Why the fruits of scientific and technical intelligence are not available for the agricultural production of the Russian Federation?
Staroverova I.V.1,2, Vartanova M.L.3
1 Правовая защита интеллектуальной собственности
2 Госуниверситет землеустройства
3 Институт социально-политических исследований Российской академии наук (ИСПИ РАН ФНИСЦ)
Download PDF | Downloads: 28 | Citations: 12
Journal paper
Shadow Economy (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку
Volume 2, Number 3 (July-September 2018)
Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39283560
Cited: 12 by 24.01.2023
Abstract:
The article deals with the problems of why in the period of various (neo)liberal transformations, and in particular of the 54 macrotechnologies that determined the world's scientific and technological progress, every third was Soviet. However, at present, the Russian leadership is partially preserved only in aerospace, nuclear power, energy engineering and special metallurgy.
Keywords: production, material and technical basis, transformation, agribusiness, agro-industrial complex, financing, industry, scientific and technical progress, agricultural production
References:
Lavrichenko O.V. (2014). Sistemnyy podkhod k razrabotke nauchnoy kontseptsii innovatsionnyh biznesobrazuyuschikh tekhnologiy [Systematic approach to development of the scientific concept of innovative business-forming technologies]. Creative economy. (10(94)). 32-41. (in Russian).
Sherin V.A., Zhigalova O.V. (2015). Metodicheskoe obespechenie otsenki effektivnosti byudzhetnyh investitsiy v sozdanie vysokotekhnologichnogo tsentra [Methodological support for assessment of the efficiency of public investments in the establishment of a high-tech center]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 5 (1). 27-36. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/inec.
Страница обновлена: 28.04.2025 в 14:48:19