Assessing the effectiveness of cultural heritage management
Zavyalov D.V.1
, Zavyalova N.B.1, Saginova O. V.1, Tinkov S.A.1
1 Российский экономический университет им. Г.В. Плеханова
Download PDF | Downloads: 24
Journal paper
Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Volume 15, Number 2 (February 2025)
Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=80480013
Abstract:
The management of the processes of cultural heritage preservation is one of the priority tasks of the public authorities of the Russian Federation, the constituent territories of the Russian Federation and local self-government. The need to improve the effectiveness of public services stimulates the development of mechanisms and tools for their evaluation. Given the imperfection of the legislative framework on the issue of evaluating the effectiveness of public authorities engaged in cultural heritage preservation, it is necessary to develop a methodology for evaluation and self-evaluation of the management system, which provides for the analysis of the areas that are most important for the preservation of cultural heritage sites. The article examines the approaches and practices of a number of foreign countries and Russia to assess the effectiveness of preserving cultural heritage, identifies the main areas requiring improvement of management processes, and develops a concept for evaluating management effectiveness and a methodology for evaluating effectiveness. Open data from Moscow was used to test the methodology.
Keywords: cultural heritage management, efficiency, assessment, conservation and adaptive reuse, UNESCO, cultural heritage sites
JEL-classification: O33, Z10, Z11, Z18
References:
Enhancing our Heritage Toolkit. UNESCO. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://whc.unesco.org/en/eoh20/
Gurov M.B., Filatova N. V. (2017). Metodika otsenki effektivnosti raboty regionalnyh vlastey po pokazatelyu «Kulturnoe nasledie»: proekt [Methodology of assessment of efficiency of regional authorities work on cultural heritage indicator: project]. Kulturnoe nasledie Rossii. (1). 13-19. (in Russian).
International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Places of Interest (the Venice Charter). Retrieved December 17, 2024, from https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/venice_e.pdf
Lesh J. P. (2017). A Regional Conservation Manifesto, The Burra Charter and the Australian Re-invention of Urban Heritage Management, ca. 1975–1985 International Journal of Regional and Local History. (12(2)). 120–133. doi: 10.1080/20514530.2017.1400719.
Shitova E. A. (2023). Tendentsii kulturnoy politiki KNR v nachale XXI v [Trends in China's cultural policy at the beginning of the 21st century]. Trudy instituta istorii, arkheologii i etnografii DVO RAN. (42). 45-61. (in Russian). doi: 10.24412/2658-5960-2023-42-45-61.
Tarasova E. I. (2023). Sovremennaya kulturnaya politika Kitaya: tseli i vektory razvitiya [China’s modern cultural policy: goals and vectors of development]. MSLU Bulletin. (11 (879)). 158–165. (in Russian).
Zavyalova N. B., Zavyalov D. V., Saginova O. V. (2024). Sovremennye tekhnologii v protsessakh sokhraneniya obektov kulturnogo naslediya [Modern technology in cultural heritage preservation]. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 14 (3). 637-656. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/epp.14.3.120595.
Zhitenyov S. Yu. (2016). Sistemy upravleniya obektami kulturnogo naslediya [Management system objects of cultural heritage]. Zhurnal instituta naslediya. (3). 1-17. (in Russian).
Страница обновлена: 12.04.2025 в 15:38:03