Personnel assessment and results of its activity during the creation of differentiated system of remuneration in personnel management

Malakhova A.A.¹, Starova O.V.¹, Arefyev V.A.¹
¹ Сибирский федеральный университет, Russia

Download PDF | Downloads: 33 | Citations: 22

Journal paper

Russian Journal of Labour Economics ^{(РИНЦ, ВАК)}
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 7, Number 1 (January 2020)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42460737
Cited: 22 by 07.12.2023

Abstract:
In this paper we study the evaluation of personnel and the results of its activity as a key factor in choosing the most optimal system of remuneration in personnel management. A critical analysis of the existing approaches to the construction of a differentiated system of remuneration from the point of view of the effectiveness of staff motivation, universality of the scope of application of the methods, taking into account the contribution of a particular employee to achieve a joint result, the objectivity of establishing criteria and assessing the employee's personal effectiveness, the complexity of the method in determining the level of remuneration is conducted. On the basis of these criteria, the evaluation of both widely used approaches to the construction of a differentiated wage system (grading, KPI) and less studied systems (SPB, PFP) was carried out. It is recommended to supplement the construction of a differentiated remuneration system with the "5+" method, which allows to assess the employee's personal efficiency. This system can be considered as an independent approach to the construction of a differentiated wage system, and complement the KPI indicators. In conclusion recommendations on the choice of appropriate systems from the point of view of personnel management efficiency are given.

Keywords: assessment of personnel labour, material motivation, employee's personal efficiency, key performance indicators

JEL-classification: M12, M54, J24

References:

Gersh M.V. (2016). Klyuchevye pokazateli effektivnosti [Key performance indicators]. Otdel kadrov kommercheskoy organizatsii. (10). 61 - 66. (in Russian).
Goroschenko V.V. (2017). Motivatsiya truda kak faktor povysheniya effektivnosti upravleniya personalom [Motivation of labour as a factor of personnel management efficiency gain ]. Vestnik Instituta ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy. (3). 73-80. (in Russian).
Kibanov A. Ya. (2019). Ekonomika upravleniya personalom [Economics of personnel management] (in Russian).
Ladeyschikova A.A., Kim S.V. (2018). Teoreticheskie aspekty postroeniya sistemy motivatsii personala v rossiyskikh organizatsiyakh [Theoretical aspects of the system of personnel motivation in Russian organizations]. Science. (6). 282-288. (in Russian).
Malakhova A.A., Kravtsov D.I., Zyablikov D.V. (2018). Otsenka lichnoy effektivnosti sotrudnika v sisteme audita personala [Assessment of the employee''s personal effectiveness in the personnel audit system]. Creative economy. (9). 1491-1500. (in Russian).
Mamonov E. (2016). Rabota s torgovym personalom v krizis [Work with sales staff in crisis]. Kadrovaya sluzhba i upravlenie personalom predpriyatiya. (9). 54 - 62. (in Russian).
Sochneva E.N. (2016). Chelovecheskiy kapital: problemy izmereniya i rosta v rossiyskoy ekonomike [Human capital: problems of measurement and growth in the Russian economy] (in Russian).
Timakova K.A., Garbuzova T.A. (2018). Motivatsiya truda kak osnova upravleniya personalom [Motivation of labour as the basis of personnel management] XXXI International Plekhanov readings. Material readings: in 3 volumes. 92-95. (in Russian).
Yandiev Kh.A. (2018). Upravlenie personalom: motivatsiya truda [Personnel management: labor motivation]. Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship. (8). 1008-1012. (in Russian).

Страница обновлена: 25.04.2025 в 05:56:46

Подробнее об авторах: