Analysis of the linkage between the state tariff policy and the innovative development indicators

Ivanova M.V.¹, Garmasar O.A.²
¹ Санкт-Петербургский политехнический университет Петра Великого, Russia
² Санкт-Петербургский государственный экономический университет, Russia

Download PDF | Downloads: 23

Journal paper

Creative Economy ^{(РИНЦ, ВАК)}
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 13, Number 3 (March 2019)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37242404

Abstract:
The paper explores the theoretical framework of the interrelations between tariff policy and the innovative development and provides assessing of this relationship. The authors analyze the definition of the high-quality government regulation, review the theoretical considerations of its role in changing the level of innovative activity. The paper also considers the potential effects of the tariff policy on the innovative development. By applying regressive and correlation analysis tools, the authors assess the character of the interrelationships between simple mean tariff and an innovative development indicator, particularly, innovative firms as a percentage of total firms in several countries. The study concluded that there is no statistically significant relationship between reviewed indicators. At the same time, significant correlation is revealed between changing the simple mean tariff (in particular, its rising) and changing the innovative firms percentage.

Keywords: government regulation, innovative development, analysis, tariff policy

JEL-classification: H83; O38; O3; P43

Highlights:

1. Два ключевых следствия внедрения нормы: негативное – возникновение нагрузки подчинения, и позитивное, стимулирующее инновации.
2. Таможенный тариф – это свод ставок таможенных пошлин, применяемых к товарам, ввозимым на таможенную территорию государства.
3. Гипотеза: существует корреляция между величиной простого среднего тарифа и показателями инновационного развития экономики.
4. Вывод исследования: отсутствует значимая связь показателей простого среднего тарифа и доли инновационных фирм в экономике (в моменте).
5. Выявлена заметная отрицательная связь роста простого среднего тарифа и доли инновационных фирм.

References:

Akcigit U., Ates S.T., Impullitti G. (2018). Innovation and Trade Policy in a Globalized World International Finance. (1230). 1-80. doi: 10.17016/IFDP.2018.1230.
Ames E., Rosenberg N. (1963). Changing Technological Leadership and Industrial Growth Eсonomiс Journal. (73). 13-31.
Blind K. (2012). The Impaсt of Regulation on Innovation Nesta Working Paper. (12/02). 1-40.
Boehringer Ch., Cuntz A.N., Harhoff D., Asane-Otoo E. The Impacts of Feed-In Tariffs on Innovation: Empirical Evidence from GermanyCESifo Working Paper Series. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2419859
Carlin W., Soskice D. (2006). Maсroeconomics: Imperfections, Institutions & Policies Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fagerberg J., Srholes M., Verspagen B. (2009). Innovation and Eсonomiс Development MERIT Working Papers, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology. (032). 3-74.
Gorbacheva M.V. (2013). Analiz tendentsiy razvitiya mezhdunarodnoy torgovli [Trends of international trade]. International Research Journal. (10-3(17)). 28-29. (in Russian).
Granieri M., Renda A. (2012). Innovation Law and Poliсy in the European Union Milan: Springer.
OECD. Innovation statistics and indicatorOECD Publishing. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/inno-stats.htm#definitions
OECD. Regulatory compliance costs assessment guidanceOECD Publishing. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264209657-en
Pelkmans J., Renda A. Does EU regulation hinder or stimulate innovation? CEPS Special ReportCentre for European Policy Studies. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/No%2096%20EU%20Legislation%20and%20Innovation.pdf
Porter M. (1993). Mezhdunarodnaya konkurentsiya [International competition] M.: Izd-vo «Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya». (in Russian).
Porter M. (1991). America’s Green Strategy Scientific American. (264(1)). 168.
Porter M., C. van der Linde (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship Journal of Economic Perspective. (9(4)). 97-118.
Rubini L. Innovation and the elasticity of trade volumes to tariff reductionsEFIGE working рaper. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads /2015/09/ efige_wp31_ 3005111.pdf
Schumpeter J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy New York: Harper.
Sorokin M.A. (2012). Tamozhennoe regulirovanie v teoriyakh konkurentsii. Istoriko-metodologicheskiy eskiz [Customs regulations in the theories of competition. Historical and methodological sketch]. Territory of New Opportunities: Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service Bulletin. (5(18)). 171-178. (in Russian).
Stewart L.A. (2010). The impact of regulation on innovation in the United States: A cross-industry literature review Information technology & innovation foundation. 1-29.
Tarra D.G. (2006). Torgovaya politika i zadachi vstupleniya v VTO dlya Rossii i stran SNG [Trade policy and challenges of WTO accession for Russia and CIS countries] M: Izd-vo «Ves mir». (in Russian).
Портал данных Всемирного Банка. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/tm.tax.mrch.sm.ar.zs

Страница обновлена: 01.05.2025 в 20:22:46

Подробнее об авторах: