The theoretical study of the conceptual content of two fundamental approaches to the interpretation of the dynamics of territorial economic inequality

Fenin K.V.1
1 Саратовский национальный исследовательский государственный университет им. Н.Г. Чернышевского, Russia

Journal paper

Journal of International Economic Affairs (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 9, Number 1 (January-March 2019)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38228727
Cited: 8 by 31.03.2023

Abstract:
This article contains an analysis of main economic theories and models that form the basis of two approaches to the problem of describing, explaining and predicting the dynamics of territorial (global, intercountry, national and local) economic inequality. The study of the first approach (the «flat world» approach), based on the classical and neoclassical theories of the international division of labor and world trade, the Marx’s theory, the Chelintsev’s concept of the development of agricultural areas, models of innovation diffusion of T. Hägerstrand and H. Giesch, made it possible to reduce its main content to the thesis of a gradual convergence, i.e. the movement from an economically heterogeneous to a uniformly developed world. The study of the second approach (the «voluminous world» approach), combining the concept of Serra, the theory of von Thünen, the theory Weber, Myrdal’s scientific views, Krugman’s aggregated formal mathematical model, to reduce its main content to the idea of the periodical reproduction of territorial and economic inequalities between states and their regions. Preservation over long historical intervals and periodic growth of the scale of territorial economic inequality indicate that the theories of the «flat world» approach are more relevant.

Keywords: dynamics, territorial economic inequality, «flat world» approach, «voluminous world» approach

JEL-classification: D63, R13, F69

References:

(2014). Kembridzhskaya ekonomicheskaya istoriya Evropy Novogo i Noveyshego vremeni [The Cambridge economic history of Europe of New and Newest time] M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gaydara. (in Russian).
Arrigi Dzh. (2009). Adam Smit v Pekine: chto poluchil v nasledstvo XXI vek [Adam Smith in Beijing: what inherited XXI century] M.: Institut obschestvennogo proektirovaniya. (in Russian).
Brodel F. (1986). Materialnaya tsivilizatsiya, ekonomika i kapitalizm, XV–XVIII vv [Material civilization, economy and capitalism, XV-XVIII centuries] M.: Progress. (in Russian).
Brodel F. (1992). Materialnaya tsivilizatsiya, ekonomika i kapitalizm, XV–XVIII vv [Material civilization, economy and capitalism, XV-XVIII centuries] M.: Progress. (in Russian).
Chelintsev A.N. (1928). Russkoe selskoe khozyaystvo pered Revolyutsiey [Russian agriculture before Revolution] M.: Kooperativnoe izdatelstvo studentov Selsko-khozyaystvennoy akademii im. Timiryazeva «Novyy agronom. (in Russian).
Fenin K.V. (2018). Teorii rasprostraneniya innovatsiy i problema neravnomernogo sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [The theories of distribution of innovations and problem of uneven social and economic development] Dylnov readings. 263-265. (in Russian).
Fenin K.V. (2017). Interpretatsiya klassicheskikh teoriy territorialno-otraslevogo razdeleniya truda i mezhdunarodnoy torgovli [Interpretation of classical theories of territorially-branch division of labor and international trade]. Izvestiya saratovskogo universiteta. novaya seriya. seriya: ekonomika. upravlenie. pravo. 17 (2). 148-156. (in Russian). doi: 10.18500/1994-2540-2017-17-2-148-156.
Friedman T. (2005). The World is Flat. A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century New York: Farrar, Status and Giroux.
Gadzhiev Yu.A. (2008). Neoklassicheskie i kumulyativnye teorii regionalnogo ekonomicheskogo rosta [Neoclassical and cumulative theories of regional economic growth]. Korporativnoe upravlenie i innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki severa: vestnik nauchno-issledovatelskogo tsentra korporativnogo prava, upravleniya i venchurnogo investirovaniya syktyvkarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. (1). 6-23. (in Russian).
Gadzhiev Yu.A. (2009). Zarubezhnye teorii regionalnogo ekonomicheskogo rosta i razvitiya [The foreign theories of the regional economic growth and development]. Economy of the region. (2). 45-62. (in Russian).
Gershenkron A. (2015). Ekonomicheskaya otstalost v istoricheskoy perspektive [Economic backwardness in historical perspective] M.: Izdatelskiy dom «Delo» RANKhiGS. (in Russian).
Giersch H. (1979). Aspects of Growth, Structural Change, and Employment: A Schumpeterian Perspective Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. (115). 629-652.
Goldenberg E. (1925). Teoriya promyshlennogo rayonirovaniya Alfreda Vebera [The theory of industrial zoning by Alfred Weber]. Planovoe khozyaystvo. (3). 223-233. (in Russian).
Hägerstrand T. (1966). Aspects of the Spatial Structure of Social Communication and the Diffusion of Information Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association. (16). 27-42.
Khaylbroner R.L. (2016). Filosofy ot mira sego [The philosophers of this world] M.: Izdatelstvo AST: CORPUS. (in Russian).
Kheksher E.F. (2006). Vliyanie vneshney torgovli na raspredelenie dokhoda [The impact of foreign trade on income distribution] M.: TEIS. (in Russian).
Kondratev N.D. (2017). Krizisy i prognozy v svete teorii dlinnyh voln. Vzglyad iz sovremennosti [Crises and forecasts in the light of the theory of long waves. The look of modernity] M.: Mosk. red. izd.-va «Uchitel». (in Russian).
Krugman P. (2006). Vozrastayuschaya otdacha, monopolisticheskaya konkurentsiya i mezhdunarodnaya torgovlya [Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and international trade] M.: TEIS. (in Russian).
Krugman P. (1999). The role of geography in development International Regional Science Review. (22(2)). 142-161.
Krugman P. (2005). Prostranstvo: posledniy rubezh [Space: the final frontier]. Spatial Economics. 121-136. (in Russian).
Marks K. (2001). Kapital [Capital] M.: OOO «Izdatelstvo AST». (in Russian).
Marks K., Engels F. (1974). Manifest kommunisticheskoy partii [The Communist Manifesto] M.: Politizdat. (in Russian).
Myurdal G. (1972). Sovremennye problemy «tretego mira» [Modern problems of “third world”] M.: Progress. (in Russian).
Olin B. (2006). Mezhregionalnaya i mezhdunarodnaya torgovlya [Interregional and international trade] M.: TEIS. (in Russian).
Pilyasov A.N. (2011). Novaya ekonomicheskaya geografiya (NEG) i eyo potentsial dlya izucheniya razmescheniya proizvoditelnyh sil Rossii [New economic geography (NEG) and its potential for studying of productive forces of Russia]. Regional research. (1(31)). 3-31. (in Russian).
Raynert. E. (2011). Kak bogatye strany stali bogatymi, i pochemu bednye strany ostayutsya bednymi [How rich countries got rich ... and why poor countries stay poor] M.: Izd. Dom. Gos. un-ta – Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. (in Russian).
Rikardo D. (1955). Nachala politicheskoy ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya [Principles of political economy and taxation] M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury. (in Russian).
Rodionova I.A. (2002). Promyshlennost mira: territorialnye sdvigi vo vtoroy polovine XX v [Industry of the world: territorial shifts in the second half of the XX century] M.: Moskovskiy Litsey. (in Russian).
Serra A. (1953). Kratkiy traktat o sredstvakh snabdit v izobilii zolotom i serebrom korolevstva, lishyonnye rudnikov dragotsennyh metallov [A brief treatise on the means to provide plentiful gold and silver of the kingdom, deprived of the mines of precious metals] L.: OGIZ, SOTsEKGIZ, Leningradskoe otdelenie. (in Russian).
Smit A. (1962). Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of Nations] M.: Izdatelstvo sotsialno-ekonomicheskoy literatury. (in Russian).
Tyunen I.-G. (1926). Izolirovannoe gosudarstvo [Isolated state] M.: Izdatelstvo «Ekonomicheskaya zhizn». (in Russian).

Страница обновлена: 17.01.2025 в 16:02:54