The impact of introduction of innovation and robotization on labor market development in the countries of the Visegrad Group

Kopylov K.R.¹
¹ Национальный исследовательский технологический университет "МИСиС"

Download PDF | Downloads: 36 | Citations: 2

Journal paper

Russian Journal of Innovation Economics ^{(РИНЦ, ВАК)}
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 7, Number 3 (July-September 2017)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30107676
Cited: 2 by 26.03.2022

Abstract:
The article predicts the impact of innovation on labor market development in the countries of the Visegrad Group. We show the differences in the situation of production robotization between the Western countries, particularly the US and studied post-Communist countries of the Central Europe. We consider the positive side of the introduction of innovations. However, we mark that this process can have a negative effect on the labor market in the studied countries, in particular, on the growth of unemployment rate. It can be caused by job cuts caused by robatization of enterpises and by the lack of sufficient number of new jobs in manufacturing, service and sales of robots. That could potentially take place in the United States and other countries-leaders in robotics technologies. We also see the need to further study the impact of immigration of low-skilled workers in the studied countries, because the immigration may create additional problems in the labor market due to potential job cuts.

Keywords: labor market, information technology, market economy, transition economy, post-communist countries, Visegrad group, economy of Central Europe, robotization

JEL-classification: O31, O33, J29, P29

Highlights:

В статье рассмотрено влияние инноваций на развитие рынка труда в странах Вышеградской группы. Показаны отличия в ситуации с роботизацией производства между западными странами, в частности, США и изучаемыми посткоммунистическими странами Центральной Европы. Было отмечено, что помимо положительных эффектов, стимулирующих рост конкурентоспособности экономики, данный процесс может оказать негативный эффект на рынок труда в изучаемых странах, в частности, на рост безработицы.
Он может быть вызван отсутствием компенсации сокращенных рабочих мест из-за роботизации предприятий созданием достаточного количества новых рабочих мест в сфере производства, обслуживания и продажи роботов, что потенциально может иметь места в США и других странах- флагманах в сфере роботостроения. Отмечается необходимость дальнейшего изучения иных новых факторов, влияющих на развитие рынка труда в странах Вышеградской группы.

References:

Cornell INSEAD WIPOThe Global Innovation Index. Retrieved January 08, 2017, from https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2016-report#
Ford M. (2015). Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future New York: Basic Books.
Kopylov K.R. (2016). About the Economic Transformation in the Post-Communist Countries of Central Europe National Journal. (1). 1-5.
Kopylov K.R. (2017). Nachalo ekonomicheskoy transformatsii postkommunisticheskikh stran Tsentralnoy Evropy [The beginning of the economic transformation of the post-communist countries of Central Europe]. Vestnik Mariyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Selskokhozyaystvennye nauki. Ekonomicheskie nauki. 3 (1(9)). 91-96. (in Russian).
Kopylov K.R. (2017). Rabochaya sila i rynok truda v postkommunisticheskikh stranakh Tsentralnoy i Vostochnoy Evropy [Labor force and labor market in post-communist countries of Central and Eastern Europe]. Konkurentosposobnost v globalnom mire: ekonomika, nauka, tekhnologii. (3-5(36)). 81-84. (in Russian).
Kopylov K.R. (2017). Rol mestnogo samoupravleniya v transformatsii postkommunisticheskikh stran Vyshegradskoy gruppy [The role of local self-government in the transformation of the post-communist countries of the Visegrad group]. Konkurentosposobnost v globalnom mire: ekonomika, nauka, tekhnologii. (2-3(31)). 65-68. (in Russian).
McKinsey. Automation potentional and wages for US jobsPublic. Retrieved January 08, 2017, from https://.tableau.com/profile/mckinsey.analytics#!/vizhome/AutomationandUSjobs/Technicalpotentialforautomation
The Boston Consulting Group. Takeoff in Robotics Will Power the Next Productivity Surge in ManufacturingThe Boston Consulting Group. Retrieved January 08, 2017, from http://www.bcg.com/en-za/d/press/10feb2015-robotics-power-productivity-surge-manufacturing-838
The new hire: How a new generation of robots is transforming manufacturingPwC. Retrieved January 08, 2017, from https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industrial-products/assets/industrial-robot-trends-in-manufacturing-report.pdf
Tolkachev S.A., Kulakov A.D. (2016). Robotizatsiya kak napravlenie neoindustrializatsii (na primere SShA) [Robotization as the direction of neoindustrialization (on the example of the usa)]. Mir novoy ekonomiki. (2). 79-87. (in Russian).
Transparency International. The Corruption Perception IndexTi. Retrieved January 08, 2017, from http://transparency.org.ru/images/docs/cpi/CPI2015_Table_RU.pdf
World bank grou. Retrieved January 08, 2017, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS?locations=PL-CZ-HU-SK
World bank group. Retrieved January 08, 2017, from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdf
Zhdankin N.A. (2017). Innovatsionnyy menedzhment [Innovation management] Moscow: KNORUS. (in Russian).
Zhukovskiy V.S. (2013). Defolt «ekonomiki truby» [The default of the "pipe economy"]. Economic strategies. (4). 92-103. (in Russian).
База данных Всемирного банка. Retrieved January 08, 2017, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.SRV.TETC.ZS?locations=PL-CZ-HU-SK

Страница обновлена: 02.05.2025 в 02:25:25

Подробнее об авторе: