The aims and methods of i «share value creation» concept implication in the perspective of labor

Melnikova L.N.¹
¹ Санкт-Петербургский Государственный экономический Университет

Download PDF | Downloads: 17 | Citations: 2

Journal paper

Russian Journal of Labour Economics ^{(РИНЦ, ВАК)}
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 6, Number 1 (January-March 2019)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37307832
Cited: 2 by 26.03.2022

Abstract:
This article defines the problem of correlation between the social problems and economic activity of the companies. We define the ways of implementation of the share value creation concept. The authors analyze the activity of the companies which implement the concept of share value creation and the influence on labor aspects. We analyze the correlation between the labor aspects and economic results in framework of sustainable development. Also, we analyze the experience of the leading companies, implementing the model in order to improve the economic results and resolve the social and labor problems as well. We offer the model, which offers the solution of economic and social problem, taking into account the environmental factors. We consider the opportunity of implementation the concept in order to improve the labor aspects, for realization of workforce capacity.

Keywords: labor, sustainable development, labor aspects, creating of share values, social and economic correlation

JEL-classification: J01, O10, O35, O19, O44

References:

Andersen N., Murphy T., Börsch A. (2016). Nothing for money: A behavioural perspective on innovation and motivation Deloitte Review. (18). 70-85.
Giddings B., Hopwood B., O'brien G (2002). Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development Sustainable development. (10(4)). 187-196.
Hopwood B., Mellor M., O'Brien G. (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches Sustainable development. (13(1)). 38-52.
Pfitzer M., Bockstette V., Stamp M. (2013). Innovating for shared value Harvard Business Review. (91(9)). 100-107.
Porter M.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of notions Harvard Business Review. (68(2)). 73-93.
Porter M.E. (2000). Raspolozhenie, konkurentsiya i ekonomicheskoe razvitie: mestnye klastery v globalnoy ekonomike [Location, competition and economic development: local clusters in the global economy]. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie. (14(1)). 15-34. (in Russian).
Porter M.E., Krammer M.R. (2011). Strategiya & Obschestva [Strategy & Societies]. Harvard Business Review. 234. (in Russian).
Radjou N., Euchner J. (2016). The Principles of Frugal Innovation: An Interview with Navi Radjou: Navi Radjou talks with Jim Euchner about jugaad and frugal innovation and their place in corporate R&D Research-Technology Management. (59(4)). 13-20.
Radjou N., Prabhu J., Ahuja S. (2012). Jugaad innovation: Think frugal, be flexible, generate breakthrough growth John Wiley & Sons. 315-35-.
Serafeim G., Eccles R.G., Ioannou I. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance Management Science. (60(11)). 2835-2857.
Zeschky M., Widenmayer B., Gassmann O. (2011). Frugal innovation in emerging markets Research Technology Management. (54(4)). 38-45.

Страница обновлена: 31.03.2025 в 06:24:39

Подробнее об авторе: