Theoretical analysis of the institutional paradigm of regional development by means of the tools of the actor-network theory and the systems analysis

Makarov I.N.1,2, Manasyan S.M.3, Milovanov E.A.3, Baurina M.V.4,5
1 Липецкий филиал Финансового университета при Правительстве Российской Федерации, Russia
2 Липецкий казачий институт технологий и управления (филиал) федерального государственного бюджетного образовательного учреждения высшего образования «Московский государственный университет технологий и управления имени К.Г. Разумовского (Первый казачий университет)», Russia
3 Липецкий филиал РАНХиГС, Russia
4 Сибирский институт управления – филиал Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации
5 Сибирский государственный университет путей сообщения

Journal paper

Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 14, Number 12 (december 2024)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=80348008

Abstract:
Recently, against the background of many publications on the spatial development of the country, whose methodology is changing from elementary statistical analysis to the application of various political-economic models, as well as the principles of economic analysis, it is advisable to analyze the multiregional economic system by combining the principles of a new system analysis and actor-network model, superimposing them on the landscape of institutional methodology. The authors propose an alternative version of the conclusion of the well-known position of the institutional theory about the influence of the previous trajectory of evolution of the environment of the actor's activity and its effectiveness of interaction with this environment, depending on the combination of vectors of these movements (actor and environment) and the structure of their interaction, which can lead to the functionality or dysfunctionality of constituent institutions and, in a negative case, the formation of institutional traps. The authors propose to combine the principles of a new systems analysis and an actor-network model by superimposing them on the landscape of institutional methodology in order to analyze the institutional environment of interacting regions. The research results may be of interest to researchers in regional economics, specialists in mathematical economics and ecophysics, graduate students and undergraduates in economics.

Keywords: system, region, actor, institute, analysis

References:

Abramov V. I., Stolyarov A. D. (2024). Tsifrovye biznes-ekosistemy kak perspektivnaya forma razvitiya regionalnoy ekonomiki [Digital business ecosystems as a promising form of regional economic development]. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. (10). 5523-5542. (in Russian).

Akoff P.L. (1969). Sistemy, organizatsii i mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya [Systems, organizations, and interdisciplinary research] System research. The Yearbook. 143 – 164. (in Russian).

Akoff R.L. (1972). Planirovanie v bolshikh ekonomicheskikh sistemakh [Planning in large economic systems] (in Russian).

Blaug M. (1994). Teoriya obshchego ravnovesiya Izara [Isard's theory of general equilibrium] (in Russian).

Drobot E.V., Makarov I.N., Ryazantseva E.A., Barbashina E.A., Donskoy D.A. (2023). Gosudarstvennaya ekonomicheskaya politika i instrumentariy gosudarstvennogo menedzhmenta kompleksnoy resursoeffektivnosti ekonomiki [State economic policy and administrative tools for economic resource efficiency]. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 13 (12). 6507-6520. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/epp.13.12.120512.

Grachev S.A. (2024). Vliyanie energeticheskoy infrastruktury regionov na innovatsionnuyu sostavlyayushchuyu regionalnoy ekonomiki [The impact of regional energy infrastructure on the innovative component of the regional economy]. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. (11). 6859-6876. (in Russian).

Granberg A.G. (2000). Osnovy regionalnoy ekonomiki [Fundamentals of regional economics] (in Russian).

Hurwicz L. (1996). Institutions as families of game forms The Japanese Economic Review. (1). 113 – 132.

Khodzhson Dzh. (2000). Privychki, pravila i ekonomicheskoe povedenie [Habits, rules, and economic behavior]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. (1). 39 –55. (in Russian).

Khodzhson Dzh. (2003). Ekonomicheskaya teoriya i instituty: Manifest sovremennoy institutsionalnoy ekonomicheskoy teorii [Economic Theory and Institutions: A Manifesto of Modern Institutional Economic Theory] (in Russian).

Kleyner G.B. (2011). Mezoekonomika razvitiya [Mesoeconomics of development] (in Russian).

Lugovoy O., Dashkevich V., Mazaev I., Polyakov E., Fomchenko D., Khekht A. (2007). Ekonomiko-geograficheskie i institutsionalnye aspekty ekonomicheskogo rosta v regionakh [Economic, geographical and institutional aspects of economic growth in the regions] (in Russian).

Lvov D.S. (2001). Institutsionalnaya ekonomika [Institutional economics] (in Russian).

Lvov D.S. (2002). Ekonomika razvitiya [Development economics] (in Russian).

Makarov I.N., Kolesnikov V.V., Nazarenko V.S., Solodovnik Yu.A., Yushkov M.A. (2024). Sovremennye podkhody k upravleniyu prostranstvennym razvitiem neurbanizirovannyh territoriy Rossii [Modern approaches to managing spatial development of Russia's non-urbanized territories]. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 14 (10). 5573-5582. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/epp.14.10.121919.

Mikhaylova A.V., Romanova O.D., Barashkova K.D. (2024). Ekonomika vpechatleniy v kontekste regionalnoy ekonomiki [Experience economy in regional context]. Creative economy. (9). 2355-2374. (in Russian).

Miller A.E. (2023). Transformatsiya parametrov ustoychivosti regionalnoy ekonomiki v kontekste razvitiya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti [Transformation of regional economic sustainability parameters in the context of economic security development]. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost. (3). 1103-1120. (in Russian).

Miller A.E. (2024). Riski i ugrozy ustoychivosti regionalnoy ekonomiki v usloviyakh sovremennyh vyzovov [Risks and threats to the regional economy sustainability amidst modern challenges]. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost. (10). 2565-2584. (in Russian).

Nazarenko V. S., Makarov I. N. (2024). Metodologicheskie osnovy formirovaniya modeley prostranstvennogo razmeshcheniya i demograficheskoy dinamiki naseleniya kak otobrazheniya prostranstvenno-resursnogo podkhoda [Methodological foundations for modeling spatial distribution and demographic dynamics as a representation of the spatial resource approach]. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 14 (10). 5557-5572. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/epp.14.10.121932.

Nort D. (1997). Instituty, institutsionalnye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, institutional changes, and the functioning of the economy] (in Russian).

Nureev R.M. (2005). Teoriya obshchestvennogo vybora: kurs lektsiy [Theory of public choice] (in Russian).

Nureev R.M. (2009). Rossiya: osobennosti institutsionalnogo razvitiya [Russia: features of institutional development] (in Russian).

Okorokov V.M., Klikunov N.D., Zyukin D.V. (2024). Teoreticheskie aspekty primeneniya modeli Baumolya k otsenke proizvoditelnosti truda v otdelnyh otraslyakh regionalnoy ekonomiki [Theoretical aspects of the application of the baumol model to the assessment of labor productivity in certain sectors of the regional economy]. Russian Journal of Labor Economics. (8). 1277-1288. (in Russian).

Schepakin M.B., Pakhiev R.A. (2023). Chelovecheskiy kapital v implementatsii innovatsionnogo vektora razvitiya kak klyuchevoy faktor obespecheniya konkurentoustoychivosti regionalnoy ekonomiki [Human capital in the implementation of the innovative development vector as a key factor in ensuring the regional economy competitiveness]. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. (11). 4731-4752. (in Russian).

Schepakin M.B., Schepakina P.M. (2024). Model upravleniya chelovecheskim kapitalom v regionalnoy ekonomike v usloviyakh aktivizatsii deystviya innovatsionnogo faktora v formate mobilizatsionnyh izmeneniy [The model of human resources management in the regional economy in the conditions of the innovative factor in the format of mobilization changes]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. (1). 175-204. (in Russian).

Shastitko A.E. (1998). Neoinstitutsionalnaya ekonomicheskaya teoriya [Neo-institutional economic theory] (in Russian).

Shastitko A.E. (2002). Novaya institutsionalnaya ekonomicheskaya teoriya [New institutional economic theory] (in Russian).

Shastitko A.E. (2004). Reforma antimonopolnogo regulirovaniya v Rossii: povestka dnya i dizayn diskussii [Antimonopoly regulation reform in Russia: agenda and discussion design]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. (3). 140 – 148. (in Russian).

Smyslova O.Yu., Fattakhov R.V., Makarov I.N., Pankin P.V. (2024). Ustoychivost funktsionirovaniya infrastruktury neurbanizirovannyh territoriy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: teoreticheskiy podkhod k opredeleniyu i formy proyavleniya [Sustainability of the functioning of the infrastructure of non-urbanized territories in the Russian Federation: a theoretical approach to the definition and forms of manifestation]. Vestnik of Voronezh state agrarian university. 17 (3(82)). 133-147. (in Russian). doi: 10.53914/issn2071-2243_2024_3_133.

Uilyamson O.I. (1996). Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma: Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaya» kontraktatsiya [Economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, "relational" contracting] (in Russian).

Williamson O.E. (1981). The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes Journal of Economic Literature. 19 1537 – 1568.

Williamson O.E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives Administrative Science Quarterly. (36 (2)). 269 – 296.

Страница обновлена: 28.04.2025 в 01:32:36