The phenomenon of alienation of subjects and objects of property in the modern economy

Khodzha Kava¹
¹ Российский экономический университет им. Г.В. Плеханова, Russia

Download PDF | Downloads: 31 | Citations: 2

Journal paper

Creative Economy ^{(РИНЦ, ВАК)}
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 14, Number 4 (April 2020)

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42843237
Cited: 2 by 28.06.2023

Abstract:
This article is devoted to the study of the transformation processes of property as one of the fundamental institutions of civil society. Nowadays the development of the property institution goes in the direction of destroying the connection between the object and the subject of property. There is a tendency of the gradual alienation of the individual not only from the world of things, but also from physical being. The article provides numerous examples that support this hypothesis. A historical retrospective of the property relations transformation helps to distinguish stages of alienation. Firstly, the individual is not only the body, but also the object of the outside world. Secondly, the individual equals to his household. Thirdly, that the individual is only his body and abilities. And today, when even body parts have become the object of sale, we can talk about the complete and comprehensive alienation of the subject from the object of property and the final destruction of the individual integrity. The obtained results are of interest to economics and jurisprudence researchers involved in property relations development.

Keywords: property, property relations, property right, alienation, social differentiation

JEL-classification: D23, K11, P14, P26

References:

Alchian A.A., Demsetz H. (1973). The Property Right Paradigm The Journal of Economic History. 33 (1). 16-27.

Alekseev S.S. (1999). Pravo: azbuka - teoriya - filosofiya. Opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya [Right: ABC - theory - philosophy. Experience of complex research] M.: Statut. (in Russian).

Anisimov A.P., Zemlyakova A.N. (2012). Prinuditelnoe vozniknovenie prava sobstvennosti na zemelnye uchastki kak fenomen rossiyskogo prava [Compulsory occurrence of the property right to the ground sites as a phenomenon of the russian right]. Privity in the Russian Federation. (7(130)). 6-12. (in Russian).

Becker L. (1977). Property Rights. Philosophical Foundations L..

Boulir W. (1995). Sprem. Spleens and others valuables: The need recognize property rights in human body parts Hofstra law review. 23 (3). 693-731.

Coase R.Y. (1937). The Nature of the Firm Economica. 4 (16). 386-405.

Credit-suisse.com. Retrieved from https://www.credit-suisse.com/about-us/en/reports-research/global-wealth-report.html

Dementev V.E. (2002). Korporativnaya sobstvennost i korporativnoe upravlenie [Corporate property and corporate management] M.: GUU. (in Russian).

Dolgopyatova T.G. (2003). Stanovlenie korporativnogo sektora i evolyutsiya aktsionernoy sobstvennosti [The formation of the corporate sector and the evolution of stock ownership] M.: NIU VShE. (in Russian).

Gegel G.V.F. (1990). Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of law] M.: Mysl. (in Russian).

Gerike P.A. (1991). Human Biologisal Material: A Proprietery interest of Part of Monistic Being Ohio northern university law review. 17 (4). 805-825.

Grebennikov V.G. (2014). Formy sobstvennosti, alternativnye chastnoy (istoricheskiy ocherk) [Forms of ownership, alternative to private (historical essay)] M.: TsEMI RAN. (in Russian).

Honore A.M. (1961). Ownership. In Oxford essays in jurisprundence

Kapelyushnikov R.I. (2004). Pravo sobstvennosti (ocherk sovremennoy teorii) [Property rights (an essay on modern theory)]. Domestic notes. (6). 65-81. (in Russian).

Maĭfaĭ A.V., Lisachenko A.B. (2002). Telo cheloveka, ego otdelnye chasti kak obekty pravovogo vozdeĭstviya (nekotorye predlozheniya dlya obsuzhdeniya) [The human body, its individual parts as objects of legal action (some suggestions for discussion)]. Yuridicheskiy mir. (2). 4-15. (in Russian).

Marks K., Engels F. (1974). Ekonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 goda [Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844] M.: Izd-vo polit. literatury. (in Russian).

Nersesyants V.S. (2005). Filosofiya prava M.: Norma.

Nort D.K. (1997). Instituty, institutsionalnye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, institutional changes and economic performance] M.: Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi «Nachala». (in Russian).

Pejovich S. (1981). Fundamentals of economics: a property rights approach Dallas.

Richardson E.H., Turner B.S. (2002). Bodies as Property: From Slavery to DNA Maps Body Lore and Laws.

Sklovskiy K.I. (2010). Sobstvennost v grazhdanskom prave [Property in civil law] M.: Statut. (in Russian).

Tambovtsev V.L. (2015). Prava, formy i rezhimy sobstvennosti [Property Rights, Forms of Ownership, and Property Regimes]. Economics of Contemporary Russia. (1(68)). 7-18. (in Russian).

Uilyamson O.I. (1996). Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma. Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaya» kontraktatsiya [The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets, "relational" contracting] SPb.: Lenizdat. (in Russian).

Ustyuzhanina E.V. i dr. (2016). Institutsionalnaya ekonomika [Institutional Economics] Moscow: FGBOU VO «REU im. G.V. Plekhanova». (in Russian).

Ustyuzhanina E.V., Evsyukov S.G., Petrov A.G. (2010). Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya korporativnogo sektora rossiyskoy ekonomiki [The state and prospects of the corporate sector development in the Russian economy] M.: TsEMI. (in Russian).

Veber M. (1990). Izbrannye sochineniya [Selected works] M.: Progress. (in Russian).

Veblen T. (2008). Teoriya delovogo predpriyatiya [The theory of business enterprise] M.: Delo. (in Russian).

Страница обновлена: 10.05.2025 в 11:59:06

Подробнее об авторе: