Industrial and technological cooperation of large businesses and SME-structures: the experience of the Russian Federation and foreign countries in technological import substitution

Nevmyvako V.P.¹
¹ Институт проблем рынка РАН, Russia

Download PDF | Downloads: 31 | Citations: 7

Journal paper

Economics and society: contemporary models of development ^(РИНЦ)
опубликовать статью

Volume 11, Number 2 (April-June 2021)

Citation:

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46353817
Cited: 7 by 07.12.2023

Abstract:
Subject/Topic. The article is devoted to the study of Russian and foreign experience in the implementation of industrial and technological cooperation of large and small businesses within the framework of the policy of technological import substitution. Methodology. In the process of conducting scientific research, the author applied a number of general scientific methods of the empirical group (observation, comparison, measurement, analysis and synthesis, logical reasoning) and separate specifically scientific methods (static analysis, expert assessments, graphic method, as well as strategic management methods, such as SWOT analysis, PEST analysis, Foresight tools). To study the processes of evolution of industrial and technological cooperation in the Russian Federation, taking into account changes in external challenges and threats, as well as national priorities for the formation of the digital economy, problem-chronological and historical-genetic methods of scientific knowledge were used. Results. Based on the results of the scientific study, it was found that the organization of industrial and technological cooperation in foreign practice is focused on finding and applying the best practices of market mechanisms of inter-firm cooperation of large and small businesses, regardless of the scope and scale of their activities. In domestic practice, the emphasis in cooperation, on the contrary, is focused on large-scale state programs and mesolevel forms of organization of inter-firm cooperation in the field of technology transfer, where SMEs are assigned the indirect role of point actors to help megabusiness break down R&D programs by transferring non-critical work and services to peripheral participants through the outsourcing mechanism. Conclusion/Significance. As part of the scientific study, the following proposals of the author were made regarding the further development of industrial and technological cooperation of corporate business and entities: 1) the development of new institutional entities - state digital platforms and thematic marketplaces; 2) involvement of SMEs in a national project dedicated to the reform of the military-industrial complex of the Russian Federation «Conversion» and the production of civilian and dual-use products; 3) involving innovative infrastructure in the processes of organizing, managing and promoting the development of industrial and technological cooperation of large businesses and SMEs based on technology parks and industrial clusters; 4) development of the national market of services in the field of project management to manage the processes of industrial and technological cooperation of SMEs and large businesses. Application. The results of scientific research can be used to develop the academic competencies of students in the organization of industrial and technological cooperation in the digital economy, as well as practitioners for the development of professional competencies in the field of managing projects of industrial and technological cooperation of large businesses and small businesses, for example, within the framework of technology parks and business incubators, taking into account current goals, priorities and threats to the functioning of the socio-economic system format Industry 4.0.

Keywords: digital economy, inter-firm cooperation, technological superiority, import substitution, technology transfer, innovative infrastructure, Industry 4.0, win-win partnership

JEL-classification: O25, O33

References:

Directive 2004/17/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 31 mars 2004 portant coordination des procédures de passation des marchés dans les secteurs de l'eau, de l'énergie, des transports et des services postaux (2004). Journal officiel de lʼUnion européenne. (134). 0001-0113.

Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (2004). Journal officiel de l'Union européenne. (134). 0114-0240.

Maloe i srednee predprinimatelstvo v Rossii. 2019 [Small and medium-sized businesses in Russia. 2019] (2019). M.: Rosstat. (in Russian).

Promyshlennoe proizvodstvo v Rossii. 2019 [Industrial production in Russia. 2019] (2019). M.: Rosstat. (in Russian).

Adams J.D., Marcu M. (2004). R&D Sourcing, Joint Ventures and Innovation: A Multiple Indicators Approach Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research Inc.

Barefoot K., Curtis D., Jolliff W., Nicholson J.R., Omohundro R. Defining and Measuring the Digital EconomyBea.gov. Retrieved from https://www.bea.gov/system/files/papers/WP2018-4.pdf

Bukharova M.M., Danilov L.V., Kashinova E.A. i dr. (2020). Tekhnoparki Rossii: ezhegodnyy obzor [Technoparks of Russia: annual review] M.: AKIT RF. (in Russian).

Bulatov A.N. (2010). Institut promyshlennoy kooperatsii v sovremennoy ekonomike [Institute of Industrial Cooperation in the Modern Economy]. Regional Economics: Theory and Pactice. (31). 55-59. (in Russian).

Bönte W., Keilbach M. (2005). Concubinage or marriage? Informal and formal cooperations for innovation International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier. 23 (3-4). 279-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.01.007.

DeNisi A., Pritchard R. (2006). Performance appraisal, performance management, and improving individual performance: A motivational framework Management and Organization Review. 2 (2). 253-277. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00042.x.

Glaister K.W., Buckley P.J. (1996). Strategic Motives For International Alliance Formation Journal of Management Studies. 33 (3). 301-332. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00804.x.

Gokhberg L.M., Ditkovskiy K.A., Evnevich E.I. i dr. (2020). Indikatory innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti: 2020 [Innovation activity indicators: 2020] M.: NIU VShE. (in Russian).

Gokhberg L.M., Ditkovskiy K.A., kuznetsova I.A. i dr. (2019). Indikatory innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti: 2019 [Innovation activity indicators: 2019] M.: NIU VShE. (in Russian).

Gomes-Casseres B., Hagedoorn J., Jaffe A. (2006). Do Alliances Promote Knowledge Flows Journal of Financial Economics. 80 (1). 5-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.08.011.

Gorodnikova N.V., Gokhberg L.M., Ditkovskiy K.A. i dr. (2018). Indikatory innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti: 2018 [Innovation activity indicators: 2018] M.: NIU VShE. (in Russian).

Grudtsyna L.Yu. (2020). «Novyy kurs dlya zabytogo naroda»: plan ekonomicheskoy podderzhki gosudarstvom malogo biznesa kak osnova gosudarstvennoy podderzhki naroda [«a new deal for the forgotten people»: a plan for state economic support for small businesses as the basis of state support for the people]. Obrazovanie i pravo. (2). 21-23. (in Russian). doi: 10.24411/2076-1503-2020-10203 .

Ivanov V.V., Malinetskiy G.G. (2017). Tsifrovaya ekonomika: mify, realnost, perspektiva [Digital economy: myths, reality, perspective] M.: Upravlenie nauchno-izdatelskoy deyatelnosti RAN. (in Russian).

Karlik A.E. (2020). Mezhfirmennaya kooperatsiya kak faktor promyshlennogo razvitiya v informatsionno-setevoy ekonomike [Inter-firm cooperation as a factor of industrial development in the network information economy]. Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg State University of Economics. (6(126)). 7-14. (in Russian).

McLuhan M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Negroponte N. (1995). Being Digital NY: Knopf.

Nikulina O.V., Kuznetsov A.A. (2016). Mezhdunarodnaya kooperatsiya kak mekhanizm vzaimodeystviya promyshlennyh predpriyatiy v sfere innovatsiy [International cooperation as a mechanism for industrial enterprises'' interaction in innovation]. National interests: priorities and security. 12 (4(337)). 88-102. (in Russian).

Ortiz C.A., Park M. (2010). Visual Controls: Applying Visual Management to the Factory New York: Productivity Press.

Palmberg C., Pajarinen M. Determinants of Internationalisation through Strategic Alliances - Insights Based on New Data on Large Finnish FirmsThe Research Institute of the Finnish Economy Discussion Papers 966. Retrieved from https://www.etla.fi/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/dp966.pdf

Plotnikov V.A. (2020). Tsifrovizatsiya kak zakonomernyy etap evolyutsii ekonomicheskoy sistemy [Digitization as a logical stage in the evolution of an economic system]. The Economic Revival of Russia. (2). 104-115. (in Russian). doi: 10.37930/1990-9780-2020-2-64-104-115 .

Popov E.V., Simonova V.L., Tikhonova A.D. (2019). Faktornaya model razvitiya innovatsionnyh ekosistem [Factor model for the development of innovative ecosystems]. Innovations. (10(252)). 88-100. (in Russian). doi: 10.26310/2071-3010.2019.252.10.011 .

Rodrik D. (2016). Premature Deindustrialization Journal of Economic Growth. 21 (1). 1-33. doi: 10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3.

Soldatova S.S., Pivkina K.R. (2020). Ekonomicheskie posledstviya pandemii «COVID-19» dlya Rossii [Economic consequences of the pandemic «COVID-19» for Russia]. StudNet. (2). 260-265. (in Russian).

Tarasov I.V. (2018). Industriya 4.0: ponyatie, kontseptsii, tendentsii razvitiya [Industry 4.0: concept & development]. Strategii biznesa. (6(50)). 57-63. (in Russian).

The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999Perevodzakonov.ru. Retrieved from https://perevodzakonov.ru/perevod-s-angliyskogo/zakon-o-dogovorah-prava-thetyih-lits

The Small Business Subcontracting Program (48 CFR Part 19, Subpart 19.7)Law.cornell.edu. Retrieved April 29, 2021, from https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/48/part-19/subpart-19.7

Trachuk A.V., Linder N.V. (2021). Vliyanie finansovogo kapitala na transformatsiyu innovatsionnogo povedeniya promyshlennyh kompaniy [The impact of financial capital on innovative behavior of industrial companies]. Finance: Theory and Practice». 25 (1). 51-69. (in Russian). doi: 10.26794/2587-56712021-25-1-51-69.

Zemtsov S.P., Tsareva Yu.V. (2020). Tendentsii razvitiya sektora malyh i srednikh predpriyatiy v usloviyakh pandemii i krizisa [Development trends of small and medium-sized enterprises amid pandemic-induced crisis]. Russian Economic Developments. 27 (5). 71-82. (in Russian).

Страница обновлена: 11.04.2025 в 08:41:30

Подробнее об авторе: