Development of the Institute of corporate citizenship in order to stimulate economic growth of large industrial structures

Senin A.S.¹, Nikandrova O.A.¹
¹ Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации (РАНХиГС), Russia

Download PDF | Downloads: 13

Journal paper

Economics and society: contemporary models of development ^(РИНЦ)
опубликовать статью

Volume 8, Number 2 (April-June 2018)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36544032

Abstract:
Purpose: based on current research, the development of the institution of corporate citizenship has been studied in order to stimulate the economic growth of large industrial structures. Materials and methods: the methodological basis of this article is research on the development of the institution of corporate citizenship, as well as the role of corporate citizenship in stimulating the economic growth of large industrial structures. In this article, applied methods such as analysis and synthesis, systematization and comparison. Results: this article defines the role and importance of corporate citizenship, and also identifies the factor of influence of corporate citizenship on the economic growth of large industrial structures. Conclusions: corporate citizenship is not only an initiative of companies. This is the interaction between business, government, employees and the public. Without mutual support, this process will not advance beyond small charitable initiatives. The findings and research results can be used in the implementation of the concept of corporate citizenship for the most fruitful management of balanced economic growth of large industrial structures.

Keywords: management, stimulation, economic growth, large industrial structures, transnational companies, Institute of corporate citizenship

References:

1. Kuznetsov A.V. Transnational corporations in the world [Electronic resource]. World and National Economy. 2014; 2(29).
2. Peregudov S.P., Semenenko I.S. Corporate citizenship as a new form of business, society and government relations. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2008.
3. Strezhneva M.V., Prokhorenko I.L. Economic Management in the European Union: Institutional and Political Aspects. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2013.
4. Schlichter A.A. Ideological foundations and practices of socially-oriented activities of corporations and charitable foundations in the West and in Russia. Society and Economics. 2017; (12):76–90.
5. Tsvetkov V.A. Five problems of economic security and economic growth in modern Russia. Bulletin of Financial University. 2016; (2):6–15.
6. Ho F.N., Wang H. M.D., Vitell S.J. A global analysis of corporate social performance: The effects of cultural and geographic environments. Journal of business ethics. 2012; 107(4):423–433.
7. Jamali D., Karam C. Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2018; 20(1):32–61.
8. Lim A., Tsutsui K. Globalization and commitment in corporate social responsibility: Cross-national analyses of institutional and politicaleconomy effects. American Sociological Review. 2012; 77(1):69–98.
9. Perlmutter H. V. The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. International Business. Routledge, 2017: 117–126.

Страница обновлена: 21.03.2025 в 04:05:25

Подробнее об авторах: