The development of foreign trade cooperation of the EAEU member States, the EU and China
Vartanova M.L.1,2, Drobot E.V.3
1 Центр исследования процессов евразийской интеграции
2 Институт социально-политических исследований РАН
3 Выборгский филиал Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации
Download PDF | Downloads: 40 | Citations: 5
Journal paper
Food Policy and Security (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Volume 5, Number 2 (April-June 2018)
Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37299549
Cited: 5 by 31.10.2020
Abstract:
For several years, relations between Russia and the collective West have been in crisis. The political crisis stands in the way of systemic solutions for economic cooperation between the two unions – European and Eurasian. For the Eurasian Union, deep economic integration with the EU is extremely important. First, the EU is the largest trading partner of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan: it accounts for 50 3 % of total exports and 40 8 % of total imports of the EAEU countries. It should be noted that according to the results of 2016, the EAEU imported from APEC countries by 1 5 % more goods (42, 3 %, due to the growth of supplies from China, South Korea and ASEAN countries) than from the EU. Secondly, Europe could be an important source of capital. Thirdly, the EU could play an important role in solving the problems of modernization of the EAEU countries and serve as a source of technological renewal.
Keywords: innovation, china, competitiveness, infrastructure, integration, production, modernization, agriculture, monitoring, digital economy, integration processes, the european union, food security, economic cooperation, foreign trade cooperation, the Eurasian economic Union (hereinafter – the EAEU), trade partners
References:
Drobot E.V., Batarin I.V., Pekki V.D. (2017). Analiz usloviy vneshney torgovli Rossii i stran Zapada v usloviyakh sanktsionnyh voyn [Analysis of conditions of Russia''s and western countries'' foreign trade under the conditions of sanctions wars]. Journal of International Economic Affairs. 7 (1). 27-40. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/eo.7.1.37392 .
Drobot E.V., Makarov I.N., Ivanova A.A. (2017). Osobennosti gosudarstvennogo upravleniya razvitiem strategicheskikh otrasley v usloviyakh ekonomicheskikh sanktsiy: institutsionalnyy i sistemnyy aspekt [Features of state management of the development of strategic industries under economic sanctions: institutional and systemic aspect]. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 18 (19). 2769-2786. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/rp.18.19.38358 .
Dudin M.N., Lyasnikov N.V. (2017). Prodovolstvennaya bezopasnost i torgovo-sbytovaya politika v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Food security and trade-marketing policy in conditions of globalization]. Food policy and security. 4 (1). (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/ppib.4.1.38317.
Medyakova E.M. (2016). Protektsionizm politiki publichnyh zakupok dlya malogo i srednego biznesa v protsesse reversii mirovyh ekonomicheskikh otnosheniy [Protectionism of the policy of public procurement for small and medium-sized businesses in the process of reversion of world economic relations]. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 6 (4). 461-471. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/epp.6.4.36873.
Polyukhovich A.V. (2016). Organizatsiya truda v usloviyakh globalizatsii khozyaystvennyh protsessov [The organization of labor in the conditions of globalization of economic processes]. Ekonomika i sotsium: sovremennye modeli razvitiya. 6 (1). 61-72. (in Russian).
Repin D.V., Samik M.V. (2017). Tamozhenno-tarifnoe regulirovanie vneshnetorgovoy deyatelnosti kak instrument obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti [Customs and tariff regulation of foreign trade activity as a tool for ensuring economic security]. Shadow Economy. 1 (3). 127-138. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/tek.1.3.38425.
Vartanova M.L. (2017). Agropromyshlennyy kompleks: problemy sotsialno-ekonomicheskoy modernizatsii [The agro-industrial complex: problems of socio-economic modernization]. Social policy and sociology. 16 (3(122)). 20-28. (in Russian). doi: 10.17922/2071-3665-2017-16-3-20-28 .
Vartanova M.L. (2017). Neobkhodimost aktivizatsii investitsionno-innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti promyshlennyh predpriyatiy na otechestvennom i mezhdunarodnom rynke [Need to promote investment and innovation activities of industrial enterprises in domestic and international market]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 7 (2). 141-150. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/vinec.7.2.38112 .
Vartanova M.L., Drobot E.V. (2018). Perspektivy tsifrovizatsii selskogo khozyaystva kak prioritetnogo napravleniya importozamescheniya [Prospects for digitalization of agriculture as a priority direction of import substitution]. Journal of International Economic Affairs. 8 (1). 1-18. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/eo.8.1.38881 .
Vartanova M.L., Drobot E.V. (2018). Vliyanie neprostyh protivorechivyh protsessov na rost otechestvennogo selskogo khozyaystva [Impact of difficult contradictory processes on the growth of domestic agriculture]. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 19 (1). 13-36. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/rp.19.1.38718.
Страница обновлена: 25.05.2025 в 04:11:34