Strategies of labour productivity increase and added value creation

Simonova M.V.¹
¹ Самарский государственный экономический университет, Russia

Download PDF | Downloads: 29 | Citations: 12

Journal paper

Russian Journal of Labour Economics ^{(РИНЦ, ВАК)}
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 6, Number 3 (July-September 2019)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41243565
Cited: 12 by 07.12.2023

Abstract:
The model of creating added value of a product was developed, which revealed the tendencies in changing the structure of creating added value of goods and services, caused by the widespread use of digital technologies, when the main share is increasingly accounted for at the stage of creating a product with new qualities. The distinction between the use of the concepts of labour productivity and productivity of an economic system was substantiated. Productivity of an economic system has a broader interpretation and includes the entire complex of economic processes, such as labour productivity, marketing, managerial productivity and the creation of new products with high consumer qualities. It is determined that the highest added value is provided by the products created with the use of digital technologies. It justifies the priority of high technology stage and the shift of the center of gravity in creating added value to the stage where the idea is formed, technologies are being developed and created. Decomposition of the goals and objectives of labour productivity at the enterprise level was carried out and the areas of responsibility were identified at various management levels. There was developed the model that substantiates the aggregate growth in labour productivity and the level of investment in short, medium and long terms with the use of traditional and digital technologies.

Keywords: added value, labour productivity, innovations on the basis of digital technologies, productivity of an economic system, strategies of obtaining added value

JEL-classification: J24, D24, O33, E17

Highlights:

• Разработана модель создания добавленной стоимости продукта, в которой выявлены тенденции в изменении структуры создания добавленной стоимости товаров и услуг, когда основная доля стоимости все больше приходится на этап создания продукта с новыми качествами.
• Обосновано разграничение использования понятий «производительность труда» и «производительность экономической системы». Определено, что наиболее высокую добавленную стоимость можно получить в продуктах с использованием цифровых технологий.
• Разработаны приоритеты в управлении процессом создания добавленной стоимости, позволившие определить стратегии для повышения производительности труда. Для определения содержание понятия «производительность труда» проведена декомпозиция целей и задач производительности труда на уровне предприятия, выделены сферы ответственности на разных управленческих уровнях, что наглядно показывает логику выполнения задач как элемента управления.
• Разработана модель динамики темпов роста производительности труда и уровня инвестиций в краткосрочном, среднесрочном, долгосрочном периодах по традиционным и цифровым технологиям, обосновывающая применение разных инструментов в разные периоды в зависимости от периодов достижения поставленных целей.
• Сформулирована перспективная необходимость теоретического обоснования новой экономики труда в условиях роботизации и учетом воспроизводства роботов.

References:

Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. (2018). Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work NBER Chapters, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Barykin E.A. (2015). Idei ekonomii, polzy i proizvoditelnosti v trudakh dorevolyutsionnyh issledovateley publichnyh finansov i finansovogo prava [Saving ideas, benefits and performance in the works of pre-revolutionary researchers of public Finance and financial law]. Reforms and law. (1). 29-43. (in Russian).
Berdnikov V.A., Bazhutkina L.P., Simonova M.V. (2015). Аpproaches to the system salary increase in the region on the ground of labor production growth Review of European Studies. 7 (2). 58-65. doi: 10.5539/res.v7n2p58.
Chistnikova I.V., Antonova M.V. (2015). Teoreticheskie aspekty issledovaniya soderzhaniya i faktorov povysheniya proizvoditelnosti truda na predpriyatii [Theoretical aspects of research of the contents and factors of increase of labour productivity at the enterprise]. European science. (4). 18-20. (in Russian).
Ciccone A., Hall R. E. (1996). Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity American Economic Review. (86). 54-70.
Czumanski T., Lödding H. (2012). Integral analysis of labor productivity In Procedia CIRP. 55-60.
Datta D. K., Guthrie J. P., Wright P. M. (2005). Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal. (48). 135-145.
Duarte M., Restuccia D. T (2010). The role of the structural transformation in aggregate productivity Quarterly Journal of Economics. (125). 129-173.
Fedchenko A.A. (2016). Metodicheskie podkhody k issledovaniyu proizvoditelnosti truda [Methodological approaches to the study of productivity]. Russian Journal of Labor Economics. (3). 41-62. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/et.3.1.35153 .
Greyson Dzhekson K., O'Dell Karla (1991). Amerikanskiy menedzhment na poroge XXI veka [American management at the threshold of the XXI century] Moskva : Ekonomika. (in Russian).
Jarkas A. M., Bitar C. G. (2012). Factors Affecting Construction Labor Productivity in Kuwait Journal of Construction Engineering and Managemen. (138). 811-820.
Knyaginin V.N. (2017). Novaya tekhnologicheskaya revolyutsiya: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii [New technological revolution: challenges and opportunities for Russia] Moskva : Tsentr strategicheskikh razrabotok. (in Russian).
Mikheeva N.N (2015). Sravnitelnyy analiz proizvoditelnosti truda v rossiyskikh regionakh [Comparative analysis of labor productivity in Russian regions]. Regional Research of Russia. (2). 86-112. (in Russian). doi: 10.15372/REG20150605 .
Prescott Ellen R., McGrattan Edward C. (2012). The labor productivity puzzle
Rust R. T., Huang M.-H. (2012). Optimizing Service Productivity Journal of Marketing. (76). 47-66.
Selezneva T.O. (2015). Ekonomicheskaya suschnost i znachenie proizvoditelnosti truda [The economic essence and importance of productivity]. Nauchnaya diskussiya: voprosy ekonomiki i upravleniya. (5). 91-101. (in Russian).
Shash N.N., Borodin A.I. (2015). Pokazateli i sposoby izmereniya proizvoditelnosti truda i vozmozhnost ikh primeneniya na predpriyatiyakh [Indicators and ways of measuring productivity and their application in enterprises]. Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University. (1-3). 96-101. (in Russian).
Simonova M.V., Sankova L.V., Mirzabalaeva F.I. (2018). Еmployment in innovation production networks: regional sample CPMED 2018, International Scientific Conference "Global Challenges and Prospects of the Modern Economic Development". 1341-1348.
Syverson C. (2011). What Determines Productivity? Journal of Economic Literature. (49). 326-365. doi: 10.1257/jel.49.2.326.
Trading Economics [Электронный ресурс]: Current values, historical data, forecasts, statistics, graphs and economic calendar - Russia – ProductivityTradingeconomics.com. Retrieved April 16, 2019, from productivity
Vaisburd V.A., Simonova M.V., Bogatyreva I.V., Vanina E.G., Zheleznikova E.P. (2016). Рroductivity of labour and salaries in russia: problems and solutions International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 6 (55). 157-165.

Страница обновлена: 12.04.2025 в 04:43:33

Подробнее об авторе: