The main approaches to assess the viability of an organization in the selection of innovative projects

Ponikarova A.S.1
1 Казанский национальный исследовательский технологический университет

Journal paper

Russian Journal of Innovation Economics (РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 13, Number 4 (October-December 2023)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=63633379

Abstract:
The main approaches to the assessment of innovative projects presented in the article differ from the existing directions by a new set of indicators. They allow not only to determine the economic efficiency of the proposed innovative changes, but also to analyze the degree of the company's readiness for innovative changes and to assess the availability of the company's resources during the innovative development. Author's approach is based on the concept of survivability, as a special ability of the system to maintain the ability to implement basic functions even under the influence of disturbances and risks. They accompany the whole set of innovative changes in view of the heterogeneity of the transformation of the components of production potential, the degree of balance of management decisions and the peculiarities of replacing the elements of these components in the course of innovative development. The author considers the prerequisites for the emergence of a new approach in assessing innovative approaches, its relevance and difference from existing ones, characterizes new components and identifies the main points of application and promotion of the methodology as a tool of modern risk management. The methodological developments proposed in the article may be of interest to domestic and foreign scientists who deal with the problems of analyzing and evaluating innovative projects and determining their effectiveness.

Keywords: organizational vitality, innovative project evaluation, innovation management

References:

Ambrosimov A.A. (2000). Upravlenie promyshlennoy bezopasnostyu [Industrial Safety Management] (in Russian).

Beynerte L., Stradinya S. (2016). Ustoychivost kompaniy, kak faktor razvitiya kompanii na raznyh etapakh zhiznennogo tsikla [Sustainability of companies as a factor of company development at different stages of the life cycle]. World science. (3(7)). (in Russian).

Denisov A.V. (2002). Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po otsenke ushcherba ot avariy na opasnyh proizvodstvennyh obektakh. (RD 03-496-02) [Methodological recommendations for assessing damage from accidents at hazardous production facilities] (in Russian).

Gilyazutdinova I. V., Ponikarova A. S., Romanova A. I. (2016). Technique of the analysis and assessment of innovative industrial risks at different stages of innovative activity International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. (2). 74-81.

Gilyazutdinova I. V., Ponikarova A.S., Krasnova A.V. (2011). Sovershenstvovanie metodologii otsenki effektivnosti sistem upravleniya innovatsionnymi promyshlennymi riskami dlya dostizheniya ustoychivogo innovatsionnogo razvitiya predpriyatiy neftekhimicheskogo kompleksa Respubliki Tatarstan [Improving the methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of innovative industrial risk management systems to achieve sustainable innovative development of enterprises of the petrochemical complex of the Republic of Tatarstan]. Bulletin of Kazan National Research Technological University. (23). 211-216. (in Russian).

Gilyazutdinova I.V., Akhmetzyanova S.S. (2006). Upravlenie innovatsionnym razvitiem proizvodstvennogo potentsiala predpriyatiy neftegazokhimicheskogo kompleksa Respubliki Tatarstan [Management of innovative development of the production potential of enterprises of the petrochemical complex of the Republic of Tatarstan]. Bulletin of Kazan National Research Technological University. (12). 134-146. (in Russian).

Gilyazutdinova I.V., Gorelova E.N. (2009). Vliyanie organizatsionno-ekonomicheskikh preobrazovaniy na innovatsionnuyu aktivnost v sfere proizvodstvennoy infrastruktury [The impact of organizational and economic transformations on innovation activity in the field of industrial infrastructure]. Bulletin of Kazan National Research Technological University. (5). 263-268. (in Russian).

Gorelova E. N. (2009). Sostoyanie i otsenka innovatsionnoy aktivnosti organizatsiy v sfere proizvodstvennoy infrastruktury [Condition and evaluation of innovative activity organizations in the field of industrial infrastructure]. Economic Bulletin of the Republic of Tatarstan. (4). 46-50. (in Russian).

Kadeev Z. K., Ponikarova A. S., Zotov M. A. (2020). The issues of sustainable management of innovative industrial risks during sustainable development of entities Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. (2(48)). 400-409. doi: 10.14505/jarle.v11.2(48).13.

Khismatullina A. M., Girfanova E.Yu. (2014). Otsenka konkurentnoy sredy neftepererabatyvayushchey otrasli Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Assessment of the competitive environment of the oil refining industry of the Russian Federation]. Bulletin of Kazan National Research Technological University. (16). 210-213. (in Russian).

Khokhlov N.V. (2001). Upravlenie riskom [Risk management] (in Russian).

Kusi-Sarpong S., Gupta H., Sarkis J. (2019). A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology International Journal of Production Research. (57(7)). 1990-2008. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1518607.

Novikov A.M., Novikov D.A. (2014). Metodologiya nauchnogo issledovaniya [Methodology of scientific research] (in Russian).

Nurmieva A. N., Grifanova E.Yu. (2022). Gosudarstvo i biznes: vzaimoobuslovlennost tseley razvitiya v tsifrovoy ekonomike [Government and business: interdependence of development goals in the digital economy] Nugaev readings: The 1st All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. 202-203. (in Russian).

Ponikarov S. I., Ponikarova A. S., Zotov M. A., Surzhko N. V., Gilyazutdinova I. V. (2014). Razrabotka modeli upravleniya innovatsionnoy nadezhnostyu na osnove strukturno-funktsionalnoy zhivuchesti [Development of an innovative reliability management model based on structural and functional survivability]. Bulletin of Kazan National Research Technological University. (1). 289-294. (in Russian).

Santo B. (2004). Sila innovatsionnogo samorazvitiya [The power of innovative self-development]. Innovations. (2). 6-8. (in Russian).

Semenov G.V., Nikolaev M.V., Savelichev M.V. (2004). Issledovanie i otsenka organizatsionnoy effektivnosti sistem upravleniya [Research and evaluation of the organizational effectiveness of management systems] (in Russian).

Tatulov B. E. (2005). Problemy otsenki effektivnosti upravleniya personalom [Problems of evaluating the effectiveness of personnel management]. Ekonomika Rossii: osnovnye napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya. (5). 12-13. (in Russian).

Trofimova A.A. (2003). Upravlenie innovatsionnym razvitiem predpriyatiya [Management of innovative development of the enterprise] (in Russian).

Zotov M.A., Ponikarova A.S., Gilyazutdinova I.V. (2017). Novye podkhody k upravleniyu promyshlennymi riskami sovremennyh predpriyatiy na osnove kompleksnoy metodiki otsenki ikh zhivuchesti [New approaches to the management of industrial risks of modern enterprises on the basis of complex methods of assessing their survivability]. Upravlenie ustoychivym razvitiem. (3(10)). 11-17. (in Russian).

Zotov M.A., Ponikarova A.S., Gilyazutdinova I.V., Salin A.A. (2022). Otsenka sbalansirovannosti innovatsionnogo ustoychivogo razvitiya kak faktor povysheniya promyshlennoy bezopasnosti predpriyatiya [Assessing the balance of innovative sustainable development as a factor in increasing the industrial safety of an enterprise]. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. (4). 2529-2544. (in Russian).

Страница обновлена: 25.03.2025 в 23:22:18