Technological sovereignty of the branches of the military-industrial complex: a national idea and a factor of technological leadership
Rodina I.B.1
1 Автономная некоммерческая организация высшего образования «Московский гуманитарный университет»
Download PDF | Downloads: 11
Journal paper
Leadership and Management (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Volume 12, Number 4 (April 2025)
Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=82282751
Abstract:
The purpose of the study was to identify the technological sovereignty of the branches of the Russian military-industrial complex as a key condition for ensuring the national technological leadership. The methods of statistical observation and comparative analysis, systematization, analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction are used in the article.
The canons of system analysis allow to interpret import substitution as a component of technological sovereignty, and counter-sanctions as a catalyst of innovative development of industries.
The urgency of the problem of technological sovereignty stimulates the interest of various representatives of society in it: the country's leadership, corporations, regional and party leaders, the scientific and university community. An excursion into the existing views on the phenomenon of technological sovereignty predetermined the author's position on the formation of prerequisites for the accelerated development and implementation of technological innovations aimed at ensuring national security, defense capability, and improving the quality of life of Russian households.
Keywords: sanctions restrictions, technological sovereignty, import substitution, reverse engineering, industrial cooperation
JEL-classification: F51, F52, H56, L16, L32, O32
References:
Andreev V.N. (2024). Conceptual model of technological capital management of machine-building companies in the context of ensuring the sovereignty of domestic industry. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 14 (7). 3663-3682. doi: 10.18334/epp.14.7.121109.
Andreev V.N. (2024). Structuring the methodology of technological capital management of machine-building companies in the context of ensuring the sovereignty of domestic industry. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 14 (8). 4463-4476. doi: 10.18334/epp.14.8.121149.
Baydarov D.Yu., Polosin A.V., Faykov D.Yu. (2023). Formation of a new model of the domestic economy in the context of technological sovereignty: principles and mechanisms. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 13 (2). 669-688. doi: 10.18334/vinec.13.2.117949.
Belyakov G.P., Belyakov S.A., Shpak A.S. (2019). Public administration of scientific and technological development: foreign experience. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 9 (3). 657-672. doi: 10.18334/vinec.9.3.40856.
Bondarenko V.M. (2022). Opportunities and limitations of applying the achievements of scientific and technological progress for the development of Russia. Economic security. 5 (4). 1433-1450. doi: 10.18334/ecsec.5.4.116350.
Bondarenko V.M. (2022). Scientific and technological sovereignty of Russia: conditions and ways of achievement. Theoretical economy. (10). 78-91. doi: 10.52957/22213260_2022_10_78.
Braun M., Hummel P. (2022). Sovereign power: Artificial intelligence and Europe’s digital sovereignty Contested Spatialities of Digital Sovereignty, Geopolitics. 14-19. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2022.2050070.
Braun M., Hummel P. (2022). Sovereign power: Artificial intelligence and Europe’s digital sovereignty Contested Spatialities of Digital Sovereignty, Geopolitics. 14-19. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2022.2050070.
Christakis T. (2020). European digital sovereignty: Successfully navigating between the «Brussels effect» and Europe’s quest for strategic autonomy SSRN Journal. (7). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3748098.
Crespi F., Caravella S., Menghini M., Salvatori C. (2021). Menghini M., Salvatori C. European Technological Sovereignty: An Emerging Framework for Policy Strategy Intereconomics. 56 (6). 348-354. doi: 10.1007/s10272-021-1013-6.
Davydenko E.V. (2025). Scientific and technological cooperation in the Eurasian Economic Union in the context of technological sovereignty. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 15 (1). 25-38. doi: 10.18334/vinec.15.1.122483.
Dementev V.E. (2022). Prospects for russia under the digital domination of china and the united states. Problems of forecasting. (4(193)). 6-17. doi: 10.47711/0868-6351-193-6-17.
Dementev V.E. (2023). Technological sovereignty and priorities of localization of production. Terra Economicus. 21 (1). 6-48. doi: 10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-1--6-18.
Eshtokin S.V. (2022). End-to-end technologies of the digital economy as a factor in shaping a country's technological sovereignty. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 12 (3). 1301-1314. doi: 10.18334/vinec.12.3.116193.
Floridi L. (2021). The European legislation on AI: A brief analysis of its philosophical approach Philosophy & Technology. (34). 215-222. doi: 10.1007/s13347-021-00460-9.
Jakob Edler, Knut Blind, Henning Kroll, Torben Schubert ((2023). Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy: Defining rationales, ends and means Research Policy. 52 (6). 104765.
Khammer M., Champi Dzh. (2011). Corporate Reengineering: The Manifesto of a Revolution in Business Moscow: Izdatelstvo «Mann, Ivanov i Ferber».
Kikot-Glukhodedova T.V., Polomoshnova A.A. (2024). Features of the strategy of scientific and technological development as an element of ensuring national security. Economic Security Bulletin. (3). 84-87.
Martinovich N.V., Petukhova M.V., Korneychuk K.A., Boyko G.M. (223). Strategies for ensuring technological sovereignty at the current stage. Vestnik Povolzhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie. (2). 28-39. doi: 10.25686/2306-2800.2023.2.28.
Medzhidov Z.U. (2022). Forms of public-private partnership in Russia: a comparative study. Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of RAS. (3). 73-95. doi: 10.52180/2073_6487_2022_3_73_95.
Mindeli L.E., Ostapyuk S.F., Fetisov V.P. (2018). Global trends and challenges determining scientific and technological development of Russia. Economic Security Bulletin. (5). 7-13.
Petrov M.N., Filippov Ya.S. (2023). Technological sovereignty: basic principles of the concept of national scientific and technological security. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 13 (3). 1185-1198. doi: 10.18334/vinec.13.3.118646.
Rodina I.B., Urunov A.A., Vladimirova A.F. (2018). Adaptation of the russian national economy to the conditions of mutual economic sanctions (Russia, Moscow). Problems of modern economics. (2). 60-65.
Selezneva I.E., Klochkov V.V. (2023). Analysis of threats to Russia's economic security related to the problems of public administration of scientific and technological development. Economic security. 6 (3). 941-962. doi: 10.18334/ecsec.6.3.118636.
Shmakov V.I. (2024). Main directions of modern transformation and modernization of russian society, ways to overcome the systemic crisis in the context of technological revolution: alternative strategic development models. Public administration. Electronic Bulletin. (105). 93-104. doi: 10.55959/MSU2070-1381-105-2024-93-104.
Shushunova T.N., Sitnikov E.V. (2023). Transformation of the domestic economic model to ensure technological sovereignty. Economic security. 6 (3). 925-940. doi: 10.18334/ecsec.6.3.118348.
Stoletov O.V. (2022). Strategies for digital development of key states of the global south in the context of u.s.-chinese technological rivalry. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 22 (2). 221-237. doi: 10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2--221-237.
Yakovets Yu.V. (2018). The seven factors for the implementation of the strategy of scientific and technological breakthrough in Russia. Strategic Priorities. (3). 89-101.
Zemskov V.V. (2023). Scientific and technological sovereignty: new challenges and solutions. Economic security. 6 (4). 1321-1334. doi: 10.18334/ecsec.6.4.118817.
Страница обновлена: 02.06.2025 в 12:48:26