Relationship between management policy and corporate culture

Lazviashvili L.1
1 Учебный университет Геомеди

 Download PDF | Downloads: 33 | Citations: 1

Journal paper

Leadership and Management (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 5, Number 2 (April-June 2018)

Citation:

Lazviashvili, L. (2018). Relationship between management policy and corporate culture. Leadership and Management, 5(2), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.18334/lim.5.2.40089

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37083732
Cited: 1 by 31.03.2023

Abstract:
Market-oriented management implies respect for consumer and corporate values. The main goal of the management algorithm is adaptation to the market environment and launching an impressive mechanism, taking into account the optimization of processes. The article emphasizes the principles of modern management and the realistic orientation of integrated management. Management policy should be directed to practical realization of strategic directions and social-political aspects in the relevant liability zone. American and German value descriptors are set out – cultural-psychological and managerial paradigm in relevant companies. Thus, democratization of management ensures social motivation that is reflected in the development of rationalism. As a conclusion, it should be noted that cultural and worldview liberalism is largely responsible for the quality of management.

Keywords: responsibility Zone. Management algorithm. Democratization of management. Security culture. Socialization. Management philosophy. Integrated management

Похожие статьи:

   The relationship between corporate culture, quality of work life and employee turnover in an organization (Хуан Инь) Russian Journal of Labour Economics. Num. 12 / 2023

   Testing the influence of corporate culture and corporate management on market capitalization of international firms in Russia (Зимрутян Г.А.) Num. 3 / 2016

References:

Albert A. (2012). Osnovy menedzhmenta [Fundamentals of management] Vilyams. (in Russian).
Armstrong M. (2004). Praktika upravleniya chelovecheskimi resursami [The practice of human resource management] Vysshaya shkola. (in Russian).
Davis S. (1984). Managing corporate culture Cambridge.
Deal T. (1982). Corporate cultures Addison-Wesley.
Denison D. (1990). Theory of management Wiley.
Druker P. (2010). Praktika menedzhmenta [Management practice] Vilyams. (in Russian).
Guest D. (1994). Personnel management British Journal.
Lamben Zh. (2007). Menedzhment, orientirovannyy na rynok [Market-oriented management] SPb.: Piter. (in Russian).
Maslow A. (1954). Motivation and personality H@R.
Meskon M. (2012). Menedzhment [Management] Vilyams. (in Russian).
Patsula P. (2010). Biznes-planirovanie [Business planning] M-INFO. (in Russian).
Robinson R. (2013). Strategicheskiy menedzhment [Strategic management] SPb.: Piter. (in Russian).
Schein E. (2004). Organizational culture Jossey-Bass.

Смотрите также:

   Corporate entrepreneurship as a strategic resource for innovative development of a company (Устинова О.Е.) Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. Num. 2 / 2020

  Relationship between corporate culture and the activities of the company (Григорьева Ю.А.) Leadership and Management. Num. 4 / 2023

   The link between corporate social responsibility and sustainable development (Ромашова К.А.) Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility. Num. 1 / 2024

   The relationship between global trends and rural development policies (based on international experience) (Воронцова Н.В.) Journal of International Economic Affairs. Num. 1 / 2021

   Corporate culture values as an HR management tool (Калошина Т.Ю., Бельская Ю.В.) Leadership and Management. Num. 1 / 2023

Страница обновлена: 03.05.2025 в 02:59:57