Социальные и экологические риски автоматизации и роботизации в промышленности и торговле: методологический аспект
Толмачев А.Д.1, Толмачев О.М.1, Копылов И.А.2
1 Московский государственный технический университет имени Н.Э. Баумана (МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана)
2 Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации
Download PDF | Downloads: 31 | Citations: 3
Journal paper
Economics and society: contemporary models of development (РИНЦ)
опубликовать статью
Volume 9, Number 1 (January-March 2019)
Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38479965
Cited: 3 by 07.12.2023
Abstract:
Purpose: on the basis of the analysis of literary sources, as well as international experience in the development of automation and robotization of industry and commerce, explore the methodological aspect of the social and environmental risks in this area. Materials and methods: the methodological basis of this article is the literature on the development of automation and robotization of industry and commerce, as well as open analytical materials on social and environmental risks in this area. Results: this article defines the essence of automation and robotization of industry and commerce at the present stage. The analysis of social and environmental risks in this regard. Conclusions: automation and robotics in recent years, more and more penetrates into all areas of production and technology. In today's world, computers are an integral part of most of our jobs. At the moment, computer scientists and economists are considering various options for how such deep automation and robotics will affect the future work of many people around the globe. With widespread automation and robotics, most jobs with manual operations will be replaced by technological robots. Nowadays, robots are widely used in industry, food production, medical science and practice. As a result of robotization, the growth of production productivity in any field of activity, and, as a result, the growth of economic development and specific GDP per person has been accomplished and continues. As a result, due to automation and robotics, people have the opportunity to work only 40 hours a week, consuming, at the same time, a lot of amenities of civilization. To date, robots carry out a variety of work and tasks, it is a simple movement of goods, and difficult technological operations. Now in the twenty-first century, experts expect a serious displacement of workers from the conveyor production. Already at the moment workers on the conveyor are imperceptibly replaced by machines. Because they do work much more successfully and much more accurately. And this best explains the manufacturing process of semiconductor processors. Automation and robotization of production will undoubtedly develop at a rapid pace. However, with the widespread introduction of robots and machines in industry and trade, humanity faces various social and environmental risks. Application: the findings and results of the study can be used in the development of modern structures to minimize social and environmental risks in the process of automation and robotics in industry and trade.
Keywords: social risk, environmental risk, automation, robotics, innovation, industry, trade
References:
2. Barseghyan A.A. Identification and identification of business risks. Economics and Management: Collection of scientific papers. Part 4. SPb.: Publishing house of St. Petersburg State University of Economics and Finance, 2010 (in Russ.)
3. Bondareva N.N. The state and prospects of development of robotization: in the world and Russia. MIR (Modernization. Innovations. Research). 2016; 7(3): 49–57 (in Russ.)
4. Grinin L.E., Grinin A.L. The coming technological revolution and global risks. Globalization processes. 2017; (4): 19–22 (in Russ.)
5. Kruglov D.V. The impact of digital technologies on the quality of human resources. Russian Journal of Labor Economics. 2018; 5(4). doi: 10.18334/ et.5.4.39631 (in Russ.)
6. Lyasnikov N.V., Dudin M.N. The organization of strategic sustainability – in the context of the concept of development of the innovation system of corporate governance in industrial enterprises. Actual problems of the humanities and natural sciences. 2009; (8): 76–79 (in Russ.)
7. Reshetov K.Yu. The role of te cluster approach in ensuring the competitiveness of domestic innovative business structures in the context of the WTO. Creative Economy. 2014; (12): 13–22 (in Russ.)
8. Stupakov V.S., Tokarenko G.S. Risk management. M.: Finance and Statistics, 2015. P. 23 (in Russ.)
9. Tarev A.M. Environmental risks in the management system of the automobile industry. Social and economic sciences. 2013; (8): 63–68 (in Russ.)
10. Kharitonenkov A.S. The evolution of the administrative-legal mechanism of management of national projects and state programs. State administration. 2011; (26).
11. Dudin M.N., Lyasnikov N.V., Dzhurabaeva G.K., Dzhurabaev K.T., Reshetov K.Yu. Improving the innovative strategy of interaction of large industrial enterprises and small entrepreneurship in the agro-industrial sector. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia. 2015; 12(1): 159–167.
12. Marsden T., Sonnino R. Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies. 2008; 24(4): 422–431.
13. Cheyns E., Daviron B., Djama M., Fouilleux E., Guéneau S. The standardization of sustainable development through the insertion of agricultural global value chains into international markets. Sustainable Development and Tropical Agri-chains. Springer, Dordrecht, 2017: 283–303.
14. Giannakis E., Bruggeman A. The highly variable economic performance of European agriculture. Land Use Policy. 2015; 45: 26–35. 15. Wiegman O., Gutteling J., Cadet B. Perception of Nuclear Energy and Coal in France and the Netherlands. Risk Analysis. August 1995; 15(4): 513–521
Страница обновлена: 29.04.2025 в 01:00:23