Intention to professional standards implementation
Slobodskoy A.L.1, Gridneva M.A.1
, Petrov M.A.1
1 Санкт-Петербургский государственный экономический университет
Download PDF | Downloads: 17 | Citations: 7
Journal paper
Russian Journal of Labour Economics (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Volume 5, Number 3 (July-September 2018)
Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36366098
Cited: 7 by 28.06.2023
Abstract:
This article is devoted to the intentions and goals of the state in the implementation of professional standards. The authors propose to consider several main motives of the state, contributing to the introduction of another administrative method of regulation in the field of social and labor relations. First of all, it is the desire to link the skills of staff and the quality of goods and services, which in turn generates the so-called "institutional trap". In addition, we are talking about the incompleteness of the transition from paternalistic to liberal-market paradigm of social and labor relations. In particular, the main factors of influence on the relationship of such categories as "employee qualification" and "remuneration", as well as the fundamental difference in management styles inherent in two different paradigms, namely: administration and management. Another aspect that forces the state to introduce a professional standard is the problem of social justice in the field of remuneration, which the authors reveal in their article, including referring to international experience.
Keywords: state, social and labor relations, professional standard, employee qualification
JEL-classification: J88, J89, J53, J82
References:
George A. Akerlof. (1970). The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism Quarterly Journal of Economics. 84 488-500.
Gulevich O.A. (2012). Spravedlivost v organizatsii: usloviya i posledstviya [Organizational justice: antecedents and consequences]. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya. 2 (1). 58-70. (in Russian).
Nort D.S. (1997). Instituty, institutsionalnye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, institutional change and economic performance] M.: Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi Nachala. (in Russian).
Pirogov G.G., Efimov B.A. (2012). Sotsialnaya spravedlivost: genezis idey [Social justice: genesis of an idea]. Sociological Studies (Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia). (9). 3-11. (in Russian).
Polterovich V.M. (1998). Institutsionalnye lovushki - rezultat nevernoy strategii reform [Institutional traps - the result of wrong reform strategy]. Economics of Contemporary Russia. (S). 22-28. (in Russian).
Temnitskiy A.L. (2008). Tsennostnye orientiry spravedlivosti v oplate truda professionalov [Values of fairness in the remuneration of professionals]. Nauchnyy ekspert. (7-8). 34-43. (in Russian).
Teylor F. (1993). Printsipy nauchnogo upravleniya [Principles of scientific management] M.: Progress. (in Russian).
Veber M. (1990). Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected works] M.: Progress. (in Russian).
Мнушко З.Н., Пестун И.В. Кадровый менеджмент: принципы, задачи, направления, эффективностьProvisor.com.ua. (in Russian). Retrieved October 01, 2013, from http://www.provisor.com.ua/archive/2004/N10/art_27.php
Файоль А. Общее и промышленное управление. Часть II. Принципы и элементы управления. Глава 1. Общие принципы управленияGtmarket.ru. (in Russian). Retrieved from http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/5783/5787
Страница обновлена: 13.05.2025 в 03:09:35