Влияние системы трансактивной памяти на инновационность и управление знаниями в командах и организациях
Кадиров Н.Т.1, Филиппов В.В.1
1 Дальневосточный федеральный университет, г. Владивосток, о-в Русский
Скачать PDF | Загрузок: 7 | Цитирований: 2
Статья в журнале
Креативная экономика (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Том 10, Номер 12 (Декабрь 2016)
Цитировать:
Кадиров Н.Т., Филиппов В.В. Влияние системы трансактивной памяти на инновационность и управление знаниями в командах и организациях // Креативная экономика. – 2016. – Том 10. – № 12. – С. 1417-1434. – doi: 10.18334/ce.10.12.37175.
Эта статья проиндексирована РИНЦ, см. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27486969
Цитирований: 2 по состоянию на 05.09.2022
Аннотация:
В данном литературном обзоре мы показываем, что развитая система трансактивной памяти (СТП) в контексте групп и организаций помогает поддерживать инновационность и креативность, а также положительно влияет на процессы создания, обмена, применения и трансфера знаний.
Обзор основан на результатах 17 эмпирических исследований, опубликованных за период 2000-2016 гг. Мы отделили случаи прямой зависимости между СТП и другими переменными от случаев, в которых СТП выступает как переменная-модератор, таким образом систематизировав эффекты от развитой СТП.
Конфликты в результатах исследований, различия методологических подходов, а также роль стиля лидерства в извлечении выгоды из развитой СТП обсуждаются в тексте.
Эта статья будет интересна исследователям управления знаниями, инноваций и креативности.
Ключевые слова: управление знаниями, инновационность команд, система трансактивной памяти, трансактивная память
JEL-классификация: D83, O30, D85
Источники:
1. Bachrach D. G., Mullins R. R., Rapp A. A. Intangible sales team resources: Investing in team social capital and transactive memory for market-driven behaviors, norms and performance // Industrial Marketing Management. – 2016. – doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.08.001
2. A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity / R. Bledow, M. Frese, N. Anderson [et al.] // Industrial and Organizational Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 2. – № 3. – P. 305-337.
3. Choi S. Y., Lee H., Yoo Y. The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: a field study // MIS quarterly. – 2010. – P. 855-870.
4. Donate M. J., De Pablo J. D. S. The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation // Journal of Business Research. – 2015. – Vol. 68. – № 2. – P. 360-370.
5. Donate M. J., Guadamillas F. An empirical study on the relationships between knowledge management, knowledge-oriented human resource practices and innovation // Knowledge Management Research & Practice. – 2015. – Vol. 13. – № 2. – P. 134-148.
6. Drucker P. F., Drucker P. F. Post-capitalist society. – Routledge, 1994.
7. Dunaway M. M., Sabherwal R. Understanding the role of Transactive Memory Systems and Knowledge Management Mechanisms on Team Performance. – 2012.
8. Duncan R. B. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation // The management of organization. – 1976. – № 1. – P. 167-188.
9. Multilevel influences of transactive memory systems on individual innovative behavior and team innovation / H. L. Fan, P. F. Chang, D. Albanese [et al.] // Thinking Skills and Creativity. – 2016. – № 19. – P. 49-59.
10. Gilley J. W., Shelton P. M., Gilley A. Developmental Leadership A New Perspective for Human Resource Development // Advances in Developing Human Resources. – 2011. – Vol. 13. – № 3. – P. 386-405.
11. First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity / F. Gino, L. Argote, E. Miron-Spektor [et al.] // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. – 2010. – Vol. 111. – № 2. – P. 102-115.
12. Gupta N., Hollingshead A. B. Differentiated versus integrated transactive memory effectiveness: It depends on the task // Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. – 2010. – Vol. 14. – № 4. – P. 384.
13. Heavey C., Simsek Z. Distributed Cognition in Top Management Teams and Organizational Ambidexterity the Influence of Transactive Memory Systems // Journal of Management. – 2014. – doi: 10.1177/0149206314545652
14. Huang C. C., Huang T. J. Knowledge sharing and KM effectiveness in technology R&D teams: transactive memory system and team-based outcome expectations perspectives // 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. – IEEE, 2007. – P. 2124-2128
15. Hülsheger U. R., Anderson N., Salgado J. F. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research // Journal of Applied psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 94. – № 5. – P. 1128.
16. Kibum Kwon, Daeyeon Cho How transactive memory systems relate to organizational innovation: the mediating role of developmental leadership // Journal of Knowledge Management. – 2016. – Vol. 20. – № 5.
17. Kotlarsky J., Van den Hooff B., Houtman L. Are we on the same page? Knowledge boundaries and transactive memory system development in cross-functional teams // Communication Research. – 2015. – Vol. 42. – № 3. – P. 319-344.
18. Lewis K. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems // Management science. – 2004. – Vol. 50. – № 11. – P. 1519-1533.
19. Lewis K., Herndon B. Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions // Organization Science. – 2011. – Vol. 22. – № 5. – P. 1254-1265.
20. Liang D. W., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. – 1995. – Vol. 21. – № 4. – P. 384-393.
21. Moreland R. L., Myaskovsky L. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? // Organizational behavior and human decision processes. – 2000. – Vol. 82. – № 1. – P. 117-133.
22. O’Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma // Research in organizational behavior. – 2008. – № 28. – P. 185-206.
23. Oshri I., Van Fenema P., Kotlarsky J. Knowledge transfer in globally distributed teams: the role of transactive memory // Information Systems Journal. – 2008. – Vol. 18. – № 6. – P. 593-616.
24. Peltokorpi V. Transactive memory systems // Review of General Psychology. – 2008. – Vol. 12. – № 4. – P. 378.
25. Peltokorpi V., Hasu M. Transactive memory systems and team innovation: A curvilinear approach // Team Performance Management. – 2014. – Vol. 20. – № 5/6. – P. 262-272.
26. Peltokorpi V., Hasu M. Transactive memory systems in research team innovation: A moderated mediation analysis // Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. – 2016. – № 39. – P. 1-12.
27. Qu G., Shen L., Bao X. Vendors’ team performance in software outsourcing projects: From the perspective of transactive memory systems behavioral characteristics // Nankai Business Review International. – 2014. – Vol. 5. – № 3. – P. 290-308.
28. Ren Y., Argote L. Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences // The Academy of management annals. – 2011. – Vol. 5. – № 1. – P. 189-229.
29. Schreiber M., Engelmann T. Knowledge and information awareness for initiating transactive memory system processes of computer-supported collaborating ad hoc groups // Computers in Human Behavior. – 2010. – Vol. 26. – № 6. – P. 1701-1709.
30. Assessing team performance: Moderating roles of transactive memory, hypercompetition, and emotional regulation / Y. H. Tsai, S. W. Joe, M. L. Chen [et al.] // Human Performance. – 2016. – Vol. 29. – № 2. – P. 89-105.
31. Tushman M. L., Anderson P. C., O’Reilly C. Technology cycles, innovation streams, and ambidextrous organizations: organization renewal through innovation streams and strategic change // Managing strategic innovation and change. – 1997. – № 3. – P. 23.
32. Wegner D. M. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind // Theories of group behavior. – New York: Springer, 1987. – P. 185-208.
33. Wegner D. M. A computer network model of human transactive memory // Social cognition. – 1995. – Vol. 13. – № 3. – P. 319.
34. Wegner D. M., Giuliano T., Hertel P. T. Cognitive interdependence in close relationships // Compatible and incompatible relationships. – New York: Springer, 1985. – P. 253-276.
35. Wiig K. M. Knowledge Management Foundations: Thinking about Thinking-how People and Organizations Represent, Create, and Use Knowledge. – Schema Press, Limited, 1994.
36. Дайл Д., Канджеми Д., Ковальски К. Трансформирующее действительность лидерство // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. – 2004. – Т. 1. – № 1.
37. К обществам знания: Доклад ЮНЕСКО. – ЮНЕСКО, 2005.
38. Kotlarsky J., van den Hooff B., Houtman L. Are we on the same page? Knowledge boundaries and transactive memory system development in cross-functional teams //Communication Research. – 2015. – Т. 42. – №. 3. – С. 319-344.
39. Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation //Journal of Applied Psychology. – 2003. – Т. 88. – №. 4. – С. 587.
40. Dunaway M. M., Sabherwal R. Understanding the role of Transactive Memory Systems and Knowledge Management Mechanisms on Team Performance. – 2012 – Thirty-Third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando 2012.
41. Bock G. W. et al. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate //MIS quarterly. – 2005. – С. 87-111.
42. Eisenbeiss S. A., van Knippenberg D., Boerner S. Transformational leadership and team innovation: integrating team climate principles //Journal of applied psychology. – 2008. – Т. 93. – №. 6. – С. 1438.
43. Li Y. H., Huang J. W. Exploitative and exploratory learning in transactive memory systems and project performance //Information & Management. – 2013. – Т. 50. – №. 6. – С. 304-313.
2. A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity / R. Bledow, M. Frese, N. Anderson [et al.] // Industrial and Organizational Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 2. – № 3. – P. 305-337.
3. Choi S. Y., Lee H., Yoo Y. The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: a field study // MIS quarterly. – 2010. – P. 855-870.
4. Donate M. J., De Pablo J. D. S. The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation // Journal of Business Research. – 2015. – Vol. 68. – № 2. – P. 360-370.
5. Donate M. J., Guadamillas F. An empirical study on the relationships between knowledge management, knowledge-oriented human resource practices and innovation // Knowledge Management Research & Practice. – 2015. – Vol. 13. – № 2. – P. 134-148.
6. Drucker P. F., Drucker P. F. Post-capitalist society. – Routledge, 1994.
7. Dunaway M. M., Sabherwal R. Understanding the role of Transactive Memory Systems and Knowledge Management Mechanisms on Team Performance. – 2012.
8. Duncan R. B. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation // The management of organization. – 1976. – № 1. – P. 167-188.
9. Multilevel influences of transactive memory systems on individual innovative behavior and team innovation / H. L. Fan, P. F. Chang, D. Albanese [et al.] // Thinking Skills and Creativity. – 2016. – № 19. – P. 49-59.
10. Gilley J. W., Shelton P. M., Gilley A. Developmental Leadership A New Perspective for Human Resource Development // Advances in Developing Human Resources. – 2011. – Vol. 13. – № 3. – P. 386-405.
11. First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity / F. Gino, L. Argote, E. Miron-Spektor [et al.] // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. – 2010. – Vol. 111. – № 2. – P. 102-115.
12. Gupta N., Hollingshead A. B. Differentiated versus integrated transactive memory effectiveness: It depends on the task // Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. – 2010. – Vol. 14. – № 4. – P. 384.
13. Heavey C., Simsek Z. Distributed Cognition in Top Management Teams and Organizational Ambidexterity the Influence of Transactive Memory Systems // Journal of Management. – 2014. – doi: 10.1177/0149206314545652
14. Huang C. C., Huang T. J. Knowledge sharing and KM effectiveness in technology R&D teams: transactive memory system and team-based outcome expectations perspectives // 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. – IEEE, 2007. – P. 2124-2128
15. Hülsheger U. R., Anderson N., Salgado J. F. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research // Journal of Applied psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 94. – № 5. – P. 1128.
16. Kibum Kwon, Daeyeon Cho How transactive memory systems relate to organizational innovation: the mediating role of developmental leadership // Journal of Knowledge Management. – 2016. – Vol. 20. – № 5.
17. Kotlarsky J., Van den Hooff B., Houtman L. Are we on the same page? Knowledge boundaries and transactive memory system development in cross-functional teams // Communication Research. – 2015. – Vol. 42. – № 3. – P. 319-344.
18. Lewis K. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems // Management science. – 2004. – Vol. 50. – № 11. – P. 1519-1533.
19. Lewis K., Herndon B. Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions // Organization Science. – 2011. – Vol. 22. – № 5. – P. 1254-1265.
20. Liang D. W., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. – 1995. – Vol. 21. – № 4. – P. 384-393.
21. Moreland R. L., Myaskovsky L. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? // Organizational behavior and human decision processes. – 2000. – Vol. 82. – № 1. – P. 117-133.
22. O’Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma // Research in organizational behavior. – 2008. – № 28. – P. 185-206.
23. Oshri I., Van Fenema P., Kotlarsky J. Knowledge transfer in globally distributed teams: the role of transactive memory // Information Systems Journal. – 2008. – Vol. 18. – № 6. – P. 593-616.
24. Peltokorpi V. Transactive memory systems // Review of General Psychology. – 2008. – Vol. 12. – № 4. – P. 378.
25. Peltokorpi V., Hasu M. Transactive memory systems and team innovation: A curvilinear approach // Team Performance Management. – 2014. – Vol. 20. – № 5/6. – P. 262-272.
26. Peltokorpi V., Hasu M. Transactive memory systems in research team innovation: A moderated mediation analysis // Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. – 2016. – № 39. – P. 1-12.
27. Qu G., Shen L., Bao X. Vendors’ team performance in software outsourcing projects: From the perspective of transactive memory systems behavioral characteristics // Nankai Business Review International. – 2014. – Vol. 5. – № 3. – P. 290-308.
28. Ren Y., Argote L. Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences // The Academy of management annals. – 2011. – Vol. 5. – № 1. – P. 189-229.
29. Schreiber M., Engelmann T. Knowledge and information awareness for initiating transactive memory system processes of computer-supported collaborating ad hoc groups // Computers in Human Behavior. – 2010. – Vol. 26. – № 6. – P. 1701-1709.
30. Assessing team performance: Moderating roles of transactive memory, hypercompetition, and emotional regulation / Y. H. Tsai, S. W. Joe, M. L. Chen [et al.] // Human Performance. – 2016. – Vol. 29. – № 2. – P. 89-105.
31. Tushman M. L., Anderson P. C., O’Reilly C. Technology cycles, innovation streams, and ambidextrous organizations: organization renewal through innovation streams and strategic change // Managing strategic innovation and change. – 1997. – № 3. – P. 23.
32. Wegner D. M. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind // Theories of group behavior. – New York: Springer, 1987. – P. 185-208.
33. Wegner D. M. A computer network model of human transactive memory // Social cognition. – 1995. – Vol. 13. – № 3. – P. 319.
34. Wegner D. M., Giuliano T., Hertel P. T. Cognitive interdependence in close relationships // Compatible and incompatible relationships. – New York: Springer, 1985. – P. 253-276.
35. Wiig K. M. Knowledge Management Foundations: Thinking about Thinking-how People and Organizations Represent, Create, and Use Knowledge. – Schema Press, Limited, 1994.
36. Дайл Д., Канджеми Д., Ковальски К. Трансформирующее действительность лидерство // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. – 2004. – Т. 1. – № 1.
37. К обществам знания: Доклад ЮНЕСКО. – ЮНЕСКО, 2005.
38. Kotlarsky J., van den Hooff B., Houtman L. Are we on the same page? Knowledge boundaries and transactive memory system development in cross-functional teams //Communication Research. – 2015. – Т. 42. – №. 3. – С. 319-344.
39. Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation //Journal of Applied Psychology. – 2003. – Т. 88. – №. 4. – С. 587.
40. Dunaway M. M., Sabherwal R. Understanding the role of Transactive Memory Systems and Knowledge Management Mechanisms on Team Performance. – 2012 – Thirty-Third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando 2012.
41. Bock G. W. et al. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate //MIS quarterly. – 2005. – С. 87-111.
42. Eisenbeiss S. A., van Knippenberg D., Boerner S. Transformational leadership and team innovation: integrating team climate principles //Journal of applied psychology. – 2008. – Т. 93. – №. 6. – С. 1438.
43. Li Y. H., Huang J. W. Exploitative and exploratory learning in transactive memory systems and project performance //Information & Management. – 2013. – Т. 50. – №. 6. – С. 304-313.
Страница обновлена: 15.07.2024 в 10:11:25