Journal of Central Asia Economy Journal of Central Asia Economy Экономика Центральной Азии 2542-0607 BIBLIO-GLOBUS Publishing House 125005 10.18334/asia.10.2.125005 BJAZHL Articles Статьи Research Article Driving factors behind the introduction of innovative technologies for agriculture sustainable development in the Republic of Tajikistan: literature review Основные факторы внедрения инновационных технологий для устойчивого развития сельскохозяйственного сектора Республики Таджикистан: обзор литературы https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4788-7335 Goibov Manuchekhr Amonulloevich Гоибов Манучехр Амонуллоевич

заведующий отделом изучения инновационных процессов в агропрмышленном комплексе, Институт экономики и системного анализа развития сельского хозяйства Таджикской академии сельскохозяйственных наук, доктор экономики, PhD

 goibovm@mail.ru Tajik Academy of Agricultural Sciences Таджикская академия сельскохозяйственных наук 30 06 2026 10 2 VOL 10, NO2 (2026) ТОМ 10, №2 (2026) 19 02 2026 31 03 2026 Copyright ©; 2026, Goibov M.A. Copyright ©; 2026, Гоибов М.А. 2026 Goibov M.A. Гоибов М.А. https://1economic.ru/lib/125005

The need for innovation in Tajikistan's agriculture, while highly significant and widely recognized, still has not reached the level of implementation required by the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. The article presents the main reasons for this phenomenon, taking into account an analysis of factors influencing farmers' behavior as participants in the implementation of innovative technologies in the modern world. the article highlights a number of factors contributing to their implementation, including psychological and socio-demographic factors. The article identifies potential areas for research on the dynamics of innovative technology implementation in the country's agricultural sector.

Необходимость инноваций, в аграрном секторе Таджикистана имея высокую значимость и получив широкое признание, до сих пор не достигают уровня внедрения согласно Целям устойчивого развития до 2030 года. Приводятся основные причины данного явления с учетом анализа факторов, влияющих на поведение фермеров как участников внедрения инновационных технологий в современном мире. Показан ряд факторов, способствующих их внедрению. В т.ч. психологические и социально-демографические. Выявлены потенциальные направления для исследований динамики внедрения инновационных технологий в сельскохозяйственном секторе страны

 factors sustainability agriculture organic agriculture farmer behavior innovation technology факторы устойчивость сельское хозяйств органическое сельское хозяйство Поведение фермеров инновации технологии 1. Постановление Правительства Республики Таджикистан от 30 декабря 2019 года № 642, «О Концепции цифровой экономики в Республике Таджикистан» 2. Постановление Правительства Республики Таджикистан от 3 марта 2014 года№ 144, «О Концепции инновационного развития Агропромышленного сектора Республики Таджикистан» 3. Постановление Правительства Республики Таджикистан от 1 октября 2016 года, №392 «Об утверждении проекта Национальной Стратегии Развития Республики Таджикистан на период до 2030 года» 4. Abay K., Blalock G., Berhane G. Locus of control and technology adoption in developing country agriculture: Evidence from Ethiopia // Journal Of Economic Behavior Organization. – 2017. – p. 98-115. – doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.09.012. 5. Adesina A., Zinnah M. Technology characteristics, farmers' perceptions and adoption decisions: A Tobit model application in Sierra Leone // Agricultural Economics. – 1993. – № 4. – p. 297-311. – doi: 10.1016/0169-5150(93)90019-9. 6. Aker, J. (2011). Dial 'A' for Agriculture: A Review of Information and Communication Technologies for Agricultural Extension in Developing Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1942954 7. Barnes AP, Soto I, Eory V, Beck B, Balafoutis A, Sánchez B, Vangeyte S, van der Fountas T, Wal, and Gómez- Barbero M, (2019) Exploring the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: a cross regional study of EU farmers. Land use policy 80:163–174 8. Bianchi M.C., Bava L., Sandrucci A., Tangorra F.M., Tamburini A., Gislon G., Zucali M. Diffusion of precision livestock farming technologies in dairy cattle farms // Animal. – 2022. – № 11. – p. 100650. 9. Caffaro F., Roccato M., Micheletti Cremasco M., Cavallo E. An ergonomic approach to sustainable development: the role of information environment and social psychological variables in the adoption of agri-environmental innovations // Sustain Dev. – 2019. – № 6. – p. 1049–1062. 10. Canaj K., Mehmeti A., Morrone D., Toma P., Todorović M. Life cycle-based evaluation of environmental impacts and external costs of treated wastewater reuse for irrigation: a case study in southern Italy // J Clean Prod. – 2021. – p. 126142. 11. Chiriacò M.V., Grossi G., Castaldi S., Valentini R. The contribution to climate change of the organic versus conventional wheat farming: a case study on the carbon footprint of whole meal bread production in Italy // J Clean Prod 153:309–319 conventional to sustainable agriculture. Adv Agron. – 2017. – p. 155-198. 12. Creissen H.E., Jones P.J., Tranter R.B., Girling R.D., Jess S., Burnett F.J., Gaffney M., Thorne F.S., Kildea S. Identifying the drivers and constraints to adoption of IPM among arable farmers in the UK and Ireland // Pest Manag Sci. – 2021. – p. 4148–4158. 13. D’Amato A., Mazzanti M., Nicolli F. Green technologies and environmental policies for sustainable development: testing direct and indirect impacts // J Clean Prod. – 2021. – p. 127060. 14. de Janvry A.., Sadoulet E. World Poverty and the Role of Agricultural Technology: Direct and Indirect Effects // Journal Of Development Studies. – 2002. – № 4. – p. 1-26. – doi: 10.1080/0022038041233132240. 15. FAO (2022). State of Food Insecurity in the World. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome, Italy 16. Ferreira APAL, de Oliveira L., Talamini E. Land use returns in organic and conventional farming systems: financial and beyond // Org Agric. – 2022. – № 3. – p. 353-371. 17. Foguesatto C.R., Borges J.A.R., Machado J.A.D. A review and some reflections on farmers’ adoption of sustainable agricultural practices worldwide // Sci Total Environ. – 2020. – p. 138831. 18. Fu X., Gong Y. Indigenous and foreign innovation efforts and drivers of technological upgrading: evidence from China // World Dev. – 2011. – p. 1213-1225. 19. García-Cortijo M.C., Castillo-Valero J.S., Carrasco I. Innovation in rural Spain: What drives innovation in the rural-peripheral areas of southern Europe? // J Rural Stud. – 2019. – p. 114-124. 20. Gatewood E.J., Shaver K.G., Gartner W.B. A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start-up behaviors and success at venture creation // J Bus Ventur. – 1995. – № 5. – p. 371-391. 21. Joachim S. Review of history and recent development of organic farming worldwide // Agric Sci China. – 2006. – № 3. – p. 169-178. 22. MacRae RJ, Hill SB, Mehuys GR, Henning J (1990) Farmscale agronomic and economic conversion from 23. Mishra B., Gyawali B.R., Paudel K.P., Poudyal N.C., Simon M.F., Dasgupta S., Antonious G. Adoption of sustainable agriculture practices among farmers in Kentucky, USA // Environ Manag. – 2018. – № 6. – p. 1060-1072. 24. Ndaba B., Roopnarain A., Haripriya RAMA., Maaza M. Biosynthesized metallic nanoparticles as fertilizers: an emerging precision agriculture strategy // J Integr Agric. – 2022. – № 5. – p. 1225-1242. 25. Ogundari K., Bolarinwa O. Impact of agricultural innovation adoption: a meta-analysis // Australian Journal Of Agricultural And Resource Economics. – 2018. – № 2. – p. 217-236. – doi: 10.1111/1467-8489.12247. 26. Orlov-Nicolaisen S. Barriers to the difusion of ICT: A case study among farmers in Tajikistan // iSCHANNEL. – 2021. – № 1. 27. Ploll U., Arato M., Börner J., Hartmann M. Sustainable innovations: a qualitative study on farmers’ perceptions driving the diffusion of beneficial soil microbes in Germany and the UK // Sustain. – 2022. – № 10. – p. 5749. 28. Rizzo G., Migliore G., Schifani G. Key factors influencing farmers’ adoption of sustainable innovations: a systematic literature review and research agenda // Org. Agr.. – 2024. – p. 57-84. – doi: 10.1007/s13165-023-00440-7. 29. Tadjiev Abdusame, Djanibekov Nodir, Herzfeld Thomas Does zero tillage save or increase production costs? // Evidence from smallholders in Kyrgyzstan, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. – 2023. – № 1. – p. 1-16. – doi: 10.1080/14735903.2023.2270191. 30. Tey Y.S., Brindal M. Factors influencing the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: a review for policy implication // Precis Agric. – 2012. – p. 713-730. 31. Thorsøe M.H., Noe E.B., Lamandé M., Frelih-Larsen A., Kjeldsen C., Zandersen M., Schjønning P. Sustainable soil management-farmers’ perspectives on subsoil compaction and the opportunities and barriers for intervention // Land Use Policy. – 2019. – p. 427-437. 32. Zanello G., Fu X., Mohnen P., Ventresca M. The creation and diffusion of innovation in developing countries: a systematic literature review // J Econ Surv. – 2016. – № 5. – p. 884-912. 33. Zulfiqar F., Thapa G.B. Determinants and intensity of adoption of ‘better cotton’ as an innovative cleaner production alternative // J Clean Prod. – 2018. – p. 3468–3478.