Comparative analysis of the financial expenditure of the countries of the world and Russia on R&D
Egorov N.E.1
1 НИИ региональной экономики Севера Северо-Восточного федерального университета им. М.К. Аммосова
Download PDF | Downloads: 27 | Citations: 4
Journal paper
Russian Journal of Innovation Economics (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Volume 9, Number 4 (October-December 2019)
Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42555564
Cited: 4 by 24.01.2023
Abstract:
Development of innovative economy of any country depends on mechanisms and forms of financing of scientific researches and applied developments. The analysis is based on the TOP 10 countries according to the rating conducted by Bloomberg to identify the most developed innovative economies in the world for 2017. As statistical indicators, internal expenditure on R&D, as well as civil allocations for science from the state budget of the country are used. The article presents the results of a comparative assessment of the financial costs of the leading countries of the world and Russia on R&D. The analysis of the ratio of the share of the contribution of the state and business to the financing of science shows the dominant position in the allocation of funds of the business sector in most foreign countries. In Russia, internal expenditure on R&D are 93.0 thousand dollars per researcher a year. According to this indicator, Russia occupies the 47th position among other countries of the world, for this reason the increase in the value of this indicator is the most important task of the science financing system in the country. In general, according to the rating of financial expenditures on R&D, South Korea, the United States and Germany are among the top three with relatively high rates.
Keywords: innovative economies, R&D, science budget
JEL-classification: O32, O33, O57
References:
Glisin F.F., Kalyuzhnyy V.V., Lebedev K.V. (2013). Analiz ispolzovaniya instrumentov finansirovaniya nauchnoy i innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti [Analysis of Financing Instruments Using for Scientific and Innovative Activity]. Innovations. (9). 43-49. (in Russian).
Gokhberg L.M., Ditkovskiy K.A., Dyachenko E.L. (2019). Indikatory nauki: 2019 [Science indicators: 2019] M.: NIU VShE. (in Russian).
Gorodnikova N.V., Gokhberg L.M., Ditkovskiy K.A. i dr. (2019). Nauka. Tekhnologii. Innovatsii: 2019 [Science. Technology. Innovation: 2019] M.: NIU VShE. (in Russian).
Lebedev K.V., Glisin F.F., Kalyuzhnyy V.V. (2014). Sravnitelnaya otsenka effektivnosti finansirovaniya nauki iz regionalnyh byudzhetov [Comparative evaluation of efficiency of science financing from the regional budgets]. Innovatika i ekspertiza: nauchnye trudy. (1(12)). 197-209. (in Russian).
Matkovskaya Ya.S. (2014). Pochemu Rossiya ne innovatsionnaya strana? (innovatsionnyy potentsial Rossii: tendentsii i perspektivy) [Why Russia is not an innovation country? (innovation potential of Russia: trends and prospects)]. National interests: priorities and security. (10(247)). 25-37. (in Russian).
Yearbook of Statistics SingaporeSingstat.gov.sg. Retrieved July 25, 2019, from https://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/reference/yearbook-of-statistics-singapore
Ассигнования на гражданскую науку из средств федерального бюджета в Российской ФедерацииIssek.hse.ru. (in Russian). Retrieved July 25, 2019, from https://issek.hse.ru/news/284029326.html
Методы нормированияStudopedia.ru. Retrieved July 25, 2019, from https://studopedia.ru/5_127883_metodi-normirovaniya.html
Рейтинг ведущих стран мира по затратам на наукуIssek.hse.ru. (in Russian). Retrieved July 25, 2019, from https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/221869863
Страница обновлена: 29.04.2025 в 08:14:56