To the question of solving the problem of demarcation in the marketing management of the enterprise
Kalinichenko M.P.1
1 Донецкий национальный университет
Download PDF | Downloads: 17 | Citations: 2
Journal paper
Journal of International Economic Affairs (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Volume 9, Number 2 (April-June 2019)
Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39191669
Cited: 2 by 30.01.2024
Abstract:
In theory and practice, marketing management of the enterprise to date remains an open question about the relationship of scientific and non-scientific knowledge. The problem of demarcation is the definition and use of clear criteria or features that distinguish scientific (true) and unscientific (false) knowledge in any sphere of human spiritual activity, including in the field of market-oriented enterprise management.
In the study of management and marketing are considered as an applied economic science. The article proves that art, empiricism, theory and practice in the concept of marketing management are organically interrelated and determine each other in the integral structure of scientific knowledge. Empirical becomes theoretical, and what was theoretical at first becomes empirically available at a higher stage of development. The art of marketing enterprise management ensures the use of scientific knowledge in a particular practical situation, establishes and maintains the relationship between empirical theory and practice.
Keywords: marketing management, science, enterprise, demarcation problem
JEL-classification: M11, M31, M21
References:
Ananin O. (2007). Ekonomika: iskusstvo i/ili nauka [Economy: arts and/or science]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. (11). 4-24. (in Russian).
Avilov A.V. (2003). Refleksivnoe upravlenie. Metodologicheskie osnovaniya [Reflective management. Methodological foundations] M.: Tandem. (in Russian).
Bagiev G.L., Tarasevich V.M., Ann Kh. (2010). Marketing [Marketing] M. i dr.: Piter. (in Russian).
Blaug M. (2004). Metodologiya ekonomicheskoy nauki, ili kak ekonomisty obyasnyayut [The methodology of Economics, or how economists explain] M.: NP «Zhurn. Voprosy ekonomiki». (in Russian).
Budko V.V. (2007). Filosofiya nauki [Philosophy of science] Kharkov: Konsum. (in Russian).
Dauling G.R. (2006). Nauka i iskusstvo marketinga [The art and science of marketing] SPb.: Vektor. (in Russian).
Dryu Zh.-M. (2003). Lomaya steriotipy. Razryv: reklama, razrushayuschaya obscheprinyatoe [Breaking the stereotypes. The gap: advertising, Deplete common] SPb.: Piter. (in Russian).
Golembiovskiy S.A., Perov A.A. (2011). Konkretnyy marketing v epokhu bazarnoy ekonomiki [Specific marketing in the era of market economy] M.: Os-89. (in Russian).
Golubkov E.P. (2008). Teoriya i metodologiya marketinga: nastoyaschee i buduschee [Theory and methodology of marketing: present and future] M.: Delo i Servis. (in Russian).
Gorelov A.A. (2011). Kontseptsii sovremennogo estestvoznaniya [The concept of modern science] Moscow: Yurayt. (in Russian).
Gummesson E. (1994). Broadening and specifying relationship marketing Asia-Australia Marketing Journal. (2-1). 10-30.
Kalinichenko M.P. (2014). Multіatributivna konstruktsіya predmeta suchasnogo marketingu [Multi-attributive construction of the subject in contemporary marketing]. Vіsnik Kiїvskogo natsіonalnogo unіversitetu іm. T. Shevchenka. Serіya Ekonomіka. (7(160)). 42-48. (in Russian).
Kalinichenko M.P. (2018). Paradigmalnyy sintez v marketing-menedzhmente: ot manipulyatsii s potrebitelyami k garmonii interesov s zainteresovannymi storonami [Paradigmatic Synthesis In Marketing Management: from Manipulation with Consumers to Harmony of Interests with Involved Parties]. Bulletin of the Samara Municipal Management Institute. (1). 7-14. (in Russian).
Kanke V.A. (2009). Filosofiya ekonomicheskoy nauki [The philosophy of economic science] M.: INFRA-M. (in Russian).
Kharding G., Uolton P. (1992). Naydi svoy put v marketinge [Find your way in marketing] M.: AyKyu. (in Russian).
Kokhanovskiy V.P. (1999). Filosofiya i metodologiya nauki [The philosophy and methodology of science] Rostov-on-Don: Feniks. (in Russian).
Kotler F., Keller K.L. (2007). Marketing menedzhment [Marketing management] M. i dr.: Piter. (in Russian).
Kun T. (2009). Struktura nauchnyh revolyutsiy [The structure of scientific revolutions] M.: AST. (in Russian).
Kuznetsov E A. Tektologiya A.A. (2015). Bogdanova i sovremennaya aktualizatsiya menedzhmenta [Problems of tektology by A.A. Bogdanov and the modern management actualization]. Ekonomіka: realії chasu. (3(19)). 153-158. (in Russian).
Marks K., Engels F. (1955). Sochineniya [Works] M.: Gospolitizdat. (in Russian).
Nikiforov A.L. (2008). Filosofiya i istoriya nauki [Philosophy and history of science] M.: Ideya-Press. (in Russian).
Repev A.P. (2017). Marketingovoe myshlenie [Marketing thinking] M.: Biblos. (in Russian).
Shkurupiy A., Esina Yu. (2008). Osobennosti podgotovki marketologov v Ukraine [Features of training of marketing specialists in Ukraine]. Otdel marketinga. (6). 9-12. (in Russian).
Vikhanskiy O.S., Naumov A.I. (2014). Menedzhment [Management] M.: Magistr: NITs INFRA-M. (in Russian).
Zayman S. (2003). Konets marketinga, kakim my ego znaem [The end of marketing as we know it] Minsk: Popurri. (in Russian).
Нечипорук Н. Менеджмент: между наукой и искусствомM21.com.ua. (in Russian). Retrieved August 31, 2018, from http://www.m21.com.ua/?p=330
Страница обновлена: 04.04.2025 в 16:26:30