Management of balanced economic growth of large industrial structures based on the concept of corporate citizenship

Lyasnikov N.V.¹, Lyasnikova Yu.V.²
¹ Института проблем рынка РАН
² Московский политехнический университет, Russia

Journal paper

Economics and society: contemporary models of development ^(РИНЦ)
опубликовать статью

Volume 8, Number 2 (April-June 2018)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36544037

Abstract:
Purpose: based on current research, management of balanced economic growth of large industrial structures based on the concept of corporate citizenship has been studied. Materials and methods: the methodological basis of this article is research on managing the balanced economic growth of large industrial structures, as well as the impact of the concept of corporate citizenship on their economic growth. Results: this article defines the role and importance of corporate citizenship, and also identifies the factor of influence of corporate citizenship on the economic growth of large industrial structures. In this article, applied methods such as analysis and synthesis, systematization and comparison. Conclusions: one of the most important factors that impose an increasingly significant imprint on the nature of social and labor relations in Russia is the transnationalization of our large business, the acquisition of the features and characteristics of transnational companies by the most efficient companies and corporations. Today, it is customary to talk not just about “human”, but about “social capital”, and, of course, its quality is largely determined by the state of social and labor relations and the role that trade unions play in these relations. If we raise the question more broadly, then we come here directly to the concept of corporate citizenship, which is increasingly in demand today. Following this concept gives a serious chance to trade unions in Western TNCs and in Western countries as a whole to overcome the crisis that they are experiencing in the transition from industrial to post-industrial society, from the “old” economy to the “new” economy. One of the major industrial structures in which management is carried out on the basis of corporate citizenship is OOO LUKOIL-Perm, a subsidiary of the company LUKOIL. And behind this principled position are real business. LUKOIL-Perm LLC and its people are doing a lot to establish close, constructive relations with the residents of those villages and territories where it carries out its production activities. And this is not just a “distribution of money”, financing the construction of roads, hospitals, schools, etc. It is also “building bridges” between divisions of the company and the local community, creating a kind of cells of that common citizenship, the focus on the formation of which is the essence of the concept. The findings and research results can be used to introduce the concept of corporate citizenship for the most fruitful management of balanced economic growth of large industrial structures.

Keywords: management, economic growth, large industrial structures, transnational companies, concepts of corporate citizenship

References:

1. Kuznetsov A.V. Transnational corporations in the world [Electronic resource]. World and National Economy. 2014; 2(29).
2. Peregudov S.P., Semenenko I.S. Corporate citizenship as a new form of business, society and government relations. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2008.
3. Strezhneva M.V., Prokhorenko I.L. Economic Management in the European Union: Institutional and Political Aspects. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2013.
4. Schlichter A.A. Ideological foundations and practices of socially-oriented activities of corporations and charitable foundations in the West and in Russia. Society and Economics. 2017; (12):76–90.
5. System of continuous corporate training / Official site of the United Aircraft Building Corporation [Electronic resource]. Available from: http: //www. uacrussia. ru / en / staff_policy / corporate_learning [Accessed 10th October 2018]
6. Aino Kianto, Paavo Ritala, John-Christopher Spender, Mika Vanhala. The interaction of intellectual capital assets and knowledge management practices in organizational value creation. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2014; 15(3):362–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-05-2014-0059
7. Dudin M.N., Lyasnikov N.V., Dzhurabaeva G.K., Dzhurabaev K.T., Reshetov K.Yu. Improving the innovative strategy of interaction of large industrial enterprises and small entrepreneurship in the agro-industrial sector. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia. 2015; 12(1):159–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13005/bbra/1647
8. Huergo Elena, Jaumandreu Jordi. Firms’ age, process innovation and productivity growth. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2004; 22(4):541–559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2003.12.002
9. Expert vs. general working sample differences in KSAO improvability ratings and relationships with measures relevant to occupational and organizational psychology. Journal of Occupational and Organization Psychology. 2008; 81(4):813–829.
10. Field J. Social capital and lifelong learning. England: Policy Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgvrm
11. Berzkalne Irina, Zelgalve Elvira. Intellectual Capital and Company Value. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; (110):887–896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.934.

Страница обновлена: 27.04.2025 в 23:21:51

Подробнее об авторах: