Strategic aspects of China's energy transition

Salygin V.I.¹, Novikov I.A.², Mustafinov R.K.³
¹ Международный институт энергетической политики и дипломатии МГИМО МИД России
² МИД России
³ Международный институт энергетической политики и дипломатии МГИМО МИД России (Попечительский Совет)

Download PDF | Downloads: 26 | Citations: 1

Journal paper

Journal of International Economic Affairs ^{(РИНЦ, ВАК)}
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 9, Number 3 (July-September 2019)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41243638
Cited: 1 by 24.01.2023

Abstract:
High rates of exploitation of the domestic resource base and the significant role of the oil and gas sector in the formation of the budget revenues necessitate a detailed analysis of the risks of changes in the situation of the largest energy markets. The demands of the global economy are being transformed due to the expansion of opportunities for the development of alternative deposits, the development of transport and energy infrastructure, the improvement of renewable energy technologies and the digitalization of energy. According to the authors' vision and medium-term forecasts of international agencies, oil and gas markets will remain politicized. The predominance of traditional power stations remains a basic aspect of the energy security of the major powers. Demand primarily depends on the strategic development of the largest consumers and the existence of rational alternative opportunities.

Keywords: china, export, hydrocarbons, innovation paradigm, energy sector

JEL-classification: F13, Q35, N55

References:

Aertrycke G., Ehrenmann A., Smeers Y. (2017). Investment with incomplete markets for risk: The need for long-term contracts Energy Policy. (105). 571-583.
Antweiler W. (2016). Cross-border trade in electricity Journal of International Economics. (101). 42-51.
Brown D., Eckert A., Eckert H. (2017). Electricity markets in transition: Market distortions associated with retail price controls Electricity Journal. (30). 32-37.
Dagoumas A., Koltsaklis N., Panapakidis I. (2017). An integrated model for risk management in electricity trade Energy. (124). 350-363.
Hawker G., Bell K., Gill S. (2017). Electricity security in the European Union—The conflict between national Capacity Mechanisms and the Single Market Energy Research and Social Science. (24). 51-58.
Hogan W.W. (2018). Primer on Transmission Benefits and Cost Allocation Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy. (1). 25-45.
Hu J., Harmsen R., Crijns-Graus W., Worrell E., Broek M. (2018). Identifying barriers to large-scale integration of variable renewable electricity into the electricity market: A literature review of market design Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2 (81). 2181-2195.
Keppler J. (2017). Rationales for capacity remuneration mechanisms: Security of supply externalities and asymmetric investment incentives Energy Policy. (105). 562-570.
Kyritsis E., Andersson J., Serletis A. (2017). Electricity prices, large-scale renewable integration, and policy implications Energy Policy. (101). 550-560.
Marchenko O.V., Podkovalnikov S.V., Savelev V.A., Solomin S.V., Chudinova L.Yu. (2018). Rossiya v evraziyskoy elektroenergeticheskoy integratsii [RUSSIA IN EURASIAN ELECTRIC POWER INTEGRATION (World Economy and International Relations]. World Economy and International Relations. 62 (6). 18-29. (in Russian). doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-6-18-29 .
Menezes L., Houllier M. (2016). Reassessing the integration of European electricity markets: A fractional cointegration analysis Energy Economics. (53). 132-150.
Moran D., Russell J. (2016). Maritime Strategy and Global Order: Markets, Resources, Security Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Mustafinov R.K. (2017). Nekotorye vneshneekonomicheskie osobennosti razvitiya elektroenergeticheskogo kompleksa Rossii [Some aspects of the Russian power industry development: external economic features]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 7 (4). 307-322. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/vinec.7.4.38352 .
Olmos L., Rivier M., Pérez-Arriaga I. (2018). Transmission expansion benefits: The key to redesigning the regulation of electricity transmission in a regional context Energy and Environment. (1). 47-62.
Ringler P., Keles D., Fichtner W. (2017). How to benefit from a common European electricity market design Energy Policy. (101). 629-643.
Salygin V.I., Guliev I.A., Mustafinov R.K. (2018). Transformatsiya investitsionnyh politik stran OESR v oblasti innovatsiy: elektroenergeticheskaya otrasl [Transformation of Investment Policies of OECD Countries in the Field of Innovations: Electric Power Industry]. Financial business. (3(194)). 54-61. (in Russian).
Shvets N.N., Filippova A.V. (2018). Metodicheskiy podkhod k otsenke effektivnosti obedineniya elektroenergeticheskikh rynkov stran Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza [Methodological approach to estimation of efficiency of union of electricity markets of countries of the Eurasian economic union]. Audit and financial analysis. (1). 421-437. (in Russian).
Zipp A. (2017). The marketability of variable renewable energy in liberalized electricity markets – An empirical analysis Renewable Energy. (113). 1111-1121.

Страница обновлена: 26.04.2025 в 05:52:56

Подробнее об авторах: