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity Academy of Management Journal. (39). 1154-1184.
An Historical Perspective on Labor Productivity in the Modern EraIr.library. Retrieved from https://ir.library.louisville.edu/cgi
Brady D., Fullerton A.S, Cross J.M. (2010). More Than Just Nickels and Dimes: A Cross-National Analysis of Working Poverty in Affluent Democracies Social Problems. (57). 559-585.
Burdzhalov F.E., Gontmakher E.Sh. (2011). Rynok truda: reaktsiya na krizis (po materialam zarubezhnyh stran) [Labor market: reaction to the crisis (based on the materials of foreign countries)] M.: IMEMO RAN. (in Russian).
Chekmareva E.A. (2018). Dinamika i sovremennye osobennosti urovnya realizatsii kachestva trudovogo potentsiala [Performance and Modern Features of Labor Potential Quality Development]. Social space. (3(15)). 2. (in Russian). doi: 10.15838/sa.2018.3.15.2 .
Craft A. (2000). Creativity Across the Primary Curriculum: Framing and Developing Practice: Principles and Practice London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Cummings L. (1965). Organizational Climates for Creativity Academy of Management Journal. (8). 220-227.
Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. (1987). The Support of Autonomy and the Control of Behavior Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. (53). 1024-1037.
Drucker P. (1999). Knowledge Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge California Management Review. (41). 79-94.
Dubina I.N. (2013). Teoretiko-igrovye modeli organizatsii kreativno-innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti firm [Game-theoretic models of the organization of firms creative and innovative activity] Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta. (in Russian).
Dul J., Ceylan C. (2011). Work Environments for Employee Creativity Ergonomics. (54). 12-20.
Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Attitudes DataGemconsortium. Retrieved from https://www.gemconsortium.org/data
Glazev S.Yu., Ivanter V.V., Makarov V.L. i dr. (2011). O strategii razvitiya ekonomiki Rossii [Development Strategy of the Russian Economy]. Economics of Contemporary Russia. (3(54)). 7-31. (in Russian).
Gupta B. (2009). Understanding the Preferences of Creative & Non-creative Employees Industrial Relations. (45). 289-301.
Ivanter V.V., Komkov N.I. (2016). Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya innovatsionnoy sfery Rossii v ramkakh Programmy Prezidiuma RAN «Analiz i prognoz dolgosrochnyh tendentsiy nauchnogo i tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya: Rossiya i mir» [STATUS AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT RUSSIAN INNOVATION SPHERE THE PROGRAM OF THE PRESIDIUM OF RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES "Analysis and Forecast of long-term scientific trends and technological development: Russia and the World"]. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 7 (1). 76-82. (in Russian). doi: 10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.1.76.82 .
Jaskyte K., Kisieliene A. (2006). Determinants of Employee Creativity: A Survey of Lithuanian Nonprofit Organizations Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. (17). 133-141.
Khromov N.I. (2015). Genezis kontseptsii chelovecheskogo kapitala [The Genesis of the Human Capital Concept]. The Manager. (3(55)). 46-51. (in Russian).
Kozyreva P.M., Smirnov A.I. (2016). Predposylki i problemy uchastiya v innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti [The Preconditionsand Problems of Partaking in Innovational Activities]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii. (2(17)). 66-90. (in Russian). doi: 10.19181/vis.2016.17.2.398.
Lebdi N.A., Hussinger K. (2016). Startup Innovation during the Past Economic Crisis Luxembourg: University of Luxembourg.
Leonidova G.V., Ustinova K.A., Gordievskaya A.N. (2018). Motivy i usloviya tvorcheskoy trudovoy aktivnosti naseleniya [Motives and Conditions for Population’s Creative Labor Activity]. Territorial development issues. (3(43)). 2. (in Russian). doi: 10.15838/tdi.2018.3.43.2 .
Lvov D.S. (1999). Put v XXI vek [The path to the XXI century] M.: Ekonomika. (in Russian).
Oldham G.R., Cummings A. (1996). Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work Academy of Management Journal. (39). 607-634.
Potudanskaya V.F., Bogdanchikova T.V. (2008). Razvitie trudovoy i tvorcheskoy aktivnosti rabotnikov v usloviyakh predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti [Development of labor and creative activity of employees in the conditions of entrepreneurial activity] Omsk: Izd-vo OmGTU. (in Russian).
Rhodes M. (1961). An Analysis of Creativity Phi Delta Kappan. (42). 305-310.
Schepers P., Van den Berg T. (2007). Social Factors of Work-Environment Creativity Journal of Business and Psychology. (21). 407-428.
Shabunova A.A., Leonidova G.V., Ustinova K.A. (2018). Teoreticheskie podkhody k issledovaniyu motivatsii tvorcheskoy trudovoy aktivnosti naseleniya v sotsiogumanitarnoy mysli [Theoretical Approaches to Studying People’s Motivation for Creative Labor Activity in the Socio-Humanitarian Thought]. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 11 (4). 90-109. (in Russian).
Valentey S.D. (2010). Ogranicheniya formirovaniya ekonomiki innovatsiy v Rossii [Limitations of innovation economy formation in Russia]. Bulletin of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. (6(36)). 10-18. (in Russian).
Woodman R.W., Sawyer J.E., Griffin R.W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity Academy of Management Review. (18). 293-321.
Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A. (2011). Sovmestnoe tvorchestvo kak resurs deyatelnosti organizatsii: sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovaniy [Collective creativity as organization's activity resource: situation and perspectives of study]. Psychological journal. 32 (1). 3-21. (in Russian).

Страница обновлена: 01.05.2025 в 05:43:47

Подробнее об авторе: