The results of the investment development of the regions in the territories which operate technical-innovation special economic zone,

Moroshkina M.V.^1,2, Myaki S.A.³
¹ Федеральный исследовательский центр Карельский научный центр РАН - Институт экономики
² Петрозаводский государственный университет - Институт экономики и права
³ Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте РФ

Download PDF | Downloads: 12

Journal paper

Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship *
Volume 20, Number 1 (January 2019)
* Этот журнал не выпускается в Первом экономическом издательстве

Citation:

Abstract:
The article examines some aspects of development of the Russian regions, which are formed and operate special economic zones. Special attention is paid to technical innovation zones.
The position of inefficiency in the functioning of special economic zones leads to the closure of some of them. This study reveals promising directions for the development of SEZ territories.
Theoretical and methodological foundations of the study are based on works of domestic and foreign scientists on the problems of regional development. Analytical material for the study includes the scientific literature on mathematical Economics, econometrics and statistics, as well as the employed methods and approaches for the analysis of statistical data.
Information base of research includes the data of the federal service of state statistics and statistical data published in national and international journals and presented on Internet sites.
A retrospective review of establishing special economic zones in Russia from the perspective of statistical data analysis and consideration of regulatory and legal acts. We analyzed the results of investment development of SEZs in various areas of specialization over the period 2005-2015, and to identify promising directions.
Analysis of the level of investment development based on the specialization of SEZ will allow representatives of the business environment, focused on expansion of its activities, determine the most investment-attractive conditions of conducting economic activity.
The presence of real SEZ residents and the positive trend of investment development of the regions confirms the generally positive impact of the new business activity regime on the inflow of investments.

Keywords: special economic zone, regional economy, regions, investment development, perspective development trends, preferential tax regime for entrepreneurial activity

JEL-classification: O31, O33, O24, O43

Highlights:

Статья посвящена исследованию инвестиционной активности регионов, отдельно внимание уделяется территориям, в которых действует особый налоговый режим для ведения производственной и предпринимательской деятельности – ОЭЗ. По результатам анализа динамики развития регионов, в различные периоды времени, авторы приходят к выводу, о том, что специализация территории оказывает существенное влияние на динамику развития территории. Одним из важных факторов регионального развития является инвестиционная активность территории, которая обеспечивает стабильный рост большинства направлений хозяйственной деятельности территорий. В результате проведенной в исследовании классификации российских регионов по уровню инвестиционной активности, определены территории, которые имеют высокую инвестиционную активность. Высокие показатели инвестиций в основной капитал имеют также территории, в которых созданы ОЭЗ, что позволяет судить эффективности проводимой экономической политики.

References:

Agafonova O.A. (2011). Otsenka effektivnosti nalogovyh preferentsiy, predostavlyaemaya rezidentam osobyh ekonomicheskikh zon [Estimation of Efficiency of Tax Preferences Given to Residents of Special Economic Zones]. Bulletin of the Pacific State University. (1(20)). 191-200. (in Russian).
Bakanov M.I., Sheremet A.D. (2001). Teoriya ekonomicheskogo analiza [Theory of economic analysis] M.: Finansy i statistika. (in Russian).
Hagerstrand T. (1967). Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process Chicago: The Univer. of Chicago Press.
Khemilton A. (2000). Innovatsionnaya i korporativnaya restrukturizatsiya v mirovoy ekonomike [Innovative and corporative restructuring in the world economy]. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Management. (6). 37. (in Russian).
Kuznetsova O.V. (2016). Osobye ekonomicheskie zony: effektivny ili net? [Special economic zones: effective or not?]. Spatial Economics. (4). 129-152. (in Russian).
Novitskiy N.A. (2011). Kontseptualnye osnovy vzaimodeystviya investitsionno-strukturnoy i innovatsionnoy politiki [Conceptual framework of investment-structural and innovation policy interaction] M.: Institut ekonomiki RAN. (in Russian).
Nureev R.M. (2005). Shumpeter Y.A.: rol skholastiki v istorii ekonomicheskogo analiza [J.a. shumpeter: the role of scholastics in history of economic analysis]. The Economic vestnik. 3 (4). 20-27. (in Russian).
Pavlov P.V. (2013). Osobye ekonomicheskie zony kak mekhanizm effektivnogo razvitiya mezhdunarodnoy investitsionnoy i innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti [Special economic zones as a mechanism for effective development of international investment and innovation]. Mirovaya politika. (1). 51-144. (in Russian). doi: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.1.638.
Rodionov I. (2005). Stanut li osobye ekonomicheskie zony tsentrom prityazheniya investitsiy i lokomotivami ekonomicheskogo rosta? [Will special economic zones become the center of attraction of investments and engines of economic growth?]. Expert. (36). 42. (in Russian).
Sevek V.K., Badarchi Kh.B., Sevek R.M., Manchyk-Sat Ch.S., Chuldum A.E. (2016). Issledovanie stsenariya razvitiya Respubliki Tyva v sisteme territorii operezhayuschego razvitiya [Scenario research of the Tuva Republic development in the system of priority development territories]. Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. (6). 43-58. (in Russian).
Shumpeter Y. (1982). Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Theory of economic development] M.: Progress. (in Russian).
Tatarkin A.I. (2012). Problemy ekonomicheskoy i politicheskoy tselostnosti postsovetskogo prostranstva [Problems of economic and political integrity of the post-Soviet space] Regional problems of economic transformation. 16-23. (in Russian).
Vazhenin S.G., Bersenev V.L., Vazhenina I.S., Tatarkin A.I. (2011). Territorialnaya konkurentsiya v ekonomicheskom prostranstve [Territorial competition in the economic space] Yekaterinburg: izd. IE UrO RAN. (in Russian).
Морошкина М.В. Социально-экономические показатели развития регионов РФ за период 1991-2015 ггПрограммы для ЭВМ. Базы данных. Базы данных, охраняемые авторскими правами. (in Russian). Retrieved from http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1270707126016
Никода К. Инвестиционная активность в портовой отрасли России. Морские портыГазпромбанк. (in Russian). Retrieved May 12, 2018, from http://www.morvesti.ru/analitics/detail.php?ID=61791

Страница обновлена: 20.03.2025 в 06:33:11

Подробнее об авторах: