Analysis of the factors of scientific-technical and scientific-technological competitiveness of manufacturing industries of Russia and of the leading industrial countries

Bagrinovskiy K.A., Nikonova A.A. (2015). Konkurentnye preimuschestva rossiyskoy ekonomiki – bazis eyo ustoychivogo razvitiya [Competitive advantages of the Russian economy as a basis for its sustainable development]. “Economic Policy” Journal. (1). 43-64. (in Russian).
Dontsova O.I., Zasko V.N. (2018). Klasternaya strategiya povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti natsionalnoy ekonomiki kak institutsionalnaya predposylka privlecheniya chastnogo kapitala v ekonomiku Rossii [Cluster strategy improve the competitiveness of the national economy as an institutional prerequisite for attracting private capital in the Russian economy]. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. (5). (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/rp.19.5.39051.
Drobot E.V. (2012). Evolyutsiya teorii natsionalnoy konkurentosposobnosti [The evolution of the theory of national competitiveness]. Journal of International Economic Affairs. (2). 27-40. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/.37337.
Drobot E.V. (2012). Kontseptualnaya model formirovaniya konkurentosposobnosti prigranichnogo regiona [Conceptual model of formation of competitiveness of the border region]. Journal of International Economic Affairs. (2). 6-10. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/.37376.
Drobot E.V., Losinkova V. A., Pospelova A. L., Utyabaeva E. R., Fedash K.A. (2018). Obzor klyuchevyh podkhodov k klassifikatsii stran mira i sravnitelnyy analiz osnovnyh makroekonomicheskikh pokazateley veduschikh mirovyh ekonomik [An overview of the key approaches to the classification of countries and a comparative analysis of the main macroeconomic indicators of the leading world economies]. Journal of International Economic Affairs. (2). 105-138. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/eo.8.2.39014.
Gelvanovskiy M. (2006). Konkurentosposobnost: mikro-, mezo i makrourovni. Voprosy metodologii [Competitiveness: micro, meso and macro levels. Issues of methodology]. Higher education in Russia. (1). 32-40. (in Russian).
Kazakova M.V., Pospelova E.A. (2017). Kachestvo infrastruktury kak odno iz ogranicheniy ekonomicheskogo rosta: sravnitelnyy analiz Rossii i stran mira [The quality of infrastructure as one of the limitations of economic growth: a comparative analysis of Russia and countries of the world]. Journal of International Economic Affairs. (3). 247-268. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/eo.7.3.38071.
Kraft Y., Zaytsev A.V. (2018). Globalnye izmeneniya ekonomicheskogo prostranstva i razvitie innovatsionnyh proizvodstv v usloviyakh mirovoy turbulentnosti [Global changes in the economic space and the development of innovative production in the world turbulence]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. (2). 185-196. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/vinec.8.3.39228.
Medovnikov D., Mekhanik A. (2014). Производительные силы, подъем! Эксперт. (27).
OECD,Bilateral Trade Database by Industry and End-use (BTDIxE). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/Estimating_BilatFlows_byIndEndUse.pdf
Pleschenko V.I. (2011). Protsess zakupok, ego rol i mesto v khozyaystvennoy deyatelnosti predpriyatiy obrabatyvayuschey promyshlennosti [The procurement process, its role and place in the business of manufacturing industries]. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. (6). 18-29. (in Russian).
Safiulin A.R., Kotenkova S.N., Novenkova A.Z. (2016). Rol promyshlennoy politiki v usloviyakh intensivnogo razvitiya konkurentnyh preimuschestv territorii [The role of industrial policy in conditions of intensive development of competitive advantages of the territory]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SpbGPU. (1). 134-146. (in Russian).
Tolkachev S. A. (2015). Dve modeli neoindustrializatsii: Germaniya – «Industriya 4.0», SShA – «Promyshlennyy internet» [Two models of the new industrial revolution: Germany Industry 4.0, the United States – the "Industrial Internet"]. The Economist. (9). 13-23. (in Russian).
Tolkachev S.A., Bykov A. A., Glukhova N. M.  (2019). Neoindustrializatsiya i servisizatsiya: est li protivorechie? [Neoindustrialization and servicesize: is there a contradiction?]. The world of new economy. (3). 54-55. (in Russian).
Varshavskiy A.E. (2014). Problemnye innovatsii: riski dlya chelovechestva. Ekonomicheskie, sotsialnye i eticheskie aspekty [The problematic of the innovation: the risks to humanity. Economic, social and ethical aspects] (in Russian).
Vernikov V.A., Khambazarov Sh.B. (2018). Intellektualno-informatsionnoe predprinimatelstvo kak drayver strategicheskogo razvitiya ekonomik mirovyh stran [Intellectual information entrepreneurship as a driver of strategic development of economies of world countries]. Ekonomika i sotsium: sovremennye modeli razvitiya. (1). 24-35. (in Russian).
Zavyalov D.V., Zavyalova N.B., Kiseleva E.V. (2019). Tsifrovye platformy kak instrument i uslovie konkurentosposobnosti strany na mirovom rynke tovarov i uslug [Digital platform as an instrument and condition for the country's competitiveness in the world market of goods and services]. Journal of International Economic Affairs. (2). 443-454. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/eo.9.2.40608.
Минпромторг России. Retrieved from http://minpromtorg.gov.ru/press-centre/news/#!v_2018_godu_predpriyatiya_selhozmasha_uvelichili_vneshnie_postavki_na_40
Минпромторг России. Поддержка инвестиций в экспорт станет «мейнстримом» промышленной политики на ближайшие годы. Retrieved from http://minpromtorg.gov.ru/presscentre/news/#!podderzhka_investiciy_v_eksport_stanet_meynstrimom_promyshlennoy_politiki_na_blizhayshie_gody
Оэср. Retrieved from Industry and Services>Structural Analysis (STAN) Databases>Bilateral Trade in Goods by Industry and End-use (BTDIxE), ISIC Rev.4">https://stats.oecd.org/>Industry and Services>Structural Analysis (STAN) Databases>Bilateral Trade in Goods by Industry and End-use (BTDIxE), ISIC Rev.4
Привалов А. Отстали почти безнадежно. Retrieved from https://expert.ru/2019/07/26/otstali-pochti-beznadyozhno/