Влияние системы трансактивной памяти на инновационность и управление знаниями в командах и организациях
Кадиров Н.Т.1, Филиппов В.В.1
1 Дальневосточный федеральный университет, г. Владивосток, о-в Русский
Скачать PDF | Загрузок: 32 | Цитирований: 2
Статья в журнале
Креативная экономика (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Том 10, Номер 12 (Декабрь 2016)
Эта статья проиндексирована РИНЦ, см. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27486969
Цитирований: 2 по состоянию на 05.09.2022
Аннотация:
В данном литературном обзоре мы показываем, что развитая система трансактивной памяти (СТП) в контексте групп и организаций помогает поддерживать инновационность и креативность, а также положительно влияет на процессы создания, обмена, применения и трансфера знаний.
Обзор основан на результатах 17 эмпирических исследований, опубликованных за период 2000-2016 гг. Мы отделили случаи прямой зависимости между СТП и другими переменными от случаев, в которых СТП выступает как переменная-модератор, таким образом систематизировав эффекты от развитой СТП.
Конфликты в результатах исследований, различия методологических подходов, а также роль стиля лидерства в извлечении выгоды из развитой СТП обсуждаются в тексте.
Эта статья будет интересна исследователям управления знаниями, инноваций и креативности.
Ключевые слова: управление знаниями, инновационность команд, система трансактивной памяти, трансактивная память
JEL-классификация: D83, O30, D85
Источники:
2. A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity / R. Bledow, M. Frese, N. Anderson [et al.] // Industrial and Organizational Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 2. – № 3. – P. 305-337.
3. Choi S. Y., Lee H., Yoo Y. The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: a field study // MIS quarterly. – 2010. – P. 855-870.
4. Donate M. J., De Pablo J. D. S. The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation // Journal of Business Research. – 2015. – Vol. 68. – № 2. – P. 360-370.
5. Donate M. J., Guadamillas F. An empirical study on the relationships between knowledge management, knowledge-oriented human resource practices and innovation // Knowledge Management Research & Practice. – 2015. – Vol. 13. – № 2. – P. 134-148.
6. Drucker P. F., Drucker P. F. Post-capitalist society. – Routledge, 1994.
7. Dunaway M. M., Sabherwal R. Understanding the role of Transactive Memory Systems and Knowledge Management Mechanisms on Team Performance. – 2012.
8. Duncan R. B. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation // The management of organization. – 1976. – № 1. – P. 167-188.
9. Multilevel influences of transactive memory systems on individual innovative behavior and team innovation / H. L. Fan, P. F. Chang, D. Albanese [et al.] // Thinking Skills and Creativity. – 2016. – № 19. – P. 49-59.
10. Gilley J. W., Shelton P. M., Gilley A. Developmental Leadership A New Perspective for Human Resource Development // Advances in Developing Human Resources. – 2011. – Vol. 13. – № 3. – P. 386-405.
11. First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity / F. Gino, L. Argote, E. Miron-Spektor [et al.] // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. – 2010. – Vol. 111. – № 2. – P. 102-115.
12. Gupta N., Hollingshead A. B. Differentiated versus integrated transactive memory effectiveness: It depends on the task // Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. – 2010. – Vol. 14. – № 4. – P. 384.
13. Heavey C., Simsek Z. Distributed Cognition in Top Management Teams and Organizational Ambidexterity the Influence of Transactive Memory Systems // Journal of Management. – 2014. – doi: 10.1177/0149206314545652
14. Huang C. C., Huang T. J. Knowledge sharing and KM effectiveness in technology R&D teams: transactive memory system and team-based outcome expectations perspectives // 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. – IEEE, 2007. – P. 2124-2128
15. Hülsheger U. R., Anderson N., Salgado J. F. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research // Journal of Applied psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 94. – № 5. – P. 1128.
16. Kibum Kwon, Daeyeon Cho How transactive memory systems relate to organizational innovation: the mediating role of developmental leadership // Journal of Knowledge Management. – 2016. – Vol. 20. – № 5.
17. Kotlarsky J., Van den Hooff B., Houtman L. Are we on the same page? Knowledge boundaries and transactive memory system development in cross-functional teams // Communication Research. – 2015. – Vol. 42. – № 3. – P. 319-344.
18. Lewis K. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems // Management science. – 2004. – Vol. 50. – № 11. – P. 1519-1533.
19. Lewis K., Herndon B. Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions // Organization Science. – 2011. – Vol. 22. – № 5. – P. 1254-1265.
20. Liang D. W., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. – 1995. – Vol. 21. – № 4. – P. 384-393.
21. Moreland R. L., Myaskovsky L. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? // Organizational behavior and human decision processes. – 2000. – Vol. 82. – № 1. – P. 117-133.
22. O’Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma // Research in organizational behavior. – 2008. – № 28. – P. 185-206.
23. Oshri I., Van Fenema P., Kotlarsky J. Knowledge transfer in globally distributed teams: the role of transactive memory // Information Systems Journal. – 2008. – Vol. 18. – № 6. – P. 593-616.
24. Peltokorpi V. Transactive memory systems // Review of General Psychology. – 2008. – Vol. 12. – № 4. – P. 378.
25. Peltokorpi V., Hasu M. Transactive memory systems and team innovation: A curvilinear approach // Team Performance Management. – 2014. – Vol. 20. – № 5/6. – P. 262-272.
26. Peltokorpi V., Hasu M. Transactive memory systems in research team innovation: A moderated mediation analysis // Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. – 2016. – № 39. – P. 1-12.
27. Qu G., Shen L., Bao X. Vendors’ team performance in software outsourcing projects: From the perspective of transactive memory systems behavioral characteristics // Nankai Business Review International. – 2014. – Vol. 5. – № 3. – P. 290-308.
28. Ren Y., Argote L. Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences // The Academy of management annals. – 2011. – Vol. 5. – № 1. – P. 189-229.
29. Schreiber M., Engelmann T. Knowledge and information awareness for initiating transactive memory system processes of computer-supported collaborating ad hoc groups // Computers in Human Behavior. – 2010. – Vol. 26. – № 6. – P. 1701-1709.
30. Assessing team performance: Moderating roles of transactive memory, hypercompetition, and emotional regulation / Y. H. Tsai, S. W. Joe, M. L. Chen [et al.] // Human Performance. – 2016. – Vol. 29. – № 2. – P. 89-105.
31. Tushman M. L., Anderson P. C., O’Reilly C. Technology cycles, innovation streams, and ambidextrous organizations: organization renewal through innovation streams and strategic change // Managing strategic innovation and change. – 1997. – № 3. – P. 23.
32. Wegner D. M. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind // Theories of group behavior. – New York: Springer, 1987. – P. 185-208.
33. Wegner D. M. A computer network model of human transactive memory // Social cognition. – 1995. – Vol. 13. – № 3. – P. 319.
34. Wegner D. M., Giuliano T., Hertel P. T. Cognitive interdependence in close relationships // Compatible and incompatible relationships. – New York: Springer, 1985. – P. 253-276.
35. Wiig K. M. Knowledge Management Foundations: Thinking about Thinking-how People and Organizations Represent, Create, and Use Knowledge. – Schema Press, Limited, 1994.
36. Дайл Д., Канджеми Д., Ковальски К. Трансформирующее действительность лидерство // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. – 2004. – Т. 1. – № 1.
37. К обществам знания: Доклад ЮНЕСКО. – ЮНЕСКО, 2005.
38. Kotlarsky J., van den Hooff B., Houtman L. Are we on the same page? Knowledge boundaries and transactive memory system development in cross-functional teams //Communication Research. – 2015. – Т. 42. – №. 3. – С. 319-344.
39. Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation //Journal of Applied Psychology. – 2003. – Т. 88. – №. 4. – С. 587.
40. Dunaway M. M., Sabherwal R. Understanding the role of Transactive Memory Systems and Knowledge Management Mechanisms on Team Performance. – 2012 – Thirty-Third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando 2012.
41. Bock G. W. et al. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate //MIS quarterly. – 2005. – С. 87-111.
42. Eisenbeiss S. A., van Knippenberg D., Boerner S. Transformational leadership and team innovation: integrating team climate principles //Journal of applied psychology. – 2008. – Т. 93. – №. 6. – С. 1438.
43. Li Y. H., Huang J. W. Exploitative and exploratory learning in transactive memory systems and project performance //Information & Management. – 2013. – Т. 50. – №. 6. – С. 304-313.
Страница обновлена: 03.09.2025 в 05:03:48
Download PDF | Downloads: 32 | Citations: 2
The influence of the transactive memory system on innovativeness and knowledge management in teams and organizations
Kadirov N.T., Filippov V.V.Journal paper
Creative Economy (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Volume 10, Number 12 (December 2016)
Abstract:
In this overview of the literature on the subject we demonstrate that a developed transactive memory system (TMS) in the context of groups and organizations enables to sustain innovativeness and creativity, and also has a positive impact on the processes of creation, exchange, application and transfer of knowledge.
The overview is based on the results of 17 empirical studies published in 2000–2016. We have separated the cases of direct dependence between TMS and other variables from those in which TMS acts as a conditional variable, thus, having systematized the effects of the developed TMS.
The conflicts resulting from the research, differences in methodological approaches, as well as the role of the leadership style in benefiting from the developed TMS have been discussed in the text.
This article will be of interest for the researchers of knowledge, management innovations and creativity.
Keywords: knowledge management, innovativeness of teams, transactive memory system, transactive memory
JEL-classification: D83, O30, D85